That’s not even bringing up the obvious of how the coaches didn’t have the answers because we all knew what was coming and yet he still was calling those plays. The plays being terrible to counter the D we all knew would be facing.

3 hours ago, EaglesAddict said:

Can totally see this.  In fact, that exact trade is what I predicted in my final mock draft I posted on Tuesday.  But I have them taking Arnold instead of Fuaga.  

I'm not sure how I'd feel if they moved up to 12 and took Fuaga.  He's one of those types that seem to project better at G "but can play tackle in a pinch".  That said, I haven't researched him much.  If they trade up to 12 for him, it better be because he WILL be the future RT.  Trading up to 12 for a lifetime G would be a terrible waste of resources.

Arnold or Mitchell would be a much better use of those resources.  

Why can't he replace Lane....in time and be the RG in the MEANtime? It's like getting 2 players with 1 pick

The playcalling was long developing routes or screen pass. That’s pretty much it.

8 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I scour all kinds of sources for Eagles news. I haven’t come across any of this.

Keep scouring 

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

The playcalling was long developing routes or screen pass. That’s pretty much it.

With zero tweak from the mental midget you say plays QB. 

1 minute ago, joemas6 said:

Keep scouring 

Provide links …just that easy if everybody on the team is complaining about our QB1

Just now, joemas6 said:

Yes...the stud G we have. 

Ok, you phrased the question "would you", as in, present tense, lol.  And no, I would not have traded up for him during the draft that we obtained him.

Just now, joemas6 said:

With zero tweak from the mental midget you say plays QB. 

At that point it isn’t little tweaks…Hurts needed to completely block the doors from coaches and cease control as the OC and HC. Just execute the job of QB on the side.

1 minute ago, EaglesAddict said:

Ok, you phrased the question "would you", as in, present tense, lol.  And no, I would not have traded up for him during the draft that we obtained him.

Hahahaha…I’m good also

4 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

With zero tweak from the mental midget you say plays QB. 

You just so bent on not holding coaching, gameplanning and playcalling accountable. It’s all up to QB1 to automatically constantly just overcome all these every play every game. Gotcha!

But possibly this season we’ll see Hurts just become the HC and OC if things don’t improve from the coaching side of things. Of course then you’ll complain about that. But there was very clear frustration built up over the coaching gameplans and playcalling. That’s why they fired the OC. Didn’t fire the HC however..,so might be the only course of action if Moore can’t deliver something competent.

Who is more likely to be traded during the draft Aiyuck or Higgins?

14 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Keep scouring 

This is what I found:

According to Marcus Hayes of the Philadelphia Inquirer, several offensive players from the Eagles have indicated that the noise levels at their home stadium have been affecting their on-field communication. "Over the past month several Eagles offensive players have hinted that the crowd noise at Lincoln Financial Field has affected the offense's efficiency. Now, they're going public," Hayes reports. The players have struggled with hearing quarterback Jalen Hurts' cadence, catching audibles, and even receiving play calls in the huddle.

This noise issue has led to the Eagles resorting to silent counts in their own stadium, a tactic usually reserved for dealing with hostile away crowds. The issue was notably evident during a drive in a recent game, where the crowd was excessively loud, compelling the team to adapt their communication methods.

Eagles center Jason Kelce, reflecting on the situation, remarked, "It would be nice if you could hear yourself think out there," following the team's overtime victory against theBuffalo Bills. 

Left tackle Jordan Mailata also shared his perspective, stating, "One hundred percent. I would love to hear the cadence. People don't understand the gravity of playing at home. Because we can go on our cadence. Maybe draw them offside."

As the Eagles prepare for their final home game of the season against the Arizona Cardinals, the team is on the brink of clinching an NFC East victory, which would secure at least one more playoff game at home. However, this revelation about the impact of the home crowd noise raises questions about the traditional advantages of playing at home for the Eagles. The team and its fans are now faced with a unique challenge: balancing their enthusiastic support with the practical needs of the players on the field.

Following the loss, JAKIB Sports host Derrick Gunn said he talked to an anonymous Eagles player who called the offense "very predictable."

"Look at our pass routes compared to the Cowboys pass routes," Gunn claimed the player said. "Our pass routes take too long to develop. Dallas gets their **** out real quick."

The one complaint I heard of Hurts was that he was complaining about things even though we were 10-1. That he felt much needed to be fixed even though they were pulling out victories. That Hurts felt like if they didn’t improve these things the team could go on a downward slide. Like some how Hurts realized 10-1 didn’t mean we got an invite straight to the SB. Without change and improvement the team wouldn’t reach the heights the team aspired to. 

I would move for Fuega or Arnold. If they are gone. I stand and take Barton as a consolation prize(a Stud RG as a consolation prize isn't terrible). Feuga can start at RG until Lane retires(then we have to replace Fuega lol). If I get Arnold,then I try to get Beebe in round 2. he would be a solid RG IMO and we still have time(or another draft or FA) to find Lane's replacement. In any of these scenarios,the team improves. Now the question becomes what is the lift for Fuega or Arnold? And is it worth a round 2 in a stacked draft?

22,50 and a fifth rounder to trade up for 12 is the suggested trade possible scenario

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

22,50 and a fifth rounder to trade up for 12 is the suggested trade possible scenario

I don’t think this gets it done though really. I wouldn’t move back that far just for that if I was the Broncos 

29 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

You just so bent on not holding coaching, gameplanning and playcalling accountable. It’s all up to QB1 to automatically constantly just overcome all these every play every game. Gotcha!

Nah.. just make the basic junior high audible of tweaking protection or a hot route.  According to you, he did it vs Seattle...so we know he is capable. 

Howie loves to move up,then trade back down,picking up a better asset than he gave up on the up move. He can do this multiple times and gather more assets in a stacked draft and he's good at it. I still Like DeJean too. He is probably the best immediate fit, but Arnold has more potential IMO. But we also know Howie has difficulty taking a DB unless there is totally no question he is the BPA when we pick. It would have to be overwhelming in my view for Howie to go DB. Fuega is the best G to T option if you want a 2 fer. Barton is the best G if that's all you are looking for. I would try for Feuga 

34 minutes ago, EaglesAddict said:

Ok, you phrased the question "would you", as in, present tense, lol.  And no, I would not have traded up for him during the draft that we obtained him.

Yes...present tense. Dickerson is a stud.  Arguably our best player.    

So my point... if we can get a stud at RG....absolutely better than just getting a " good" OT.    

The stud G are very rare though...I Agee that I wouldn't trade up for many of them 

48 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

With zero tweak from the mental midget you say plays QB. 

I suggest you find another team to root for Hurts hater.