Above, I made a post at 5:54 at 6:06 Ham responded to it, and you can see the words for yourselves. I see no "glitch" I see a liar who then accused me basically of hacking his account and making up posts as him. If anyone has proof I hacked his account, I need to see it. I believe I have better things to do than hack peoples accounts to put fake messages on sports boards, but hey, I want to see Hams accusive evidence he MUST have. I Need a ginormous apology and if ANYONE on here feels I am a low life hacker, please let me know, so I can put you on ignore because I am a better person than that, and after I all I have been through in my life I HATE liars and I deserve better!!!! As far as "the glitch" I have no clue. I am no computer whiz, I don't even know how to tab. Unless of course one can prove I am a hacker. In which case, I would not be wasting my time on sports boards, because there is no money in it 🤔 I will await the proof anyone has. Just a ridiculous and false accusation

@mattwill Eagles 27, Redskins 16 Baun INT

On 12/18/2025 at 7:59 AM, cunninghamtheman said:

I challenge anybody to go back and prove where this was my quote. Just shameless putting words under seemingly my quote. Not quoting me….my name…then a bunch of FL crap.

Here is your problem. Your communication skills. Why not say exactly what was your part of the quote. Then obviously say that the rest must have been the reply? Instead everything needs to be adversarial with you? Why? What was accomplished? You wasted everyone's time. Very simple " I said this part, not this part and here is the time stamp" Then everyone could easily see. Instead " I challenge anyone etc." You have communication issues. You come off pompous, know it all, and like everything is a competition and everyone on here is your enemy. It's a message board for the Eagles. We are all here for the comradery of talking about our team. Why are you here ? You don't seem like you like people or being part of a group?

Saturday (Game Day) Morning Eagles-Commanders Game Score Predictions -- 14 hours until Kickoff

Only 21 predictions have been recorded so far with all 21 for an Eagles win ... with an average predicted score of Eagles 29 and Commanders 15

As we do each week, we are gathering Game Score predictions. As always, please tag your prediction post with @mattwill that way I will be sure to see/record it.  Score predictions can also have an optional "Bonus Pick" tiebreaker prediction.  I will be taking predictions right up until Kickoff. If someone posts a prediction without a tag, please reply to it including the @mattwill tag.

Those 21 predictions are:

19 hours ago, mattwill said:

1 hour ago, capmaster24 said:

2 hours ago, EaglesTD123 said:

Well I can't get rid of all these names,so I am posting this to clear them as there is no way to erase them apparently now

2 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

JOE IS THE GREATEST

JOE IS THE GREATEST

JOE IS THE GREATEST

NOW... DO YOU SEE WHAT HAPPENED???

I replied Joe is the greatest, but it went within your quote, this is what happened on your Tuesday 11:36 post on page 2613 when you went to reply to Hams ( Tuesday 6:06 post on page 2611)

Your link and reply went right into Ham's quote. Just like it looks here like you said Joe is the greatest, but it was my reply, not your quote... it looks like Ham said all that but he didn't.

15 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

CB and O line are career moves,thats why you take them high

I USED TO GET HIGH AT MY GIGS !

OR IS THIS JOE SHOWING ME HOW A REPLY CAN ACCIDENTALLY GO INTO SOMEONE'S QUOTE AND MAKE IT LOOK LIKE THEY SAID IT?

SEE?

15 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

CB and O line are career moves,thats why you take them high

I HEARD JOE WAS A GREAT CB BACK WHEN HE PLAYED INTRAMURALS IN COLLEGE

Thanks for saying that, I was pretty decent, had a pick 6 on our first play sophomore year. The old Hernan Edwards trick, make the guy look open on the out route and then step in the passing lane for an easy one.

😆😆😆😆😆😆

So why did this suddenly crop up when it was never a problem before??? And once you post you can delete the words posted but not the name and so no matter what, that name will appear and remain until you post something. As far as Ham goes the link was a factual link with a correct observation from his 6:06 post. Nothing bad in there if you just let it pass and no I don't go around hacking others. This board is becoming more trouble than it's worth. Sorry I posted FACTS. His post STILL said(at 6:06) McKees stats got padded when Hurts went out. Hurts going out had nothing to do with McKees stats. He could have tossed 3 picks, so I see nothing that would make anyone mad but if that's how we're going to work this board I will not be posting much if I have to tip toe around everyone's tiny weak feelings posting factual links. This needs to be fixed and put back the way it was. What you posted Joe wouldn't have made me go ballistic. I would have posted "I never said that" Then posted what I said(and didn't) then it could be discussed, but to lash out at you for the above post(s) is childish and uncalled for and to make others think it was purposeful(which would require me hacking accounts) is a ridiculous escalation. So I suppose the best thing for me is to put Ham back on ignore until such time he apologizes for childish behavior over a simple mistake which was totally factual and no threat to him whatsoever. If he ever apologizes let me know because as of now Ham will be put on ignore. I do not take slander lightly. He goes on ignore right now. Thanks for the explanation Joe

2 hours ago, joemas6 said:

SEE?

Yes

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

Yes

2 hours ago, joemas6 said:

Thanks for saying that, I was pretty decent, had a pick 6 on our first play sophomore year. The old Hernan Edwards trick, make the guy look open on the out route and then step in the passing lane for an easy one.

😆😆😆😆😆😆

So here I posted "yes" and I could go back and remove/delete that yes, but my name would still remain and there is no way to remove it, so whatever glitch there is, isn't and there is no way to fix it unless one of you comp whizs can figure it out

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

So here I posted "yes" and I could go back and remove/delete that yes, but my name would still remain and there is no way to remove it, so whatever glitch there is, isn't and there is no way to fix it unless one of you comp whizs can figure it out

So here I tried to refresh the post to erase what I posted before and it won't reset the post to "clear" even if I hit refresh at the top of my comp, so this is going to be an issue going forward

The only way to clear it is by posting even if others are on that post. You have to type outside all the boxes at the bottom but they all will still show as they cannot be removed. Mine are very light and difficult to see, but to get a clear board that is the only way.

At any rate, sorry Joe. I should have gone off on you and had a ballistic tantrum like someone cut off my leg and poured sulfur on it while setting my hair on fire. I will try to do better next time 🤣

17 hours ago, capmaster24 said:

Seattle won the toss and chose to kick off!

18 hours ago, capmaster24 said:

Because Seattle went 2nd they had the opportunity to make a choice. That's the advantage going 2nd. Andy Reid and the Chiefs made the big thing about it when they won the first playoff game that had this scenario. Isn't he supposed to be your hero?

You see it as an advantage they had the pressure of gotta score a TD plus two point conversion? That seems like most difficult path to achieve.

18 hours ago, capmaster24 said:

The point is going 2nd you know everything. you go first you don't. The Rams didn't go for 2 because they didn't have that opportunity.

"Know everything” could also be having the pressure on you

17 hours ago, capmaster24 said:

Would the scheme we have now be around forever? What specifically when looking at OL or CB are you thinking scheme wise at the moment that would change the pick?

Seems like that answer would tie into Fangio digging in here until retiring. On O I’d see it as is Siri answering enough at this point to get the guy on O? Best scenario would be Siri just rocks it this postseason and we do have everything locked in longer term.

How much is Siri holding back on his cards? Hadn’t been anything to play for. Would be great if they’ve been installing plenty in practice for later here. Bust it out in the win or go home time.

Little bit of discussion about Saquan maybe needing to adapt a bit like Sanders really needed to in this O. Just talking about not taking the negative runs…especially on first down. Some seem to think he maybe is looking to home run hit too much. I’m just seeing him need a bit better vision and timing hitting the holes better. He’s always been a high volume rusher. That hasn’t been going on this season really. Which can be positive towards his fresher legs. A legit reason/excuse for his lesser production.

54 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

"Know everything” could also be having the pressure on you

They changed the OT rules to tighten up the numbers and make things more even regardless of coin outcome. Was glaring…take ball. Now it’s much closer and clearly debatable. I don’t even believe we can just negate which team is chosing with what personnel….add in who’s their opponent?

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

They changed the OT rules to tighten up the numbers and make things more even regardless of coin outcome. Was glaring…take ball. Now it’s much closer and clearly debatable. I don’t even believe we can just negate which team is chosing with what personnel….add in who’s their opponent?

Scoring first and applying that pressure on our opponent considering the quality of our D in this advantageous situation I’m especially feeling trust in. Each kicks a field goal then going first advantage of first team to get that second OT drive. 10 minute shortened OT period really has been showing up as only three minutes(ish) left in OT after both initial drives.

K has to be a factor. Dicker level K has massive range. But a much weaker opponent K maybe you try for the D stop first taking much burden off the O. Shutting any score. I’d chose to defer against weak K and less than stellar O opponent.

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

K has to be a factor. Dicker level K has massive range. But a much weaker opponent K maybe you try for the D stop first taking much burden off the O. Shutting any score. I’d chose to defer against weak K and less than stellar O opponent.

You got me to consider and adjust on this I’ll grant you Capmaster.

I don’t like opponent scoring first applying max pressure on us to score a TD…maybe two point also. It was Hurts fault on that interception being forced. But no way he was contemplating a field goal after they only kicked a field goal. Team going first kicks a field goal all needed for the second team pressured to TD or bust.

Other very potential scenario: get it first and no score. Actually has the second team to get on O in a tough situation over fourth down risk. Go for it on fourth or not? Opponent in a less aggressive mentality. Plus gives our D a fourth down stop opportunity to set us up for a Field goal.