29 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Heck of a good GM. But epic failures chasing QBs has just been his downfall. Gotta complete the puzzle. He can’t. All those picks for Trey Lance was just terrible. Just total reach.

So reaching makes a "heck of a good GM"? Nice to know

30 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Bottom line... our best 2 CBs will get paid as such.

The role thar each had last year should expand...because they were only rookies last year.

Mitchell... they need to expand his role into a CB that travels with the #1.... left, right , inside and outside

DeJean...needs to be the #2 that stays on the field in a rare 2 CB set. Those 7 or 8 snaps per game!

Expanding on their regular roles from last year.

Then they fill in the other spot accordingly

What this does...is adds versatility while keeping the best players on the field... in the best matchups!

Really not rocket science

No rocket science in Hamityville. They just now figured out paper airplanes

49 minutes ago, mattwill said:

Tanner is indeed the longer term Eagles development. With that said Pickett didn’t get in Tanner’s way at all. Where he is now is exactly the same as where he would be if Pickett had not been on the team. He is QB2 and he would have been QB2.

Pay attention here. We had Pickett second string over the guy we already had. Ditched Pickett for Tanner to be number 2. That is as clear as things get that Tanner was actually the better number two in our organizations mind all along.

54 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Tanner would have developed more and gained more experience without Pickett. Plus clearly Tanner was better than Pickett. Exactly why we traded him away. But trade for Pickett forced us in our Super Season to play and turn to Pickett over Tanner. Which was clearly the lesser guy, forced to go to what deserved to be our third string QB

But did that change Tanner’s trajectory? Would he be in a different place now? Would the Eagles be in a different place now?

Further, after QB1 got injured and QB2 came in and got injured as well so we went to QB3. If Pickett is not here, who would have been QB3, and would that have affected the season record?

51 minutes ago, mattwill said:

Tanner is indeed the longer term Eagles development. With that said Pickett didn’t get in Tanner’s way at all. Where he is now is exactly the same as where he would be if Pickett had not been on the team. He is QB2 and he would have been QB2.

You are saying because it didn’t actually cost us….so what?

51 minutes ago, mattwill said:

None of his clones using a light box and a Rover/Monster.

You crazy

58 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Fangio pleaded to the media that he wanted DeJean to remain inside

Pleaded? What role does the media play in any Eagles roster decision?

24 minutes ago, mattwill said:

How is it affecting you?

OH NO you opened up another 65 posts LOL

58 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Because it’s effecting our entire D.

How is what DeJean is paid having any effect on the entire Defense?

57 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Fangio wants the disguise features and versatility. Inside Fangio can really mix things up. Plenty he can teach Coop there still.

None of that has anything to do with DeJean’s contract or what DeJean is being paid. Nothing at all. Nada.

57 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Keep going. First rounders? How often are outside CBs taken first two days of the draft versus Slot CB?

Irrelevant. Second contracts are not based on where a player was drafted, but rather on the quality of their play on the field during their 3 or 4 years in the NFL.

56 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I think talent kind of too weak. Too many teams.

The continuously growing NFL audience disagrees with you.

16 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

2002...the NFL Expanded to 32 teams...there was absolutely some high quality level seasons in there...but I agree not so much lately. But I don’t think it's that the talent went down from then. Definitely rush jobs trying to build winners too quickly. Throwing guys in when not ready....and some just poor jobs building rosters.

I also think the schemes have gotten influenced by college ball in order to rush QBs etc. Not good for the quality of the game IMO.

Quality takes time. Some never get there(Browns). TB was 0-16 their first season as creamsicles. Browns were one of the original teams, but we wouldn't expand the market when they suck annually? Actually the Browns sucking was how the Bengals were formed and the Browns moved to Baltimore. I know I lived through it

17 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

No anger. Just ditched Pickett for Tanner. Proving we were being held hostage by that trade some. Forced to have Pickett numnber two when clearly we believed in the guy we already had more.

🤣

45 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Lynch killed it plenty and got a long term great O mind as HC. Clearly been nailing DCs the whole time.

And his teams have won how many Super Bowls?

17 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Was this referring to Saquan? Yeah OPOY…best NFL player….making backup money at other positions.

UGH players can accept or not accept what is offered to them. No one forced Bark to take our deal. He wanted to play for a team with a title shot before he was wasted in NY. What value does a SB ring have?

45 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Dude you just acting like you were born yesterday. Past can only be written by how it can be dug up years later.

Go look at the video. Listen to what Philly Mike says about the score and which team was on the field with its Offense and which with its Defense. Your own evidence skewers you. That and the fact that Howie builds the trenches.

You really need to do better.

17 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Pay attention here. We had Pickett second string over the guy we already had. Ditched Pickett for Tanner to be number 2. That is as clear as things get that Tanner was actually the better number two in our organizations mind all along.

Conjecture since Tanner was UNPROVEN before the season began,

46 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

It was every single Eagles fan whole understanding that Rosie was collecting those First round picks looking to go big for a QB.

Pursue your delusion. Clouds are light and fluffy like brain matter is. You’ll never notice the difference. Be sure to say hello to the Cheshire Cat.

33 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Pleaded LMFAO. since when does the media make team decisions? A Hamityville classic

33 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Yeah it’s going on until he’s extended. So year two really just the first tiny least important glimpse of the issue.

What issue? Has anyone other than you indicated that there is an issue?

33 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

No anger. Just ditched Pickett for Tanner. Proving we were being held hostage by that trade some. Forced to have Pickett numnber two when clearly we believed in the guy we already had more.

How has Tanner’s current status been affected in any way by Pickett having been an Eagle in 2024?

32 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Because he’s forcing to get snaps outside. Just smart obvious good business. Instead Fangio wanted him inside becoming that ultimate chess piece.

He is only forcing in your mind. You are the only person who is obsessing over what might happen in three years. Fangio and DeJean are both focused on winning NOW.

33 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Pay attention here. We had Pickett second string over the guy we already had. Ditched Pickett for Tanner to be number 2. That is as clear as things get that Tanner was actually the better number two in our organizations mind all along.

And how has that piece of history that "Tanner was actually the better number two” affected either Tanner’s current status or the Eagles’ current status?

You are seeing demons where there aren’t any. The expression "no harm, no foul” applies.

You haven’t answered the question I asked you, "Do you have car insurance?”

1 hour ago, joemas6 said:

By luck.... that's what you said for years because Howie didn't get him in March...so it was luck. The " master plan" must be completed by the draft.

Every point you make against me is trying to add words in my mouth. Poorly…without making any real point of case otherwise