3 minutes ago, Original Sin said:

 

Is that SF/DET spread correct?

1 minute ago, Connecticut Eagle said:

Is that SF/DET spread correct?

Seems wrong to me , below is more accurate 

 

 

4 minutes ago, Original Sin said:

Lions biggest favorites of the weekend over the 9ers?  No way they cover, I'd take that any day.

Well we will get to see Kyle Pitts up close in week 1 for all the people that wanted him.

I was wrong predicting week 1 vs WFT. 

Still think, though, we'll see Biden at an Eagles game at some point.

2 minutes ago, EricAllenPick6 said:

I don't think this affects the re-build.  We did not stock up a LB, there is no real youth movement there.  He would be a stop-gap starter & he's only under contract for 2 more years. 

You are using assets and money on a guy you don’t need and won’t be around when your competitive. They should be focused on long term. If he was a free agent it would make more sense, but not to trade for him.

Just now, 315Eagles said:

Well we will get to see Kyle Pitts up close in week 1 for all the people that wanted him.

Unfortunately, our LBs will not be as up close as they should.

2 minutes ago, Connecticut Eagle said:

Is that SF/DET spread correct?

No. SF is -7

 

1 minute ago, EricAllenPick6 said:

Lions biggest favorites of the weekend over the 9ers?  No way they cover, I'd take that any day.

Maybe they know something we dont.

49ers might be the most overrated team.  Everyone loves them and thinks they're great but they've had 1 great year since Shanahan has been there.

Yeah PFF corrected it in their next tweet. 

Week 1 is usually such a crapshoot....but I actually think the Giants are a really good play, I don't think Denver should be favoured on the road at all. 

2 minutes ago, Connecticut Eagle said:

Unfortunately, our LBs will not be as up close as they should.

I'd agree if Schwartz was still DC.

AZ and GB would be my two picks , take the points and the win

1 minute ago, LeanMeanGM said:

No. SF is -7

Well that's disappointing.  I thought they were giving away free $$ on opening day.

3 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

You are using assets and money on a guy you don’t need and won’t be around when your competitive. They should be focused on long term. If he was a free agent it would make more sense, but not to trade for him.

Yeah, I get that perspective.  I fear the defense will be pretty bad this year, and we could use him just to hold down a LB spot until we get some youth there.

Wouldn't shock me if Dallas beats TB week 1.  

Get ready for the hype train afterwards 😄

are we doing leaks here?

1 minute ago, 315Eagles said:

Wouldn't shock me if Dallas beats TB week 1.  

Get ready for the hype train afterwards 😄

Nothing would shock me in the NFL , question is will they or won’t they beat them ?

im not sure Dallas has the D to slow the Bucs down , but the Bucs have the D to slow any team down . 

2 hours ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

Man, you sure get defensive of all players not named Carson Wentz.  They don't know you care as much as you do.  It's a shame.  It would make a big difference in their lives.  

Nah.  This has more to do with the majority of die-hard Wentz fans hating Hurts because he took Wentz’ job. 

18 hours ago, Connecticut Eagle said:

Any interest in bringing them back?

 

 

Henderson, Nevada has been in talks for years with them.

 

20 minutes ago, pgcd3 said:

are we doing leaks here?

I’m leaking 

 

49ers week 2

@ Giants week 12

Just now, LeanMeanGM said:

49ers week 2

@ Giants week 12

I'm not sure whether it's good/bad avoiding Lance (likely) in week 2.

 

2 minutes ago, RLC said:

I'm not sure whether it's good/bad avoiding Lance (likely) in week 2.

Probably better to get them later on when George Brittle goes down 

Didn’t realize how much we get screwed over by the schedule.