Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

The Eagles Message Board

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Featured Replies

16 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

I don't care about 2022

That’s exactly what the article stated you agreed with 

  • Replies 62.2k
  • Views 812.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

Posted Images

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

Are either better than Blank? or are you assuming they are not/

Blankenship is the starter.... I don't think after last year, they bring in a guy that you would think is a starter over one of our current starters...to be a backup. 

  • Author

I have no clue what either of their ego's are perhaps you do

  • Author
Just now, joemas6 said:

Blankenship is the starter.... I don't think after last year, they bring in a guy that you would think is a starter over one of our current starters...to be a backup. 

Who did CJG displace? Don't you play the best player?

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

I have no clue what either of their ego's are perhaps you do

You are falling into the trap of " names"

You said we need depth...but then bring up guys who you think would start? 

Which is it?  What are you trying to accomplish?

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

Who did CJG displace? Don't you play the best player?

Byard left... so the spot was open 

4 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Forget the money... which of Simmons or Adams do you think will come in as the humble backup?

Byard was a disaster last year....coming in and trying to be a coach.  Is it coincidence things went South when he got here?

Do you think they make a decision to bring something like that in again....a safety with an ego thinking he is the best and knows it all?

Moving on...

Jamal Adams very clearly would be much more flexible to fit in. Plus I’d believe he’d view this S room as one he could thrive in becoming the best of the bunch.

  • Author

Why did we bring in Bark since we already had Gainwell ? LOL. I mean we should start the guys we already had right?

5 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Are either better than Blank? or are you assuming they are not?

Both I’d say would be the best S on our roster.

  • Author
2 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

You are falling into the trap of " names"

You said we need depth...but then bring up guys who you think would start? 

Which is it?  What are you trying to accomplish?

If there is a better S Blank would be fine as a depth guy for now. I want the best players on the field

  • Author
1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Both I’d say would be the best S on our roster.

Both are too expensive so it's a moot point anyhow

5 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

??... my calendar says 2024.   Why do we care about 2022?

Be very telling if you…or in this case FL believed Hurts was the best QB in the league in 2022. Like that article very clearly stated first off before it went sideways after.

  • Author
Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

Be very telling if you…or in this case FL believed Hurts was the best QB in the league in 2022. Like that article very clearly stated first off before it went sideways after.

So he;s getting worse with time?

5 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

You are falling into the trap of " names"

You said we need depth...but then bring up guys who you think would start? 

Which is it?  What are you trying to accomplish?

Simmons is think would be only taking a starter position to sign. Adams would be more flexible to fit in and have to prove himself. Which I think he totally would and could do for us.

  • Author
8 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

That’s exactly what the article stated you agreed with 

Read the whole thing not just the first line. Ridiculous

  • Author
Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

Read the whole thing not just the first line. Ridiculous

The fall off from 2022 is what he's talking about if you can READ and COMPREHEND

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So he;s getting worse with time?

He suffered in no scheme last season. Plus he clearly suffered injuries last season. Teams caught up with our stale and predictable O. This stuff matters for any player…no matter how much you try to ignore this obvious situation that transpired.

  • Author
2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Simmons is think would be only taking a starter position to sign. Adams would be more flexible to fit in and have to prove himself. Which I think he totally would and could do for us.

Both are too expensive so let's drop this now

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Read the whole thing not just the first line. Ridiculous

Yeah I thought the rest was ridiculous too

7 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Jamal Adams very clearly would be much more flexible to fit in. Plus I’d believe he’d view this S room as one he could thrive in becoming the best of the bunch.

You don't think he would prefer to go a place where he would start?

  • Author
Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

He suffered in no scheme last season. Plus he clearly suffered injuries last season. Teams caught up with our stale and predictable O. This stuff matters for any player…no matter how much you try to ignore this obvious situation that transpired.

I don't care he DIGRESSED and now we want to see him PROgress

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

Both are too expensive so let's drop this now

The Eagles have plenty of money....not about expensive. 

  • Author
3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Yeah I thought the rest was ridiculous too

No what's ridiculous is you clinging to the first line and ignoring what the point of the article was LMAO

  • Author
1 minute ago, joemas6 said:

The Eagles have plenty of money....not about expensive. 

Well if the player is better for us, then Blank would have to be the BU

7 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

If there is a better S Blank would be fine as a depth guy for now. I want the best players on the field

A third S gets plenty of time on the field anyway. But yeah would be nice if we could upgrade and make Blankenship our third S. I see Adams as a very nice complimentary S to CGJ and Milk Check.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.