4 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

SO no answer yet again,got it

Yeah…you’ll be needing to raise your standard to much higher level of questioning.

2 hours ago, joemas6 said:

Right, he couldn't ban the tush push... so how is going to ban something that benefits all the owners?

You need to actually look into this much more. It’s effecting the balance of the league. It is an advantage for us…because of Lurie. You seem to miss plenty of what occurs with our organization so much. You endlessly heap praise on Rosie…when really this is more about the liquid cash money Lurie makes available. All owners and teams are dealing with the same cap. That part I don’t think is really much of an issue for majority of teams. Seems a franchise here and there struggle some just with this part of the financials…many times just due to extra crap going on around everything with the ownership and/or team financials.

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

You need to actually look into this much more. It’s effecting the balance of the league. It is an advantage for us…because of Lurie. You seem to miss plenty of what occurs with our organization so much. You endlessly heap praise on Rosie…when really this is more about the liquid cash money Lurie makes available. All owners and teams are dealing with the same cap. That part I don’t think is really much of an issue for majority of teams. Seems a franchise here and there struggle some just with this part of the financials…many times just due to extra crap going on around everything with the ownership and/or team financials.

Things have changed..even the Packers and Steelers were forced to adapt to compete financially. Rams and Eagles are prime examples of ownership franchises capable of scratching together those extra levels of liquid cash. We have a huge financial pocket protector numbers and contracts department of employees working for the Eagles. Lurie feels real involved with an understanding about gaining an advantage doing this. Organizations need to actually have liquid available funds for these signing bonuses instantly.

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

Things have changed..even the Packers and Steelers were forced to adapt to compete financially. Rams and Eagles are prime examples of ownership franchises capable of scratching together those extra levels of liquid cash. We have a huge financial pocket protector numbers and contracts department of employees working for the Eagles. Lurie feels real involved with an understanding about gaining an advantage doing this. Organizations need to actually have liquid available funds for these signing bonuses instantly.

We really utilize other bonus cash chunks in these contracts also. Especially bigger contracts. Especially works great for those first contract extension deals. Believe there is direct correlation between the character and player types we’ve been focused on collecting and building with lately. Retain quality rookies by extending them with a chunk of signing bonuses instant money. Hitting these athletes early with that cash on extending helps. They haven’t made that real NFL money yet. So get a good life changing chunk of change in their bank accounts as early as it’s possible. Then put in a Roster Bonus or equal way to back up the next year with another big chunk of cash payout.

Athletes that aren’t super greedy and manage financials serviceably this method can work for.

Then you have the opposite spectrum from those rookies first extensions…those older retiring stud vets. Get them those straight cash deals they can’t refuse. One year contract with void years backloading the cap hit.

44 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

LMAO I love how you bash the questioner when you refuse to answer a question ,like it's their fault you won't answer HAHAHAHA. Just more comedic value. You need t take it on the road. Now comes the change of subject or completely ignoring the question, until we ask it again in 3 years

I didn’t ignore it…flat told you not worthy of my answer.

17 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

I can't get UNDER your standards. it was a simple straightforward question. Your droning on about worthless things is a far lower standard than I can get under Instead just refuse to answer the question, it's what you do and if you were in my ompany(or any other) you'd be fired immediately. Just ridiculous dodging, deflection and denial

Fine..what was this deep thought of a question you are pondering that’s you feel is such a great question again? I’ll answer it…just for your sake. No idea why you’d drone on about whatever it was?

20 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So Ham are you going to answer this question?

No I would not trade Saquan for Miles. Duhh…Saquan is far superior. Answered this terrible question everybody knows the obvious and easy answer to. Hope that makes you happy…or assists whatever you needed from me by answering.

52 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I didn’t ignore it…flat told you not worthy of my answer.

Why not? Both questions look like a good questions to me. The first one requires a fair amount of speculation, but the second one is straightforward. Hearing your thoughts would be interesting.

How many yards was Barkley denied playing with the Gnats trash O line? He was basically their entire offense.

So would you trade Barkley for Sanders even up? Why or why not?

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I didn’t ignore it…flat told you not worthy of my answer.

That isn’t a collaborative approach to participation in this thread. What is your objective to collaboration?

1 hour ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

14-3 just horrendous, really you need to be on the 9ers board

That team…considering the personnel also….should in anyway be least capable scoring team in the first quarter of anybody?

35 minutes ago, mattwill said:

Why not? Both questions look like a good questions to me. The first one requires a fair amount of speculation, but the second one is straightforward. Hearing your thoughts would be interesting.

How many yards was Barkley denied playing with the Gnats trash O line? He was basically their entire offense.

So would you trade Barkley for Sanders even up? Why or why not?

Terrible questions…not even anything questionable. Miles for Saquan isn’t even debatable or questionable trade.

Now…Saquan for TJ Watt? That could be an interesting trade

35 minutes ago, mattwill said:

That isn’t a collaborative approach to participation in this thread. What is your objective to collaboration?

Ok…so I succumb and answered the terrible question…the obvious answer everybody already knew.

2 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

No I would not trade Saquan for Miles. Duhh…Saquan is far superior. Answered this terrible question everybody knows the obvious and easy answer to. Hope that makes you happy…or assists whatever you needed from me by answering.

What is your reasoning and why do you continue to support Sanders if the answers is "obvious" Why bring Sanders up at all???

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

That team…considering the personnel also….should in anyway be least capable scoring team in the first quarter of anybody?

Still clueless as to what a feel out process is. You've never watched boxing in your life. Thanks for finally answering, SOOOOOO hard to do. We could have saved 20 posts if you'd just do this first LOL

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Terrible questions…not even anything questionable. Miles for Saquan isn’t even debatable or questionable trade.

It is my understanding you have been pimping Miles for pretty much the last two/three seasons. Do I have that wrong?

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

That team…considering the personnel also….should in anyway be least capable scoring team in the first quarter of anybody?

Does it matter who wins the first 15 minutes???? Or does it matter who leads at the end. GO slow, you can do it

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Ok…so I succumb and answered the terrible question…the obvious answer everybody already knew.

That was big hearted of you. Good to see that side of you.

11 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

LOL because you're in a corner now and you'd have to commit to an answer, no dodging or BS HAHAHA. Really juvenile

Hahaha…if you think something so weak and pathetic as that has me cornered? You’ve never met any beast like me…nothing close.

11 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

You have said(before) Sanders was a "special talent", but Barkley choked. Then to back it up(apparently) you posted that Sanders had more YPC(by some miniscule amount) than Barkely. So the question was, would you trade Sanders for Barkley even up? Then, explain your reasoning and why Sanders fell off the cliff AFTER he left here yet Barkley exceeded his days with the Gnats.

Barkley did choke. Sanders choked even harder in the SB than Barkley did though. Sanders wasn’t even to be trusted on the field in the SB anymore after trying to fumble the ball away twice right in the beggining. I didn’t say Sanders was so special. Your confusion stems from your belief that Gainwell was starter worthy in any committee backfield. I just pointed out my observations with our prioritized created advantage our team was built on….dominant monster run blocking Oline. Mailata, Dickerson and Lane deliver crushing huge gaping hole pancake run blocks every game. So it’s important to take full advantage of those. Sanders just had that explosive ability to do so. Give a nice hole/lane to run? Sanders could take it to the house….of at least a huge gain. But Gainwell? Those opportunities the run blocking created time to time he just would turn into a first down producing run…instead of a 70 yard TD strike.

Let’s just go ahead and evaluate my words and opinions now in hindsight from years ago about this situation. Seemed clear to me then….but obviously not to all(especially right here). What would you say you witnessed this last season from Saquan? Was he a RB that took advantage of these opportunities created?

Let’s assess your opinions occurring countering my thoughts a few seasons back. You claimed committee approach was the way. You stated over and over …”RB doesn’t matter. It’s all Oline.” You even favored Gainwell to start the RB committee as being the answers for us. Didn’t want to pay a RB…or really value a RB much at all(understatement in fact). So did adding Saquan,the elite RB, make a difference? Was it all just Oline…like you preached? Like you still harp on in #HurtsHater attempts.

Offensive player of the year, greatest all time rushing season,7 rushes over 40 yards, Lombardi