July 14, 20251 yr 9 hours ago, joemas6 said:What does this mean? the 2027 2nd is worth a 2027 1st?If you are trying to say a 2026 2nd is worth a 2027 1st, ... no shot IMO... I agree the drop in round for the next year, just don't agree it's 100% accurate or true when it comes to the 1st round.I mean you are about to enter day 2 of the draft, do you really think you would get next year's first round pick for one of your round 2 picks during the day on Friday leading up to round 2? I don't. Could it happen? Absolutely, very very improbable... so to me a 2nd round pick is no where near worth a 1st round pick, even with the year wait.I'd trade my 2nd round pick each year for a 1st the following year... each year I would have two 1st round picks instead of one in each of the first two rounds... no brainer.This drop in round works later in the draft and follows suit usually when looking at 3rd round this year to 2nd round the next. But if you think McKee is worth a 2026 3rd round... I don't think that means necessarily progressing to 2027 2nd and then to 2028 1st.So if the realistic question is ... would you trade McKee for a 2026 3rd or 2027 2nd... I'll take the 2027 2nd... but I wouldn't look to trade until after this season. It's not significant enough for me to sacrifice having him as the #2 QB. For me would have to be a 2026 1st round pick to even consider, and I agree, he isn't close to being worth that. Not right now, would need some injuries or something to happen to change that.Right now we have a nice cheap #2 QB... don't think anything is being thought to change that. IMO I would think Howie might look to possibly get a late round pick or player swap for the kid from Cleveland before cutting him and then putting him on the PS. That's probably the only move at QB he is looking atYou and I will have to agree to disagree. Here are 10 historical trades that have netted a next year's 1st. The first three are using late 1st Round picks and the remaining seven are with 2nd Round picks
July 14, 20251 yr 1 hour ago, mattwill said:You and I will have to agree to disagree. Here are 10 historical trades that have netted a next year's 1st. The first three are using late 1st Round picks and the remaining seven are with 2nd Round picksAgain...I think you fail to read my posts. " Could it happen? Absolutely," That means it could happen... its nice to see 30 years where 10 trades.... and the first 3 involve swapping this year's #1 for next years (not a 2nd round pick) with the last 2 of the trades actually taking TWO years to get the return ... so you showed 5 trades in the middle there .... 30 years .... out of those 5, two of those trades also involved another pick. So, you are the research man ... if you take the 3 occurrences above.... 2009 swapping pick 371996 swapping pick 411995 swapping pick 51It would be curious to see the teams involved at the time and the rosters / picks that each team had. Or if there were any players involved in addition to those picks.But good quality research showing 3 occasions where this happened in the last 30 years, absolutely verifies my " Could it happen, absolutely" comment. Nice to see when other posters are able to find proof to back up my points.
July 14, 20251 yr Simple view will help here...Do we think a team would offer a 2026 3rd round pick for McKee? What is the possibility? Do we think it's the same probability a team would offer a 2027 2nd round pick? From there what do we think the odds are of getting an offer of a 2028 1st round pick?For me... I think the odds go way down in getting the 2028 1st round pick offer. So again my point, I don't think it's an automatic formula of the one round drop in value per year .... not in every occasion and certainly less when a 1st round pick is involved.
July 14, 20251 yr Also, do I think EVERY teams tries to unload their probable cuts for draft picks each year as the cut down day approaches.... Absolutely. Do I see it as a possibility that Howie can make one of those type of trades, sure. Do I think he gets 3 late round picks that easy for players that the league knows are about to be cut.... most likely not. I believe we will see some player swaps involved and pick swaps. I don't think we see a return of 3 extra picks for 3 guys that would have been cut. Maybe Keegan or Kinnard type of player ... along with a 7th round pick, and get a 6th round pick in return? Something like that.
July 14, 20251 yr So I took a quick glance at those 3 trades.... the 1995 and 1996 trades were both made by the Chargers. A little desperation there.The 2009 trade between Denver and Seattle ended up giving Seattle Earl Thomas in 2010.
July 14, 20251 yr 14 hours ago, Crazy Legs said:It's really conjecture on our parts as to what really goes through the minds of the various GMs as trades/picks emerge.Of course, we can usually foresee what areas need to be addressed, but how to do so is a bit of an art.Howie might be shrewd, but he is not a crook. I believe he pursues his craft with the philoosophy of win/win for both sides. Thus, his success and his recogntion thereof.Fortunately, he has an owner that entrusts him with doing what is best for the Eagles and their tremendous fanbase. That is also part of his "blessing".Apparently he realizes that he has pushed the salary cap "shuffle" about as far as he can and must reign in his void year/dead money shenanigans going forward in order to maintain progress.spotrac.comCam Jurgens | NFL Contracts & Salaries | Spotrac.comCam Jurgens signed a 4 year, $68,000,000 contract with the Philadelphia Eagles with an average annual salary of $17,000,000.Nope..definitely still doing that
July 14, 20251 yr 37 minutes ago, joemas6 said:Again...I think you fail to read my posts. " Could it happen? Absolutely," That means it could happen... its nice to see 30 years where 10 trades.... and the first 3 involve swapping this year's #1 for next years (not a 2nd round pick) with the last 2 of the trades actually taking TWO years to get the return ... so you showed 5 trades in the middle there .... 30 years .... out of those 5, two of those trades also involved another pick.So, you are the research man ... if you take the 3 occurrences above....2009 swapping pick 371996 swapping pick 411995 swapping pick 51It would be curious to see the teams involved at the time and the rosters / picks that each team had. Or if there were any players involved in addition to those picks.But good quality research showing 3 occasions where this happened in the last 30 years, absolutely verifies my " Could it happen, absolutely" comment. Nice to see when other posters are able to find proof to back up my points.That is all I’ve been saying all along it could happen. Nothing more nothing less. You interjected 100% and now you appear to be backing off from that so bottom line we’re in agreement it could happen. The second could be worth a first.
July 14, 20251 yr 3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:spotrac.comCam Jurgens | NFL Contracts & Salaries | Spotrac.comCam Jurgens signed a 4 year, $68,000,000 contract with the Philadelphia Eagles with an average annual salary of $17,000,000.Nope..definitely still doing thatGreat contract!
July 14, 20251 yr 1 minute ago, mattwill said:That is all I’ve been saying all along it could happen. Nothing more nothing less. You interjected 100% and now you appear to be backing off from that so bottom line we’re in agreement it could happen. The second could be worth a first.Probably reading first would help.
July 14, 20251 yr Just now, joemas6 said:Probably reading first would help.My position was explained from the beginning and hasn't changed.
July 14, 20251 yr I understand. My position was equally clear. It would have been simpler if we just accepted each others differing opinions and moved on. It felt like you were rejecting my opinion, as well as covering two different concepts simultaneously.We also get crosswise cause you tend to think monogamously and I tend to think polygamously
July 15, 20251 yr 6 hours ago, mattwill said:I understand. My position was equally clear. It would have been simpler if we just accepted each others differing opinions and moved on. It felt like you were rejecting my opinion, as well as covering two different concepts simultaneously.We also get crosswise cause you tend to think monogamously and I tend to think polygamouslyProbably because you take offense when I said I didn't think something would happen... you skipped the part where it said it's possible. I was never cross at allYou asked my opinion... it would take a 2026 first round pick to consider trading away McKee... and yes I think that is way too high of value for him ... NOW on July 14, 2025.
July 15, 20251 yr How can I put it simple.... I'm not F@@#ing up the team chemistry or the salary cap ... for 1 2nd round pick.... certainly not anything in 2027 or 2028We don't need to change anything, this is the first legit attempt to repeat as a champion.... since 1949... 2027 and 28 drafts can wait
July 15, 20251 yr 1 hour ago, joemas6 said:How can I put it simple.... I'm not F@@#ing up the team chemistry or the salary cap ... for 1 2nd round pick.... certainly not anything in 2027 or 2028We don't need to change anything, this is the first legit attempt to repeat as a champion.... since 1949... 2027 and 28 drafts can waitIn your observation about the Blog posters’ perspectives, they (and I) consistently think like GMs … with a goal of sustained high performance. You and GB and Ham all think like fans with short term accomplishment maximization prized much more than sustained high performance. Part of that difference is that a lot of the Blog posters are older than I believe you and Gb and Ham are. I’m one of three in the Blog born in 1947 and the three of us are younger than several other Bloggers. That means we have lived through only one winning season out of 16 years. And to paraphrase AI, "Playoffs? We talkin’ ‘bout Playoffs?”So, this team is playing with house money. For me, a back-to-back SB win would be outstanding, but if it comes at the price of another 4-11-1 crash like the Eagles’ 2020 season … or a 5-12 like the Rams’ 2022, I’m not a buyer.Philadelphia Eagles5904th of 522020713VermeilBergeyJaworskiHoganCarmichael1923710151219280.9-1.5-0.6-2.51.91976NFLPhiladelphia Eagles41004th of 5165286-121VermeilBergeyBorylaHoganCarmichael2723192122242428-8.60.0-8.7-7.3-1.41975NFLPhiladelphia Eagles41005th of 5225302-77McCormackBergeyGabrielSullivanYoung211716206191726-5.50.9-4.6-4.0-0.61974NFLPhiladelphia Eagles7704th of 524221725McCormackBergeyGabrielSullivanYoung162271871021261.81.12.90.03.01973NFLPhiladelphia Eagles5813rd of 5310393-83McCormackGabrielGabrielSullivanCarmichael82252511201726-5.91.7-4.23.5-7.71972NFLPhiladelphia Eagles21115th of 5145352-207KhayatBradleyReavesJamesJackson2624222422242326-14.80.2-14.6-9.2-5.31971NFLPhiladelphia Eagles6713rd of 5221302-81Khayat,WilliamsBradleyLiskeBullJackson222020265202326-5.81.5-4.3-2.7-1.61970NFLPhiladelphia Eagles31015th of 5241332-91WilliamsSneadSneadPinderJackson1912221223211326-6.52.0-4.5-0.9-3.61969NFLPhiladelphia Eagles4914th of 4279377-98WilliamsJacksonSneadWoodeshickJackson87131412141416-7.0-1.3-8.3-2.4-5.91968NFLPhiladelphia Eagles21204th of 4202351-149KuharichWoodeshickSneadWoodeshickHawkins1515131316141416-10.6-0.1-10.8-6.6-4.21967NFLPhiladelphia Eagles6712nd of 4351409-58KuharichHawkinsSneadWoodeshickHawkins48151410121416-4.1-1.2-5.32.2-7.51966NFLPhiladelphia Eagles9502nd of 8326340-14KuharichBrownSneadBrownRetzlaff51111119101215-1.0-2.0-3.0-0.8-2.21965NFLPhiladelphia Eagles5905th of 73633594KuharichBrownSneadBrownRetzlaff521110873140.3-6.3-6.01.0-7.0PointsTop PlayersOff RankDef RankOverall RankSimple Rating SystemYearLgTmWLTDiv. FinishPlayoffsPFPAPDCoachesAVPasserRusherReceiverPtsYdsPtsYdsT/GPts±Yds±out ofMoVSoSSRSOSRSDSRS1964NFLPhiladelphia Eagles6803rd of 7312313-1KuharichBaughanSneadGrosRetzlaff6489118414-0.1-3.5-3.6-1.5-2.01963NFLPhiladelphia Eagles21027th of 7242381-139SkorichBrownJurgensenBrownRetzlaff1212111013121114-9.91.6-8.4-4.6-3.81962NFLPhiladelphia Eagles31017th of 7
July 15, 20251 yr 9 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:This offends me . It's been a LOOOOOONG road to get here, that is "short term" to you? I didn't become a fan in 2017 like those "fair weather" fans. Now we FINALLY have all the right people in all the right places and we have a shot at repeating and indeed that is SHORT TERM. Why would I NOT be excited for this opportunity? Would you prefer we trash/ tank this season to get better draft picks???? Because it's a longer term outlook? You strike when the iron is hot. NON bloggers are still FANS and I don't appreciate your implication that I am something LESS because I am not a blogger. Very disrespectful of you. Don't tell me about fan sufferings since I lived in the Cleveland zone for a long time and gave up on them(Browns) because they never COULD get their act together. I really DON'T feel like suffering for another 35 years(I don't have the time anyhow) and still supporting this team for whatever amount of time you deem "long term". If you feel we are unworthy of you, maybe you should hang out on the blog site and leave us peons to our page. I'm really not in the mood for being put down, since being a LOSING FAN since 1971(other than 2017 and the losing appearance by McNabb and company). I think I've suffered enough like all the fans have . BLOG all you want, it doesn't make you better than me and I find your post extremely bothersome. I didn't go to Wharton, I can't do spreadsheets, I am no comp whiz but your blood is no greener than mine. Have a nice dayThere was no put down. None overt nor implied. You clearly inferred one where there is/was none. Different strokes for different folks. Some people spend most of their time in "the library” often to their detriment when it comes to experiencing feelings. Other people spend much more time "downstairs” where the feelings are warm and exciting. It takes all kinds to make a village.I try and make it a habit to walk in the shoes of the folks I interact with. Those daily journeys provide and produce plenty of opportunity for observation. I shared my observation with Joe. It had no judgment, just shared observation. I’m sorry that it triggered you. I’ve always lived by the belief that it’s not whether you win or lose, but how you played the game that mattered. My proudest moment as a high school wrestler came in a bout at the New York Athletic Club where I got pinned by my opponent in the Second Period. It was a great triumph to have made it out of the First Period without being flattened. No matter how anyone cut it, it was a loss … a decisive loss. But I knew I had done my very best, and my teammates did too. He was after all an Olympic bronze medalist at the just completed Olympics.Regarding leaving, you’ll just have to put up with me and my eccentricities. I suspect this won’t be the last time I trigger you with my "library” talk.
July 15, 20251 yr 2 hours ago, mattwill said:In your observation about the Blog posters’ perspectives, they (and I) consistently think like GMs … with a goal of sustained high performance. You and GB and Ham all think like fans with short term accomplishment maximization prized much more than sustained high performance. Part of that difference is that a lot of the Blog posters are older than I believe you and Gb and Ham are. I’m one of three in the Blog born in 1947 and the three of us are younger than several other Bloggers. That means we have lived through only one winning season out of 16 years. And to paraphrase AI, "Playoffs? We talkin’ ‘bout Playoffs?”So, this team is playing with house money. For me, a back-to-back SB win would be outstanding, but if it comes at the price of another 4-11-1 crash like the Eagles’ 2020 season … or a 5-12 like the Rams’ 2022, I’m not a buyer.Philadelphia Eagles5904th of 522020713VermeilBergeyJaworskiHoganCarmichael1923710151219280.9-1.5-0.6-2.51.91976NFLPhiladelphia Eagles41004th of 5165286-121VermeilBergeyBorylaHoganCarmichael2723192122242428-8.60.0-8.7-7.3-1.41975NFLPhiladelphia Eagles41005th of 5225302-77McCormackBergeyGabrielSullivanYoung211716206191726-5.50.9-4.6-4.0-0.61974NFLPhiladelphia Eagles7704th of 524221725McCormackBergeyGabrielSullivanYoung162271871021261.81.12.90.03.01973NFLPhiladelphia Eagles5813rd of 5310393-83McCormackGabrielGabrielSullivanCarmichael82252511201726-5.91.7-4.23.5-7.71972NFLPhiladelphia Eagles21115th of 5145352-207KhayatBradleyReavesJamesJackson2624222422242326-14.80.2-14.6-9.2-5.31971NFLPhiladelphia Eagles6713rd of 5221302-81Khayat,WilliamsBradleyLiskeBullJackson222020265202326-5.81.5-4.3-2.7-1.61970NFLPhiladelphia Eagles31015th of 5241332-91WilliamsSneadSneadPinderJackson1912221223211326-6.52.0-4.5-0.9-3.61969NFLPhiladelphia Eagles4914th of 4279377-98WilliamsJacksonSneadWoodeshickJackson87131412141416-7.0-1.3-8.3-2.4-5.91968NFLPhiladelphia Eagles21204th of 4202351-149KuharichWoodeshickSneadWoodeshickHawkins1515131316141416-10.6-0.1-10.8-6.6-4.21967NFLPhiladelphia Eagles6712nd of 4351409-58KuharichHawkinsSneadWoodeshickHawkins48151410121416-4.1-1.2-5.32.2-7.51966NFLPhiladelphia Eagles9502nd of 8326340-14KuharichBrownSneadBrownRetzlaff51111119101215-1.0-2.0-3.0-0.8-2.21965NFLPhiladelphia Eagles5905th of 73633594KuharichBrownSneadBrownRetzlaff521110873140.3-6.3-6.01.0-7.0PointsTop PlayersOff RankDef RankOverall RankSimple Rating SystemYearLgTmWLTDiv. FinishPlayoffsPFPAPDCoachesAVPasserRusherReceiverPtsYdsPtsYdsT/GPts±Yds±out ofMoVSoSSRSOSRSDSRS1964NFLPhiladelphia Eagles6803rd of 7312313-1KuharichBaughanSneadGrosRetzlaff6489118414-0.1-3.5-3.6-1.5-2.01963NFLPhiladelphia Eagles21027th of 7242381-139SkorichBrownJurgensenBrownRetzlaff1212111013121114-9.91.6-8.4-4.6-3.81962NFLPhiladelphia Eagles31017th of 7House money is a loser term. For one with low expectations. The team is set up the best it's ever been since the late 40s...to go on a run. Young team full of winners, yet still plenty of young players that will develop. No where near thinking short term when looking to maximize this situation and keeping the talent level up and deep. That sets a culture that lasts when the second string has to play at a level up and then the 3rd string has to level up. For someone who thinks we have such talent that we can get all these picks for guys that are going to get cut... the contrast in the mentality that we need picks in 2 years after having such a young team now, and all the picks in 2026, makes zero sense. Where are the spots? I'm thinking the focus can be more in developing what's on the roster now, so much potential... then we can have our 2018 and 2022 drafts again... 5 or 6 picks that hit. You can't keep picking 11 draft picks and consistently develop them as that number can't all make the 53. There are stages to the roster building, not all of them involve having 11 picks each season. " The process" isn't always where you think New Orleans is at the moment. And another point that you seem to skip... the talented roster loses players, also gets comp picks. Not necessary to trade away players.
July 15, 20251 yr The 2020 season came due to fluke injuries... and QB in a bad mindset, and plenty of other reasons. Not a young roster that has years to keep winning. This team is built to keep winning... not sure how the " elite thinking bloggers" seem to miss this. Or why they want to give away players. The cap is in good shape... the roster still has young players that will step up. the 2026 draft is 2 seasons worth of picks in one. That's a lot of young players. Young players develop and young players come cheap. That's two long term... not short term positives.An arrogant " I was born in 1947 crap post" trying to spin that we need 11 picks in 2027 and 2028 because of being born in 1947 or what happened in 2020? Or prior to Lurie owning the team... none of that matters or factors into how Hurts, AJ and this young team will perform. For being a long term Eagles fan, you make s dumb statement when looking at 2017 to 2020 and complaining? You went through enough crap. A 4 year period where you win a SB, win a playoff game, win the division to make the playoffs and then have the crap year..... " You wouldn't sacrifice that? " Are you kidding. How arrogant is that thinking 3 out of 4 years in the plays, winning a playoff game in 2 of them and winning one title isn't good in comparison to the crap you witnessed back in your day?Your mindset is all over the place, yet making no sense anywhere here. What is your goal with McKee... you want to trade him or not? I still can't tell.... maybe you need more accounting terms from 1968 to help explain?
July 15, 20251 yr Maybe you prefer to be the Steelers? They keep winning those 9 games.... no playoff win in a decade though... but hey, no 2020... lol
July 15, 20251 yr 6 hours ago, joemas6 said:House money is a loser term. For one with low expectations.It bears repeating "It’s not whether you win or lose, it’s how you played the game.” is the rule I was raised with. Wharton also taught me (and all its students) that a wise company balances two factors if it wants to continue to stay in business and thrive. The first is efficiently and effectively harvesting its mature products and services. The second is tending to the new product development pipeline so that when the sales of mature products and services eventually decline, as they always do, there are new products and services ready to replace those declining sales. Westinghouse and Xerox were textbook examples of companies that focused too much on harvesting and not enough on product development. They were household names that we never see anymore.You choose to harvest more than I do, and I choose to focus more on new product development than you do. It is simply different strokes for different folks. I respect your desire to run with the bulls. I just choose a different approach to maximizing my entertainment.
July 15, 20251 yr 5 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:I apologize. I don't like labels and being put in a box. My mood was awful and I lashed out and I should have not. I was upset over other things and should have stayed off until I cooled downWe are all friends here … family even. I know i have fought with my brothers and sisters many times. That is part of life, and what safer place could there be to blow off steam than here?
July 15, 20251 yr 6 hours ago, joemas6 said:The 2020 season came due to fluke injuries... and QB in a bad mindset, and plenty of other reasons. Not a young roster that has years to keep winning. This team is built to keep winning... not sure how the " elite thinking bloggers" seem to miss this. Or why they want to give away players.The cap is in good shape... the roster still has young players that will step up. the 2026 draft is 2 seasons worth of picks in one. That's a lot of young players. Young players develop and young players come cheap. That's two long term... not short term positives.An arrogant " I was born in 1947 crap post" trying to spin that we need 11 picks in 2027 and 2028 because of being born in 1947 or what happened in 2020? Or prior to Lurie owning the team... none of that matters or factors into how Hurts, AJ and this young team will perform.For being a long term Eagles fan, you make s dumb statement when looking at 2017 to 2020 and complaining? You went through enough crap. A 4 year period where you win a SB, win a playoff game, win the division to make the playoffs and then have the crap year..... " You wouldn't sacrifice that? " Are you kidding. How arrogant is that thinking 3 out of 4 years in the plays, winning a playoff game in 2 of them and winning one title isn't good in comparison to the crap you witnessed back in your day?Your mindset is all over the place, yet making no sense anywhere here. What is your goal with McKee... you want to trade him or not? I still can't tell.... maybe you need more accounting terms from 1968 to help explain?You keep making this about the specifics of the single player McKee. The thinking about Draft resource maximization is a conceptual one, not player specific. The McKee situation is simply a cog in a wheel … a moment in a time thread that stretches both backwards and forwards. It is kind of like life itself. Each of us is just the current incarnation of an energy stream that goes unbroken infinitely into the past and infinitely into the future. Each of us is just the current chapter in a "book” with many chapters stretching in both directions. We never die, but rather our energy stream just moves on to the next chapter unabated. As Einstein said E equals m c squared, and energy is conserved.” For me the Eagles and the Steelers are like that. They provide continual and continuous entertainment. The form of the entertainment varies, but it is always entertaining. As the intro of ABC’s Wide World of Sports said at the beginning of each show "Spanning the globe to bring you the constant variety of sports... the thrill of victory... and the agony of defeat...the human drama of athletic competition... This is "ABC's Wide World of Sports!"”
July 15, 20251 yr If you are a team that feels it needs a starting QB... normally that team would invest it's first round pick to get him.If a team sees McKee as a starter... not just to get him to try out. Then they would invest that same pick. The year won't matter...it's a QB, you either have one or not.If they don't see McKee as the probable solution, then they won't invest a first round pick...in any year.So this silly idea or innuendo of 2026 second Round pick or a 2027 1st ....isn't really realistic.28 minutes ago, mattwill said:You keep making this about the specifics of the single player McKee. The thinking about Draft resource maximization is a conceptual one, not player specific. The McKee situation is simply a cog in a wheel … a moment in a time thread that stretches both backwards and forwards.It is kind of like life itself. Each of us is just the current incarnation of an energy stream that goes unbroken infinitely into the past and infinitely into the future. Each of us is just the current chapter in a "book” with many chapters stretching in both directions. We never die, but rather our energy stream just moves on to the next chapter unabated. As Einstein said E equals m c squared, and energy is conserved.” For me the Eagles and the Steelers are like that. They provide continual and continuous entertainment. The form of the entertainment varies, but it is always entertaining. As the intro of ABC’s Wide World of Sports said at the beginning of each show "Spanning the globe to bring you the constant variety of sports... the thrill of victory... and the agony of defeat...the human drama of athletic competition... This is "ABC's Wide World of Sports!"”What kind of drugs they have out there 🤔
July 15, 20251 yr 1 hour ago, GreenbleedinNC said:https://www.facebook.com/reel/2535945183413258/?s=single_unit&__cft__[0]=AZWzhjRsZs5qhsdZGGqkKoFb61cDuXAt3c-ZgN5SRtLKsf3ObZ6L3cg9_QfUZK8rjxh-lZLwDwgCD_nN85NrbfuOpgGzOrCTjUkvANXlD2jPcXhhUp41nfcD3PyfkolT6QgJEYqa0IIFyULOBJ3v52B_cDqYqfq5SpQmX_B4xNMecIpp3swOq1kG-0cbXnH9I_CgJ0FQR_q3stFFEHSAAblkPnJ4Dx7I0wK-avvTX9LzqA&__tn__=H-R YIKES!!Not retiring any time soon
July 15, 20251 yr 1 hour ago, GreenbleedinNC said:Impressive. I started with 5 pound potato sacks, then went to 10,eventually moving up to 20 pound sacks, then some idiot suggested I put potatoes in them 🤣Coach from the show Cheers... " I was over at the Y doing laps in the pool for an hour" oh yeah, how many did you do coach? " Two. I would have walked them a lot faster if there wasn't water in the pool"
July 15, 20251 yr 1 hour ago, GreenbleedinNC said:https://www.nflmockdraftdatabase.com/big-boards/2026/consensus-big-board-2026 FWIW here is the WAY early composite of '26 draftees. Howie can move pretty much at will with 13 picks to entice teams to move so we can get our targeted players(or more picks). With our "stars" locked on we can bank young guys who can take over when their time is over. Just fabulous planning for the future by this organization. At any rate these are kids to watch during the college games. Any of the top 100 would be worth checking outHow does one come to a "concensus" on who to name the 844th-rated college prospect? Does that mean he still has a chance?
Create an account or sign in to comment