1 hour ago, Asg 15 said:

So my question is would you rather have a "qualified" head coach who doesn't delay Hurts progression

OR would you rather have 2 SB appearances and one win since Siri's been here?

I'll take the SB all day long

Why are you jumping to assume the more qualified coach achieves less? Terrible assumption. Believe we’d be five years deep into next level mastering a real O. Whole O that’s been together these years completely in sync with each other and the O….no questions about expected duties.

2 hours ago, joemas6 said:

Did you ever look at the resumes.... Siri , Andy, Doug... prior to being hired. Siri’s resume smokes the other 2. Not even close.

Joe, the thing that Ham doesn’t understand is the job of a CEO. He keeps wanting Sirianni to do the job of the COO, and leave the CEO tasks undone. There is a word used to describe that … it is micromanaging. The best CEOs hire people who are better than they are, and the empower them to do great things. That is a perfect description of the relationship between Sirianni and Fangio.

1 hour ago, Asg 15 said:

So my question is would you rather have a "qualified" head coach who doesn't delay Hurts progression

OR would you rather have 2 SB appearances and one win since Siri's been here?

I'll take the SB all day long

I mean you really came close to a great point. But the fact we saw such a leap forward across the O with a single season hiring a decent qualified O mind…just won it all the exact season we got an O mind. Moore nothing totally brilliant. Just qualified. Not sure how we fail to reach the first SB that season either. I mean that was a dream like setup path for us. It really was just the Niners as our only obstacle that entire time.

But ASG you explain to me how developing our O faster while actually possessing the HC we could sustain that consistency with turns into a negative in this scenario? New O every season different playcallers collapsing totally 2023. Or whole O light years advanced perfecting the same O.

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Moore resume without question was superior to Siri in comparison. Not even close. Siri was hired based on Gannon mostly …Steichen quality OC on board also.

Gannon? The coach who threw away the SB LVII win? The coach who screwed the Eagles out of getting Fangio a year sooner? That Gannon?

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I deal with reality instead of lying to myself. I was very straight telling about myself. Just one facet comes out here revolving around it. It’s something I’ve faced my entire life …in everything really. Felt like such a gift….before experience made me so aware of the entirety of what I just know as my life. I have great attributes as well as ridiculous weaknesses also. I at a very early age decided to accept myself and be me.

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Is what it is. Explained it as great and terrible. But …any chance you believe I wasn’t expecting such a response? I get it…from my side of things I’m just being real. Doubt many could relate and understand though. Feels like a fairly unique very complicated personal trait I’ve dealt with/I’ve capitalized on.

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Very knowledgable educated assumption. I’m not Siri best friend to insider exactly know everything at all. But ….you are the one brought up your understanding of Occams Razor….there it is in action being applied for me to form an opinion.

You hit the nail squarely on the head … assumption.

Glad to see you are admitting it. At least your conjecture isn’t accompanied by spin this time. Well done. That is progress.

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Again…I can’t conclude anything but Rosie formulating this concocted plan of scapegoating Desai already having selected the option he’s turning to. Really all on Rosie. He screwed things up pretty bad all over that situation. Had Fangio already in house to succeed Gannon. Reality took a bunch of effort for Rosie to have botched the DC job transfer. Rosie really loved him some Gannon. Telling you…Gannon is the main reason Siri was hired as HC.

And again that conclusion is simply conjecture on your part.

Your constant conjecture is driven by your biases. Those biases drive you to demean others with pejorative cutsie names like Rosie or Pedey. Try showing a little respect and use Roseman or Howie or Pederson or Doug or Joe or Matt. That is simple common courtesy.

19 minutes ago, mattwill said:

Gannon? The coach who threw away the SB LVII win? The coach who screwed the Eagles out of getting Fangio a year sooner? That Gannon?

Exactly…Rosie infatatuation with Gannon. Siri missing out on Fangio over attempting to offer huge money to Gannon just to try and retain him for only one more season. Gannon D performance was embarrassing. AR schooled him like a child.

Gannon became a HC after. AR made that guy look completely outmatched.

40 minutes ago, mattwill said:

Your answer didn’t meet the criteria of the question asked, which was for one or more names that you would propose for the position. You either had the arrogance to believe that answering the question as asked was beneath you OR the cowardice/fear of providing an answer OR both.

I answered a much bigger better question our franchise has faced and will face for years to come. Best answer. Sorry you don’t like it. I had names…that ship sailed. Every season going to be looking for a top O mind with Siri.

Main problem is top O mind is the most coveted coach. So we are setup needing to acquire the hardest thing to get…essentially.

53 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

That was detailed laying out the exact proven track record….not like I’m jumping to this based on a single game or moment…extensive enough sample size to formulate opinions from.

Not a proven track record, but rather leaping to a conclusion. In real life that is called a premature ejaculation on your part.

43 minutes ago, mattwill said:

Your answer didn’t meet the criteria of the question asked, which was for one or more names that you would propose for the position. You either had the arrogance to believe that answering the question as asked was beneath you OR the cowardice/fear of providing an answer OR both.

I answered your question for the past few seasons, current season and future seasons ahead. Names only matter for one season. My answer applies for every season ahead. Gave you much better than just one season answer…gave you entire Siri run here answer.

47 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

No spin any GM can work for firing Siri right after he won it all though. Rosie would get villainized everywhere.

True true.

53 minutes ago, mattwill said:

Reading is fundamental. You blithely skipped over (wantonly ignored) the word "near.”

Sticking with my answer. You going to be required to provide much more to change my opinion than personal weak attacks alluding to it’s my weakness involved instead of your weak opinion going on with this.

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I answered your question for the past few seasons, current season and future seasons ahead. Names only matter for one season. My answer applies for every season ahead. Gave you much better than just one season answer…gave you entire Siri run here answer.

You have NEVER given the name of a human being that you believe meets your criteria. All you have done is repeat the criteria description.

You are a very accomplished obfuscator..

But you saying "near” exactly places it under doubt, no?

Just now, mattwill said:

You have NEVER given the name of a human being that you believe meets your criteria. All you have done is repeat the criteria description.

You are a very accomplished obfuscator..

I’m assisting you by answering a much better version of your question. Patullo OC now. Those names aren’t happening. Helping you realize so much more. This is the infinite Ferris wheel our organization faces with Siri.

Sadly this was the most enticing season to have lured in our best O mind. Patullo could have always been the fall back option after everything else failed. Now won’t even have that anymore.

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Sticking with my answer. You going to be required to provide much more to change my opinion than personal weak attacks alluding to it’s my weakness involved instead of your weak opinion going on with this.

My opinion that a history of 100% confirmation of a set of events over and over and over again is weak? If that is weak what argument for Saquon exceeding 20024 in 2025 is strong? There is none. The historical numbers do not lie.

As fans we can hope for history not to repeat itself, but that is all it is … a hope. And given the wear and tear factor, it probably isn’t a wise hope at that.

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I’m assisting you by answering a much better version of your question. Patullo OC now. Those names aren’t happening. Helping you realize so much more. This is the infinite Ferris wheel our organization faces with Siri.

Your cowardice is only exceeded by your narcissism

48 minutes ago, mattwill said:

I will defer to Joe and NC for whether you have ever given a pecking order of the actual names of human beings who you believed met your criteria. If they can’t corroborate such a list provided by you, then it is up to you to provide the evidence of such a list. If you don’t provide it then you will simply have confirmed yourself as a liar.

Weak and pathetic attempt to discredit me and smear my character. Think about it….you do realize it’s all right here to be dug up going back in time. You confirming me as a liar just speaks on your own character. No MAs faking ignorance to extend any of it just speaks of his character.

5 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

But you saying "near” exactly places it under doubt, no?

No. No doubt. For there to be doubt there would need to be statistical significance of no clear likely outcome. The numbers don’t lie. Any other outcome is statistically insignificant.