4 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

On and on page after page

And he didn’t even understand that Evans was saying that Hurts’ performance was far superior to Burrow’s. Reading is fundamental.

11 hours ago, Iggles_Phan said:

I didn't cherry pick anything. If you want to call Chase the best WR ever, I really have to question your longevity as a fan. That's fine though. Personally, I don't see Chase as head and shoulders above Jefferson or even AJ Brown. Different styles certainly, but Chase isn't that far ahead of Brown. And then when you consider #2 WRs, you have to consider Smith vs. Higgins. For my money, Smith is better than Higgins. Just my opinion. BUT... what Chase and Jefferson did with Burrow in college is completely irrelevant to this discussion.

Burrow in the NFL has been better than Hurts in the NFL... The weapons around them have been pretty similar in terms of skill positions. I'd put Brown, Smith and Goedert against Chase, Higgins and Hayden Hurst. I'd also put Sanders and Swift up against Mixon, with a slight nod to Mixon. Obviously, the '24 version of the Eagles offense with Barkley (which is what that comparison was about... '21 Burrow and '24 Hurts) is a major swing in favor of the Eagles. The EAGLES offense last year was a 'dream team' or 'super team' build... Literally all 11 (10 if you want to knock them for the pass protection foibles of Becton, but his running blocking, IMO more than made up for that), not just 5 or 6 like the Bengals with Burrow. But the OL disparity cannot be minimized. Burrow gets hit the most of any QB in the league faster than any other QB, and facing the least amount of blitzes, because their starting OL can't reliably block 4, so teams don't have to bring more than 4 to get fast pressure on Burrow.

Read about it here: https://www.si.com/nfl/bengals/contextualizing-bengals-qb-joe-burrow-s-brutal-blitz-numbers-with-stats-videos-01jz5x052c7v

Yep knew this was coming like I said…you are that guy. The comparison was SB…and playoffs only. You missed that whole specific part of the discussion.

11 hours ago, mattwill said:

Ham, what point are you trying to make with this video? It seems rather pointless.

In addition, you appear to have completely missed the point of the Evans tweet. What do you think the point of that tweet was?

It said comparing SBs performances against each other…added in the playoff run up to it.

11 hours ago, mattwill said:

Ham, what point are you trying to make with this video? It seems rather pointless.

In addition, you appear to have completely missed the point of the Evans tweet. What do you think the point of that tweet was?

It said Burrow "carried 52 men”…while Hurts "was carried” ….after listing off playoff and SB run stats.

49 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Yep knew this was coming like I said…you are that guy. The comparison was SB…and playoffs only. You missed that whole specific part of the discussion.

You seem to enjoy discussing things with yourself and quoting yourself liberally based on the last 2 pages. Have at it.

I'm sorry to have interrupted you.

Burrow pretty much choked away that SB

10 hours ago, mattwill said:

And he didn’t even understand that Evans was saying that Hurts’ performance was far superior to Burrow’s. Reading is fundamental.

So what were the quotes at the end of Burrow "carried 52 other men”…Hurts” was carried”? How were you taking those quotes as him thinking Hurts was so far superior?

9 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

It said comparing SBs performances against each other…added in the playoff run up to it.

But you made no such comparison. Further, why was any such comparison necessary given the bottom line of Evans’ tweet?

9 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

It said Burrow "carried 52 men”…while Hurts "was carried” ….after listing off playoff and SB run stats.

No it did not say that. Did you miss the quotation marks? Evans was mocking (making fun of) all the people who have been saying "got carried.” Did that mockery fly over your head?

5 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

So what were the quotes at the end of Burrow "carried 52 other men”…Hurts” was carried”? How were you taking those quotes as him thinking Hurts was so far superior?

They were not his words or thoughts. He structured the graphic of the tweet to have the statistical facts make a mockery of the quotes.

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

Look up the word "sarcasm"

Or "scorn.”

5 hours ago, mattwill said:

No it did not say that. Did you miss the quotation marks? Evans was mocking (making fun of) all the people who have been saying "got carried.” Did that mockery fly over your head?

You’re implying he meant it sarcastically?

5 hours ago, mattwill said:

They were not his words or thoughts. He structured the graphic of the tweet to have the statistical facts make a mockery of the quotes.

Seems to have been derived from what are actually somes thoughts.

38 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

You’re implying he meant it sarcastically?

Nothing about what I said was "implying” any more than his post was implying. Both he and I were wholly and completely explicit.

39 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Seems to have been derived from what are actually somes thoughts.

Not "derived” … directly quoted.

You don’t seem to recognize mockery when you see it. He thinks those "somes” are idiots.

On 7/2/2025 at 4:54 PM, cunninghamtheman said:

Maybe you could work on improving your own resume to fall back on a bit.

Don't care about a resume... you don't seem to get that part ... that nobody cares about our own resumes... that's a you thing!

On 7/2/2025 at 5:40 PM, cunninghamtheman said:

How many more seasons you expecting Lane to play? 1? Possibly 2?

Minimum 2, he has been consistent in saying that

On 7/3/2025 at 9:02 PM, cunninghamtheman said:

Sad that you can only think of premature ejaculating from your experiences. For me it’s more relatable to foreplay. To each their own.

Crickets!!!!

1 hour ago, mattwill said:

Not "derived” … directly quoted.

You don’t seem to recognize mockery when you see it. He thinks those "somes” are idiots.

When it comes to Hurts.... just complete blindness.... any other player completely different.... but this guy, everything goes out the window... any rational thought. You see how triggered he was.... post after post. LOL

9 hours ago, mattwill said:

Not "derived” … directly quoted.

You don’t seem to recognize mockery when you see it. He thinks those "somes” are idiots.

It could be taken either way….sarcasm is difficult to get across in this format.

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

It could be taken either way….sarcasm is difficult to get across in this format.

Not in the visual format of the tweet. In the EMB, I agree sarcasm is challenging to convey, but you simply let your biases cause you to misunderstand the clear message of the tweet. You imagine "haters” where they don’t exist. Your motto is "They’re everywhere! They’re everywhere!”

2 hours ago, mattwill said:

Not in the visual format of the tweet. In the EMB, I agree sarcasm is challenging to convey, but you simply let your biases cause you to misunderstand the clear message of the tweet. You imagine "haters” where they don’t exist. Your motto is "They’re everywhere! They’re everywhere!”

Hurts is perfect

Howie is just OK

Sirianni isn't a good coach.

The agenda never changes.... mention anything regarding the first and you will trigger a couple of pages of a monologue.

Interesting #s

"It'll be a great challenge for us to see where we're at... We'll get to go out there and play against the best of the best," Patrick Mahomes when asked about Eagles rematch so soon week two

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

"It'll be a great challenge for us to see where we're at... We'll get to go out there and play against the best of the best," Patrick Mahomes when asked about Eagles rematch so soon week two

A few different people trying to make more of this story. Really thought he put highest respect on our franchise.