22 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Or... just listen to what Spags said?

Is it possible both can be true? That Spags focused and shut down Saquan….then we passed to convert the resulting clear passing situations?

4 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Totally understand you are one step at a time thinking. You go with things until you get beat and figured out. I’m more proactive. I’m looking to be a step ahead. I want to keep developing and adding already understanding what’s obviously inevitable.

Did Ali change things after he won his first title bout? No he made others beat him and that took a LONG time didn't it?

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

UH when the 2's and 3's played the offense functioned just as well. Hurts isn't the cog that makes the O line function, please. But we know the agenda by now that the team collapses without your god(which is false)

They lit up the scoreboard once they got going....even without Hurts. Smith catches that easy pass and even more points and no loss to Washington.

2 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

How about what Spags says instead of what you say?

Find me where he stated he called stacking the box against Saquan on the clear passing down and distances?

3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I’m saying myself Spags focused on Saquan. You are being way too simple. That actually completely worked though. So after focusing and shutting down Saquan over and over again….what happened the other downs? Saquan ran for 2 yards a carry. We both agree we still stuck with him.

There is no other situation that could result but having obvious tough passing downs.

2 yards x2 =4 yards, then you make a 7 yard pass. And you move the chains and BURN THE CLOCK. Or if your pass is 5 yards,you run the tush push on 4th an 1. What is difficult to understand doing this when you have a nice lead in the SB??? Does Barkley REALLY need to light it up at that point? Good ,play that run, and we will beat you with this formula

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Is it possible both can be true? That Spags focused and shut down Saquan….then we passed to convert the resulting clear passing situations?

I prefer to listen to Spags and all the other experts than you...no offense.

You are a proud person that marches to your own beat....which is great for you. But it doesn't mean that I think you know more than coaches, GMs, salary cap sites etc.

You have your obvious biases...that are your spin which again... it works for you and I'm happy for you. But that's all it is, your spin.

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Find me where he stated he called stacking the box against Saquan on the clear passing down and distances?

Lol... keep spinning my man..be true to yourself!

7 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

The plan was beautiful with keeping the run in play.

It's beyond logic in Hamityville. it's TOO SIMPLE to grasp this concept. I was very proud of Siri, who grew all year long and OUTCOACHED AR

4 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

2 yards x2 =4 yards, then you make a 7 yard pass. And you move the chains and BURN THE CLOCK. Or if your pass is 5 yards,you run the tush push on 4th an 1. What is difficult to understand doing this when you have a nice lead in the SB???

The Eagles are tough to beat when the offense plays ahead of the chains.

7 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

They lit up the scoreboard once they got going....even without Hurts. Smith catches that easy pass and even more points and no loss to Washington.

Hurts must have been in their headsets making those calls,it's the only explanation 🤣

8 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Did Ali change things after he won his first title bout? No he made others beat him and that took a LONG time didn't it?

Did we have to change to win the SB just like I was telling you would he needed all along to accomplish that?

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

It's beyond logic in Hamityville. it's TOO SIMPLE to grasp this concept. I was very proud of Siri, who grew all year long and OUTCOACHED AR

Wasn't even close. Really you could easily argue if the field wasn't slippery in the previous Superbowl...that's 3 times in a row Siri outcoached Reid....with 3 different sets of coordinators.

16 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Having a nice lead meant Barkley didn't need to run amok, the plan after DeJeans pick 6 was just to keep the ball in bounds and make them beat us. Of course we kept scoring anyway because their D was weak. KC got to the SB on refs calls,they weren't that talented

Their D was far from weak. Another #HurtsHater attempt to take away from our leader.

1 minute ago, joemas6 said:

The Eagles are tough to beat when the offense plays ahead of the chains.

IDK that I remember Barkley smiling in NY. besides the fact he had an O line for once in his career, he was actually enjoying himself. Once Barkley starts enjoying himself he will destroy your very existence LOL. When he had the chance to break the record, he declined. Everyone on planet earth knows he could have had it if he wanted. he wants others to eat and win and smile and enjoy the game

15 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Just the best of all time

Wouldn’t say that at all. But clearly redefining what it takes to win. Everything you thought you knew of why Hurts couldn’t do it…he still did it. At some point you just going to have to quit denying what you’ve been seeing this entire time from him.

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Their D was far from weak. Another #HurtsHater attempt to take away from our leader.

WEAK, not quite as weak as this argument, but close. They got to the SB based on paying off refs unless you were blind all post season

3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Did we have to change to win the SB just like I was telling you would he needed all along to accomplish that?

Yeah... big change running Barkley more than Hurts throwing??

14 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

The plan was beautiful with keeping the run in play.

After Siri got out of the way to begin his career here….at what point have we not been physically dominating using our very deliberately designed massive run blocking Oline and skilled RB?

20 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Having a nice lead meant Barkley didn't need to run amok, the plan after DeJeans pick 6 was just to keep the ball in bounds and make them beat us. Of course we kept scoring anyway because their D was weak. KC got to the SB on refs calls,they weren't that talented

This post is complete horse poo. I won’t stand for you trying to cheapen our SB season. We earned it all the way. Chiefs been contending for several straight years. They were looking to three-peat and we stopped them.

5 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Their D was far from weak. Another #HurtsHater attempt to take away from our leader.

Then how did we keep scoring if their D was so tough? I mean why didn't they shut us down? How many points did we put up again?

22 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Having a nice lead meant Barkley didn't need to run amok, the plan after DeJeans pick 6 was just to keep the ball in bounds and make them beat us. Of course we kept scoring anyway because their D was weak. KC got to the SB on refs calls,they weren't that talented

How many team beat the Chiefs last season? What was their D ranked? Absolutely everything proves clearly the opposite of your unfounded opinion. Why would you even say anything like this statement? I mean a Giants fan I could see just making up crap hating. But why would you ever think or say this? We earned it! We beat the best! Nothing handed to us.

20 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

UH when the 2's and 3's played the offense functioned just as well. Hurts isn't the cog that makes the O line function, please. But we know the agenda by now that the team collapses without your god(which is false)

Hurts doesn’t make the Oline function. But last season he finally took over calling the blocking assignments and audibling control. Huge!

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

This post is complete horse poo. I won’t stand for you trying to cheapen our SB season. We earned it all the way. Chiefs been contending for several straight years. They were looking to three-peat and we stopped them.

LMAO who is cheapening anything? it's because I am right and you can't admit it,but we know by now. The truth doesn't cheapen anything at all, It was a great coaching job/strategy and play calling and we won

5 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Yeah... big change running Barkley more than Hurts throwing??

Yeah…what were the results of each? Saquan didn’t lack carries. Our plays were made by Hurts…not Saquan.

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

How many team beat the Chiefs last season? What was their D ranked? Absolutely everything proves clearly the opposite of your unfounded opinion. Why would you even say anything like this statement? I mean a Giants fan I could see just making up crap hating. But why would you ever think or say this? We earned it! We beat the best! Nothing handed to us.

https://www.footballdb.com/statistics/nfl/team-stats/defense-totals/2024 Sorry to bust your bubble LOL