37 minutes ago, Crazy Legs said:

The Colts might be in a quandry. They possess two premium first round picks at QB that do not demonstrate the capability to lead a successfull offense.

What are they thinking? What are they getting for over $23M in cap space this season?

Just suppose Howie were to get an inquiry regarding McKee's availability? What response do you think he would give?

What would YOU want?

If Hurts remains healthy, McKee is merely a very fortunate insurance policy...both cheap and talented...possibly for the next two seasons.

Ty Warren was another highly talented and premium prospect. He could possibly develop into a perennial All-Pro. How often do they come allong? Who will our TE be next season?

I'm just saying...

I’m listening. Feel like now we are beyond "suppose Rosie gets a call inquiring”….I’ve moved well beyond to Rosie maximizing the bidding war. You’re on a quality idea…wouldn’t stop there…gotta weigh the multiple potential trade option ideas. Could make a case for more than just Indy being interested in McKee…right now. We need a top negotiator to force the most desperate….oh we got the right guy to make this happen. GM…get GMing. Dickerson’s injury has me considering a G…or heck a C. Dickerson was our best G or C I’d argue. Sorry bad thoughts…bad JuJu….but does put to the forefront the understanding of injuries are going to happen….whoever…whatever position…..throw it on potential McKee trade returns. Quentin Nelson from the Colts? 🤤🤑😼Just how sick would that be? Imagine if Dickerson was only out a little while and we had both? We could lose Saquan and have Shipley break the all time rushing record Saquan set last season. We would reverse NFL evolution…ok ok..let me slow down….the possibilities are exciting to consider. What can we get for giving you a franchise QB…under contract for two years dirt cheap? VALUABLE VALUABLE VALUABLE!!!!! It’s all aligned….age, quality, contract, position….QB factory struck gold….AGAIN!!!!

10 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I gotta think on this idea. Trade them their starting QB and several high picks for Warren…hmmm…I do really like Warren….but feels like giving up way too much here. We’re discussing possibly even trading McKee for two second round picks…after that very strong PS game and the offseason where we ditched Pickett clearly showing how impressed we are with McKee.

4 second round picks and 3 third round picks. Think I’d rather take my chances swinging with 7 day two draft picks.

I look at it this way

If a team wants McKee it's to be a starter

What is a team willing to give up to get a starting QB?

I'd say a 1st isn't out of the question and if no one wants to pay it the Eagles have a really good back up QB

1 minute ago, Asg 15 said:

I look at it this way

If a team wants McKee it's to be a starter

What is a team willing to give up to get a starting QB?

I'd say a 1st isn't out of the question and if no one wants to pay it the Eagles have a really good back up QB

It’s better than just that. Starting QB…not making 55 million per season. DIRT CHEAP ..starting QB under contract for two seasons that’s young and full of potential.

3 minutes ago, Asg 15 said:

I look at it this way

If a team wants McKee it's to be a starter

What is a team willing to give up to get a starting QB?

I'd say a 1st isn't out of the question and if no one wants to pay it the Eagles have a really good back up QB

If a starting QB is worth a first round pick..then I’d say saving 40 million on acquiring this starting QB could also be worth a first round pick. I don’t know..it’s very valuable…any which way you look at absolutely everything aligning with our QB factory production.

Im borderline getting out of control here…or am I? It’s potentially a dream trade opportunity for a franchise. What did the Niners give up so they could draft Lance the done nothing ever QB? Teams been trading a mint to get hold of a starting QB…they have to open up the vault for. McKee can’t even be paid yet. Some lucky franchise gets a whole season dirt cheap to actually figure out all that before requiring that next step investment. Value..value…cha ching..cha ching

Jalen Hurts, Kenny Pickett, Tanner McKee, DTR, McCord…moved out Pickett…about to move out McKee…got Hurts bringing home Lombardis…DTR come along playing the best ball of his career…McCord already in the building next…..winning championships while adding future draft picks to the arsenal…THAT’S WHERE EAGLES ARE AT!!!!! We got here brothers!!

Could it be possible that the lesser QB is actually better option as our backup QB? DTR maybe not as good as McKee right now…but maybe could be argued has a higher potential ceiling than McKee. More importantly for our specific situation…DTR could be argued as the better fit. Like the O could remain the same without drastic adaptation any moments we need DTR to come in for short term needs. Starter goes down for the season? You could change up the entire O to fit next QB. But you don’t want to do all that just for one or two games.

2 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Yeah some of that was a bit fortunate however. Pickett was the lesser option of the two. Like I was telling you all along…but was locked in ahead of McKee. So many possible scenarios where that actually could have backfired on us if things didn’t play out the way they did last season. But then…now you don’t want to trade away our number two. It would be so much easier to do if….now Rosie didn’t trade away Pickett for peanuts. So really back to back dumb moves by Rosie with Pickett. But…he got DTR in the deal. So….if DTR keeps stepping up like he has been? Then it makes the McKee much easier to part with. Hope that scenario works out.

Glad you are on board finally with McKee…but unfortunately…like usual….you’re too late. He’s gone with just medium play this next PS game.

It was fortunate that Pickett played well?

2 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Yeah some of that was a bit fortunate however. Pickett was the lesser option of the two. Like I was telling you all along…but was locked in ahead of McKee. So many possible scenarios where that actually could have backfired on us if things didn’t play out the way they did last season. But then…now you don’t want to trade away our number two. It would be so much easier to do if….now Rosie didn’t trade away Pickett for peanuts. So really back to back dumb moves by Rosie with Pickett. But…he got DTR in the deal. So….if DTR keeps stepping up like he has been? Then it makes the McKee much easier to part with. Hope that scenario works out.

Glad you are on board finally with McKee…but unfortunately…like usual….you’re too late. He’s gone with just medium play this next PS game.

Your are an absolute A$$..... when it comes the the agenda against Howie. An absolute A$$

2 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Yeah some of that was a bit fortunate however. Pickett was the lesser option of the two. Like I was telling you all along…but was locked in ahead of McKee. So many possible scenarios where that actually could have backfired on us if things didn’t play out the way they did last season. But then…now you don’t want to trade away our number two. It would be so much easier to do if….now Rosie didn’t trade away Pickett for peanuts. So really back to back dumb moves by Rosie with Pickett. But…he got DTR in the deal. So….if DTR keeps stepping up like he has been? Then it makes the McKee much easier to part with. Hope that scenario works out.

Glad you are on board finally with McKee…but unfortunately…like usual….you’re too late. He’s gone with just medium play this next PS game.

Why do you want to " part" with McKee???? Why are you in such a rush to get rid of him? It's ideal to have a quality backup QB at minimum $$$ and team control for 2 years.

Lets say you play out the situation all the way.... every time..... then look.... you keep McKee another 2 years... he signs with a team in 2027... you get a comp pick in 2028. Why is that bad? Yuo have his services for 2 more years.... then lets say the same thing with McCord.... he plays all the way here and signs in 2029 with another team and we get a 2030 comp pick...

You have your cheap quality backup QB all the way until 2030... and you get 2 comp picks. Why is that a problem?

You imagine how much more you can do with a roster not having to pay legit backup QB money???? With a rolling cap! Lets just say $5 million without inflation.... from 2025 to 2029... 5 seasons that's $25 mil you save.... but we all know it's way more than that. And add the inflation. Then ask yourself... are you" all in" like you say.... but then why would you want to give up a quality #2 QB? Makes zero sense

27 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Could it be possible that the lesser QB is actually better option as our backup QB? DTR maybe not as good as McKee right now…but maybe could be argued has a higher potential ceiling than McKee. More importantly for our specific situation…DTR could be argued as the better fit. Like the O could remain the same without drastic adaptation any moments we need DTR to come in for short term needs. Starter goes down for the season? You could change up the entire O to fit next QB. But you don’t want to do all that just for one or two games.

Maybe " Rosie" should learn from the great John Lynch on how to invest in QB?

8 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

It was fortunate that Pickett played well?

It was fortunate the lesser QB we didn’t need that was forced ahead of the better option we already possessed wasn’t needed to play a larger role. Actually made a trade to make us a lesser team. Locked in our third best QB as the guy coming in as number two.

1 minute ago, joemas6 said:

Why do you want to " part" with McKee???? Why are you in such a rush to get rid of him? It's ideal to have a quality backup QB at minimum $$$ and team control for 2 years.

Lets say you play out the situation all the way.... every time..... then look.... you keep McKee another 2 years... he signs with a team in 2027... you get a comp pick in 2028. Why is that bad? Yuo have his services for 2 more years.... then lets say the same thing with McCord.... he plays all the way here and signs in 2029 with another team and we get a 2030 comp pick...

You have your cheap quality backup QB all the way until 2030... and you get 2 comp picks. Why is that a problem?

You imagine how much more you can do with a roster not having to pay legit backup QB money???? With a rolling cap! Lets just say $5 million without inflation.... from 2025 to 2029... 5 seasons that's $25 mil you save.... but we all know it's way more than that. And add the inflation. Then ask yourself... are you" all in" like you say.... but then why would you want to give up a quality #2 QB? Makes zero sense

Why are you closing your mind to reaping the rewards of the QB Factory?

54 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Im borderline getting out of control here…or am I?

You finally getting it. Congrats

Great conversation with yourself... maybe you could actually listen to yourself since you don't seem to listen to anyone else.

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

It was fortunate the lesser QB we didn’t need that was forced ahead of the better option we already possessed wasn’t needed to play a larger role. Actually made a trade to make us a lesser team. Locked in our third best QB as the guy coming in as number two.

Why are you closing your mind to reaping the rewards of the QB Factory?

Do you want to win or not?

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

It was fortunate the lesser QB we didn’t need that was forced ahead of the better option we already possessed wasn’t needed to play a larger role. Actually made a trade to make us a lesser team. Locked in our third best QB as the guy coming in as number two.

Why are you closing your mind to reaping the rewards of the QB Factory?

An absolute @$$

You in one breath defending pushing McKee back to third string…then the next breath aren’t willing to consider cashing in on your third string QB.

1 minute ago, joemas6 said:

You finally getting it. Congrats

Great conversation with yourself... maybe you could actually listen to yourself since you don't seem to listen to anyone else.

Seems like I listen and consider almost every word posted here instead. Even respond to much of it as proof for others…would say proof to you…but that obviously isn’t to be accomplished.

6 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Maybe " Rosie" should learn from the great John Lynch on how to invest in QB?

John Lynch pulled off trading bringing in the greatest LT of all time. QB? didn’t Lynch find his Franchise QB as Mr Irrelevant…that’s something. I’ll stick with Lurie QB Factory though. Go Birds!!!!

5 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

An absolute @$$

Told you all along McKee was better than what Rosie forced in ahead of him in Pickett. It wasn’t just me…actually would say it was the majority of Eagles fans felt this way in fact…just not you.

11 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Or you could look at it as Booker was clearly the DT that Pete Carroll valued enough to make the trade happen so we could try and fix an identified weak spot at outside CB. Carroll has to be given top respect for how he views D. So the guy he chose to prioritize getting most likely the best of the bunch…right now today anyway…though Booker is really full of nothing but potential having barely played so far. Ty…we drafted and weren’t trading. As high of potential as any of the non starters.

So I’m viewing things practically completely opposite from your take on this one. The others didn’t have trade value.

Now…will clearly note how Fangio pointed out Gabe Hall was the model of how to work the PS. Seems like Fangio straight out told us he’s making the team and going to be the guy he’ll turn to…you know as well as whatever development he can get from Ty along the way.

objects are only worth what someone will pay. Why would I value Pete Carroll's views and give him "top respect" over those of Fangio? Fangio will do for the Eagles, not because Carroll wants a player we have. I would respect Carroll if he shuts down our entire offense,not before then

22 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

You in one breath defending pushing McKee back to third string…then the next breath aren’t willing to consider cashing in on your third string QB.

WTF are you talking about???

11 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

An absolute @$$

This is fact without room for debate. Catch up dude…Rosie even ditched Pickett admitting his own mistake. You’re the only one holding on trying to defend Rosie as absolutely always perfect. He’s doing a great job. Makes mistakes. Pickett, Huff, Bradberry resigning…the moves we find out are the most purely Rosie controlled ideas. Baun…he identified as being a great pass rushing option…it wasn’t Fangio who shut that down and corrected him. Rumors surrounding Adorre was a pure Rosie decision. Hopefully that one works out better.

Let’s embrace Rosie strength here of churning out a trade bidding war for Pickett. He’s been given such a great chess piece…your third string Pawn…others want to pay us as at least a Bishop…thinking he’s a franchise QB. Cash in time!!!! Rosie fleece them!!

11 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Maybe we could get that after franchise tagging him three seasons. Huge mountain of what ifs between here and there. His trade value is high right now. Most anything he does after these next two PS games to increase his value higher….then I definitely don’t want to trade him.

Let’s also remember how I’ve been telling you McKee was the clear best number two option before last season. While you argued Rosie could do no wrong and trading for Pickett locking in over McKee as the backup was the right move.

So from the end of last season to right now…you’ve done a complete 180 flip as far as you possibly could. You didn’t think he was the number two…all the way to he’s a lock anytime on the future at such a high trade value.

Who would tag a BU QB????

2 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

WTF are you talking about???

Yeah not sure how long it will take for you to catch up…you can do it. Eventually you’ll get there. Regardless…it’s happening…we’ll just have to see how it works out.