Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

Prove you aren’t just some weasel hiding talking tough only on the internet. Give and address or time and place to meet …say that to my face. You have no reason to respond calling me a pathological liar. I answered you…not a single shred of reasoning to think I believe otherwise about Patullo and Siri running the O.

But you’ve earned me understanding you are a weak zero backbone talk tough as long as you are sure you won’t have to face any consequences of your behavior.

I’m a whole lot to deal with. I not only annihilate you with my words and opinions….I can back it up physically if forced to. I’m the worst possible target to mess with. I have friends lawyers and high up…as well as low. I’m in good shape athletic with a brain.

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Prove you aren’t just some weasel hiding talking tough only on the internet. Give and address or time and place to meet …say that to my face. You have no reason to respond calling me a pathological liar. I answered you…not a single shred of reasoning to think I believe otherwise about Patullo and Siri running the O.

But you’ve earned me understanding you are a weak zero backbone talk tough as long as you are sure you won’t have to face any consequences of your behavior.

Davis California. Any time of your choosing. I have met other EMB posters face to face many times coast to coast.

With that said you have 100% control (and ownership) of your lie. All you have to do is respond with names that fit you own criteria. As Andy Reid often said, "Time’s yours”

3 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So every year he needs to be retaught how to change play calls? Really, this is your response? They learn this in Peewees, please stop the coddling

What we clearly witnessed was for the first time he received coaching to do this. No being taught over and over again…just provide a coach with an O to be run qualified. That takes care of the rest. Comes with expectations all understand.

3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I’m a whole lot to deal with. I not only annihilate you with my words and opinions….I can back it up physically if forced to. I’m the worst possible target to mess with. I have friends lawyers and high up…as well as low. I’m in good shape athletic with a brain.

Mirror mirror on the wall who’s the most narcissistic of them all?

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Saquan is certainly doubt. Just because I have educated informed reasoning behind my doubt? Percentage towards probability doesn’t affect whether it’s considered doubt or not.

Once AGAIN(and again and again) we have RB's to help relieve Bark. Less snaps= less yardage usually. I don't see why this shocks you. We have to replace Gains with someone??? Although Bark can be a 3 down back why do you want him to do it when we have other RB's who would like a few snaps since they get paid ????

5 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So every year he needs to be retaught how to change play calls? Really, this is your response? They learn this in Peewees, please stop the coddling

Isn’t this exactly the whole point? Moore just finally provided this most basic element to our O. I agree with peewee backyard just go make a play situation that was provided under Siri. But Siri just isn’t capable. He’s a hard worker and all. But when the whole stadium expects the D to be that play….and Siri calls a terrible play in those circumstances? Much less the next week or ever….providing the answer to counter. Siri answers were escape play hero ball creating the big play. Like Hurts actually accomplished at league high rates. What was the other answer Siri provided? Screen pass. That was it.

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Ok the Moore pay…is purely fan suspicion. Reasoning even behind that completely supports everything I stated. Nobody knows what Moore is being paid. No doubt it’s a raise from OC pay. So hard to base everything over hard financial numbers…when nobody knows those. But I can point to historical precedents when coordinators turned down bad HC jobs. Can’t think of a time any of them had a better situation than Moore had here to stay fit though.

Why is it a bad HC job? It's a PROMOTION for Moore, why would he turn down a promotion?

No retention issue with Hurts. Very coachable hard worker dedicated to football. Those basic elements were just missing for him. No O scheme developed by Siri. Wasn’t rhymes and reasons behind each play with expectations accordingly to the D play. Siri couldn’t share his football wisdoms to his QB he didn’t possess.

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Why is it a bad HC job? It's a PROMOTION for Moore, why would he turn down a promotion?

Especially a promotion that got him a $16 million a year pay raise.

58 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Taking a terrible HC job more likely to kill future opportunities earning. Waiting a year for a better job at half the pay could be viewed as the best chance of career success along with the money.

So no chance a HC can drop back into an OC role if he can't cut it??? Never happens? He's young and has a chance to build a young team HIS WAY

12 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So every year he needs to be retaught how to change play calls? Really, this is your response? They learn this in Peewees, please stop the coddling

Nothing proof more than Siri playcall knowing full well what D was coming. Yet you blame the QB. You’re missing so much key going on in the game.

59 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Look at Siri…hired cheap. Now going to reap crazy mad loot.

Winningest coach in franchise history?

Moore shows up for one season. Wasn’t even calling plays very well. Not like that was so key to success. Hurts consisteny was reading adjusting calling audibles. Two victories in the regular season main three plays were confirmed Hurts audibles.

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Look at Siri…hired cheap. Now going to reap crazy mad loot.

Cheap for 5 years, 2 SB appearances and one Lombardi. Who else has a better record here? Shouldn't he deserve to get paid like you'd pay someone like Q when it's time? Did Hurts deserve to get paid after 5 years?

59 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

But yes admittedly based on my own opinions. In my head? I feel like I’m right. But I’m not just throwing out these opinions based on emotional or other reasoning. I’m formulating educated assumptions and conclusions based on what has occurred. Frankly I can’t understand any other conclusion being reached here.

Name the person we should have hired

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Winningest coach in franchise history?

So all that you blame the QB for problems he just can’t do and his flaws…all completely change to him proving capable and executing one season provided with Moore. Hmmmm….Moore isn’t some genius O mind even…just qualified experienced and capable pro O coach.

No way we’ll ever be able to prove otherwise….Hurts and our O been stuck under Siri the whole time. Plenty to backup Siri performance with winning and scoring. Yet …were they really capable of so much more the entire time? That’s my opinion. Talented roster overcoming…

52 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

First. You didn’t say that. My whole stickler surrounded that you didn’t define it as a goal. Goal I never would have responded against even. Problem being you always placed near everything so heavily on stats. But your original statement wasn’t a goal of 31 points…that one word addition completely changed your original statement. Goal is fine…whatever. My whole point was always about winning. I differed over putting up any certain stat as defining. More points than the other guy. Win. Which 31 points can go a long ways towards accomplishing. But…a couple minutes left leading…kill the clock…take a knee…ice the win. Don’t chase scoring 31 points or scoring as much as possible to give the opponent a chance to come back.

LOL 31 PPG is a goal whether I have to state it's a goal or not, how dumb are you right now? if I said "I'm working towards a masters degree" normal people would understand that is a goal I have,but somehow this escapes you and BTW I said it was a GOAL. "I want 31 PPG from our offense" is what I said and if you are too stupid to understand that is a goal I have for our offense I have no words for you. Just moronic

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

No way we’ll ever be able to prove otherwise….Hurts and our O been stuck under Siri the whole time. Plenty to backup Siri performance with winning and scoring. Yet …were they really capable of so much more the entire time? That’s my opinion. Talented roster overcoming…

Which exactly negates your basis for our success…all about how talented is our roster? Talented enough to be 10-1 just street ball making plays against pro defenders expecting that is our play.

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Don’t chase scoring 31 points or scoring as much as possible to give the opponent a chance to come back.

That's what we do,I already laid that out in a previous post if you bother to read them

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Which exactly negates your basis for our success…all about how talented is our roster? Talented enough to be 10-1 just street ball making plays against pro defenders expecting that is our play.

Pointless drivel

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Exactly. If wins and losses revolved around scripted gameplans we would be the worst team in the league. Pure proof of how this whole time everyone has been overcoming Siri X and O weakness to achieve.

If the game was 15 minutes you'd have a point, otherwise it's another fail

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

LOL 31 PPG is a goal whether I have to state it's a goal or not, how dumb are you right now? if I said "I'm working towards a masters degree" normal people would understand that is a goal I have,but somehow this escapes you and BTW I said it was a GOAL. "I want 31 PPG from our offense" is what I said and if you are too stupid to understand that is a goal I have for our offense no words for you. Just moronic

You are changing it to make perfect sense. Which of that was the original case I never would have responded at all like I did. The whole issue was the difference of a single word …but with you I wasn’t just nitpicking…actually believed it wasn’t just an unspoken word but your insistence towards stat relevance and effects. No problem understanding. You misspoke….only issues I disagreed with. Goal of scoring 44 last season I wouldn’t get on you for.

58 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

You didn’t say goal…I didn’t say impossible to score 31. I pointed out how EXPE TACTIONS or being disappointed of failure not being the highest scoring basically just wasn’t super realistic expectation. Different than goal…your adjustment to goal since ..just proving my original point is all.

Liar

20 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I’m a whole lot to deal with. I not only annihilate you with my words and opinions….I can back it up physically if forced to. I’m the worst possible target to mess with. I have friends lawyers and high up…as well as low. I’m in good shape athletic with a brain.

You can't annihilate anyone when you never answer a direct simple question. You don't engage in conversations. Otherwise you would answer simple questions instead of 300 word essays as posts.