3 minutes ago, greend said:

I personally felt that we were beating the Patriots for the Super Bowl. In this one I have my doubts

Going into that game I was cautiously confident.

Once Foles caught the TD, I had no doubt, even when the Pats took a 33-32 lead.

17 minutes ago, Sack that QB said:

Deebo said they were going to expose our DBs.

Who else is sick of niners yapping their traps.

I want the eagles to win to shut the niners up more than I want them to beat KC.

I'm sure when that happens niners will still be flapping their gums saying we would of beat them by 40 blocking Chris Jones with our backup TE...😒

7 minutes ago, downundermike said:

He is not going to do that, he will sign at a minimum a new 2 year deal with some type of signing bonus.

 

Okay, but how does that add additional void money beyond 2023?  Isn’t the void money separate and distinct from any money that comes with a new contract?

12 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Why does it say staple?

It looks like it says stable…

like it’s reassuring you he’s not one of those eagles fans you see on tv

3 minutes ago, Sack that QB said:

Deebo said they were going to expose our DBs.

Well, the Eagles DL exposed their OL.

4 minutes ago, greend said:

I personally felt that we were beating the Patriots for the Super Bowl. In this one I have my doubts

You were more optimistic than I was.  I had no such optimism … no pessimism either, just uncertainty.

Good to see you my friend!

 

15 minutes ago, NCiggles said:

I thought it said stable. 

It's starle in block letters 

1 minute ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

 

I hope they studied their scripts. 

Jake the Snake looking like Johnny Depp at the end of Blow. 

 

 

7 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

 

That's funny cause I saw a bunch of Chiefs fans whining about him being the ref before they even beat Cinci

7 minutes ago, mattwill said:

Okay, but how does that add additional void money beyond 2023?  Isn’t the void money separate and distinct from any money that comes with a new contract?

Because, as Howie Roseman does, they would spread out any signing bonus to lower this years cap hit.

So using @Aerolithe_Lion contract suggestion, here is the existing deal, the new deal, and the impact total.

So here are the options.

Graham currently has a 9.6 million cap hit for 2023.  This contract can not stay in place, as there is large guarantees that kick in the second day of the 2023 league year for 2024 and 2025.

Option 1 - release Graham before the second day of the league year - cap hit goes from 9.663 million to 19.811 million

Option 2 - release Graham with a post June 1 designation, cap hit goes from 9.663 million to 9.905 million in 2023 and 2024

Option 3 - sign Graham to the new deal @Aerolithe_Lion suggested, cap hit goes from 9.663 million to 13.413 million, and then you can post June 1 release him in 2024, leaving cap hits of 5.449 million in 2024 and 2025.

 

Love BG but time to move on and take the cap hit. Fitting his last game for us is another SB

The fix is in. 

 

 

14 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

 

Yeah, I heard someone talking about how he favors the Chiefs and will be calling everything on the defense against PM.

1 hour ago, LeanMeanGM said:

My file crashed but I'm pretty good at saving it. I went back the past day and didn't see any missing but if I am, let me know

PHI - 27

KC - 23

Bonus: Epps INT 

3 minutes ago, RememberTheKoy said:

The fix is in. 

Rent is due everyday  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  The fix is in

Lol

 

46 minutes ago, Parrot Head said:

Did the status ever change from "Processing” to "Shipped”?

Mine is supposed to ship today for overnight delivery tomorrow, but status still showing "Processing”

I don't know, but I got an e-mail that said it was out for delivery today.  It was showing as 'Processing' as late as this last weekend, though.

Brian Dawkins - Eagles 35 Chiefs 30

6 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

Lol

 

Weekend at Bernies reboot starring Jerry Jones.

22 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

It's starle in block letters 

Is that some tik tok code for drugs or trans or trans drugs that change up your pronouns? 

 

1 minute ago, LeanMeanGM said:

 

I like the three way part with two chicks. So this is a let down 

28 minutes ago, downundermike said:

Because, as Howie Roseman does, they would spread out any signing bonus to lower this years cap hit.

So using @Aerolithe_Lion contract suggestion, here is the existing deal, the new deal, and the impact total.

So here are the options.

Graham currently has a 9.6 million cap hit for 2023.  This contract can not stay in place, as there is large guarantees that kick in the second day of the 2023 league year for 2024 and 2025.

Option 1 - release Graham before the second day of the league year - cap hit goes from 9.663 million to 19.811 million

Option 2 - release Graham with a post June 1 designation, cap hit goes from 9.663 million to 9.905 million in 2023 and 2024

Option 3 - sign Graham to the new deal @Aerolithe_Lion suggested, cap hit goes from 9.663 million to 13.413 million, and then you can post June 1 release him in 2024, leaving cap hits of 5.449 million in 2024 and 2025.

 

For a full voided deal and release of BG, You’re adding his base salary in 2023 to the voided number which he wouldn’t receive to get to that 19.8. Add up the individual prorations left and it’s around 18.1. The 9.6 number in 2023 is including that 1.5m salary which he wouldn’t get.

In option 2, how would it be possible to post him as a June 1st cut? There is an NFL allowance where some players can sign immediately in FA when a team designates them as a June 1st cut, but for the team cutting them, they remain on the books until then. In this scenario, how can he be June 1st cut if his contract is set to automatically void if not reworked?

Option 3 is not him going from 9 to 13, because 9 was never a possible outcome of his 2023 cap number. It is a fake number due to the voids, he is either an 18m cap casualty or something lower on a reworked deal.