25 minutes ago, mattwill said:

From a roster management perspective it would be nice to have a return specialist who (like DeJean) can productively play a position.

I feel ASmith or Coop can do that. They really put pressure on Avery(Williams),who really can't do alot other than a ST returner. If those WR's have another nice game it will he hard to keep Avery IMO

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Believe it was on both sides. Rumor is Adoree was Rosie guy and not Fangio. Carroll and Jacori was sounding like he was on the roster bubble. Raiders kicking their big injured expensive DT left a big need for them. Pretty likely Jacori was Fangio getting his guy instead of trusted Rosie guy in Adoree. Main takeaway most likely is Ringo crapped the bed on his big chance this season. Thought he had the juice….measurables are great…but height, speed….nothing trumps football player.

All good points. Some of it we will never know the whole story.

Regarding Ringo some folks are saying that film review of him will show one atrocious play, but (perhaps) the rest of his plays will not show horribly in the film review.

It is clearly a work in process.

1 hour ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So who is DT4 if not Ty?

Hall and Young are in the conversation. Sykes looked good Thursday, but only Practice Squad good.

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

You passing on two second rounders?

Depends on where in Round 2 those picks are.

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Really different players and positions to be honest. Booker more Nose and short yardage. Ty possibly DE, DT.

I agree. The two UFL DTs are closer to being Nose backups.

31 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

IDK we will have to cut guys with alot of potential. What is the point of adding even more guys you will have to cut with potential? It's not like we're starved for draft picks

We are not starved, but the bulk of them are Round 3 and below.

5 minutes ago, mattwill said:

We are not starved, but the bulk of them are Round 3 and below.

Not really against numbers of quality guys first two days of the draft at all. Or draft ammo to move up. Or gives the ability to trade a player replaced with draft pick. Just options …all the way around.

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I get it. But…with that extra ammo can we nail down a longer dynasty dominant push?

IDK that we have had difficulty the last 5 years? We been increasing dominance the last 2

26 minutes ago, mattwill said:

We are not starved, but the bulk of them are Round 3 and below.

So what 4 position are we in need of getting for the next 2-3 years? Who are you getting rid of?

35 minutes ago, mattwill said:

Hall and Young are in the conversation. Sykes looked good Thursday, but only Practice Squad good.

Ty is listed as DT4. It's his job to lose at this point(which is possible)

28 minutes ago, mattwill said:

We are not starved, but the bulk of them are Round 3 and below.

So I assume one would want a 2 next draft and a 2 in 'the following one,which gives you 1,2,2 and a bunch of 3rds that can parleyed into another 2 if needed.but what is needed? Of course we don't know that yet,but it seems pointless to draft more guys so you can cut more talent hoping them are better. So you'd have possibly 3 starter talents,so which 3 do you want to replace? Alot of talent we have was gotten after round 2 as well. There is no reason to stock 90 guys because you can only play 53(plus PS)

26 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Not really against numbers of quality guys first two days of the draft at all. Or draft ammo to move up. Or gives the ability to trade a player replaced with draft pick. Just options …all the way around.

So who are you replacing next year due to a high draft pick?

Alot of our skill position players are locked in for a next 2-3 years

6 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So what 4 position are we in need of getting for the next 2-3 years? Who are you getting rid of?

I’m on the road driving from Colorado back to California, so my answer will be without access to the contracts info needed to give a thorough answer, but in broad brushstrokes I suspect that the existence of the Cap will mean we see a repeat of 2025 Free Agency each year from 2027 onward. So Saquon’s contract will be up and he (probably) will need to be replaced. That is just an example. The list of expiring contracts will tell the story.

7 minutes ago, mattwill said:

I’m on the road driving from Colorado back to California, so my answer will be without access to the contracts info needed to give a thorough answer, but in broad brushstrokes I suspect that the existence of the Cap will mean we see a repeat of 2025 Free Agency each year from 2027 onward. So Saquon’s contract will be up and he (probably) will need to be replaced. That is just an example. The list of expiring contracts will tell the story.

Yeah we're in the window. One or 2 will not be renewed but that is 2 years away. I suppose TE would be one,but weak prospects in the draft. We could hold a team hostage for on of theirs for a pick I guess. Drive safely

Jihad is excellent at attacking Oline and shedding them with his arms. Fantastic technique

11 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So what 4 position are we in need of getting for the next 2-3 years? Who are you getting rid of?

RT,RG, TE, S, CB

Would you really be upset if we got that the first two days next draft?

14 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So who is DT4 if not Ty?

Vic stated Gabe Hall was a perfect utilization of PS last season. But you aren’t getting that these aren’t the same players just because they play Dline.

5 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

RT,RG, TE, S, CB

Would you really be upset if we got that the first two days next draft?

For now we seem high on Steen not sure we see a RG drafted unless he is absolutely terrible this season.

CB- also seems unlikely after just investing in Q and Coop

S- again unlikely just drafted the kid from Texas and Blank isn’t going anywhere.

T and TE seem fairly obvious…. DL image would be high on the list especially edge rusher. WR could be pretty high depending how WR3 plays out this season.

6 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

RT,RG, TE, S, CB

Would you really be upset if we got that the first two days next draft?

Of course I would not be upset ,but which players are you sheet canning for them who's contract expires after this year?? If I'm spending all of those 5 picks the first 2 days they will all start for me

6 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Vic stated Gabe Hall was a perfect utilization of PS last season. But you aren’t getting that these aren’t the same players just because they play Dline.

The point is Booker was expendable for arguably a possible starting CB. Now we need to see this new CB play. I suspect we will this next pre game so he can get his feet with with w new org. Booker is gone, move on..........and if Ringo can't clean up his act,maybe it was a good move. Jury still out on that

https://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/team/depth-chart UNofficial but complied by people close to the Eagles

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

https://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/team/depth-chart UNofficial but complied by people close to the Eagles

I don't personally see the need for rostering 10 WR's,I would hope they cut that back and keep MJ and Scandrick at least on the PS. I really hope to see MJ in pre 2 or he could be at risk of being canned

https://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/news/philadelphia-eagles-training-camp-daily-updates

lol how are we still talking about booker the dude was expendable we wouldn’t have traded him if we felt like he was a huge part of the DL rotation. Very clear we seen other guys as more valuable