So Dart out for the season would we be willing to trade McKee or Dalton to our division rivals if they came calling?

20 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

And again I don’t think we will have interest but MHJ name is being mentioned already as a trade candidate this season and obviously with Howie we are always attached to any player being traded it seems

We have too many WR's as it is. Hollywood wants out so he can play. Wicks seems to be hungry. Paying MHJ would cost alot and possibly prevent us from getting players we need(like O line and S)

I picked up Tank in fantasy leagues where I could as not sure Bark is going to play or not. I said before I was not a Shipley fan, but he seems to be coming along (finally). In this new offense Gainwell would do great(but he's a BUM 🤣 and is gone so whatever)

34 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

This to me would be the biggest mistake the team could make. Biggest thing for the OL is continuity. Shuffling the OL will only hurt us in the long run.

I’d be shocked if we shuffled the OL again this week little to no value in it. If Kendall struggles the I could see us trying Lampkin or signing a veteran off the street like Becton.

The value is if they haven’t come to a decision about what configuration of what players is best. Is Jurgens at Center and Kendall at Guard better than Kendall at Center and Jurgens at Guard. What about Lampkin at Center?

There are still unanswered questions

6 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

We have too many WR's as it is. Hollywood wants out so he can play. Wicks seems to be hungry. Paying MHJ would cost alot and possibly prevent us from getting players we need(like O line and S)

It wouldn’t cost us a lot if he was signed as a Free Agent.

31 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

For what lol it’s either we think he could help the team now make a trade while he is at his cheapest or have no interest in him. MHJ not even a FA until 2028(or 2029 if AZ picks up his option).

He is a FA if the Cardinals cut him.

7 minutes ago, mattwill said:

He is a FA if the Cardinals cut him.

The cardinals aren’t going to cut him lol a team

Will definitely trade for MHJ.

As for cost he had just under 900 yards 8’tds as a rookie then what 600-700 yards last year in 12 games are one of the worst teams in the NFL.

Jalen Nailor who has never had over 500 yards signed for 3 year 35m as a free agent. We gave Wicks 12.5m

16 minutes ago, mattwill said:

The value is if they haven’t come to a decision about what configuration of what players is best. Is Jurgens at Center and Kendall at Guard better than Kendall at Center and Jurgens at Guard. What about Lampkin at Center?

There are still unanswered questions

We had an entire offseason to see these guys play. You know how guys play better playing in the same position not being shuffled around.

Again biggest mistake the team can make is constantly shuffling the OL. We decided to go with Jurguens at LG and Kendall at C. Let that continue if Kendall starts to struggle then you look to make changes

Just now, Bleedinggreen93 said:

We had an entire offseason to see these guys play. You know how guys play better playing in the same position not being shuffled around.

Again biggest mistake the team can make is constantly shuffling the OL. We decided to go with Jurguens at LG and Kendall at C. Let that continue if Kendall starts to struggle then you look to make changes

The way Offseason is handled in today’s NFL there are zero live snaps against an opposing D-Line. Plus, in this offseason did Kendall and Jurgens see any snaps of any kind as a tandem?

Lampkin and Kendall did.

1 minute ago, mattwill said:

The way Offseason is handled in today’s NFL there are zero live snaps against an opposing D-Line. Plus, in this offseason did Kendall and Jurgens see any snaps of any kind as a tandem?

Lampkin and Kendall did.

Were you at every practice only a handful were open to the public so unless you can support that claim it’s a moot point

5 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Were you at every practice only a handful were open to the public so unless you can support that claim it’s a moot point

You may be right.

You had Jurguens playing a new position and Kendall starting his first game was it perfect nope. But shuffling them again isn’t going to help the settle in either.

Let it play out couple weeks again if Kendall struggles( because I believe Jurguens will be fine after getting used to playing LG) then we can look to adjust.

31 minutes ago, mattwill said:

He is a FA if the Cardinals cut him.

Actually, he would be subject to waivers. He does not have 4 accrued seasons in the league.

I'm not convinced that moving an all-pro center to guard because the backup guard is "more comfortable" at center is a good idea.

Just now, Bleedinggreen93 said:

You had Jurguens playing a new position and Kendall starting his first game was it perfect nope. But shuffling them again isn’t going to help the settle in either.

Let it play out couple weeks again if Kendall struggles( because I believe Jurguens will be fine after getting used to playing LG) then we can look to adjust.

I think Kendall at Center will be fine, but am not sure about Jurgens at Left Guard.

A to Z sports(in Philly I believe) wants Becton back. I do also. I mean how much worse could he be right now? He asked Howie to call him. He would work hard. He wants to be HERE

1 hour ago, mattwill said:

It wouldn’t cost us a lot if he was signed as a Free Agent.

It would be a shock to me if he settles for low pay. He was a terrific WR, but had idiots like Murray throwing to him(or not throwing lol)

1 hour ago, mattwill said:

The way Offseason is handled in today’s NFL there are zero live snaps against an opposing D-Line. Plus, in this offseason did Kendall and Jurgens see any snaps of any kind as a tandem?

Lampkin and Kendall did.

Thing about Lampkin. Yeah he looked good early but he is small for a lineman and not sure he could take a whole games punishment due to his limited size. IDK but the staff would. I'm with most on here that moving Jurgens wasn't a great move. Even a guy like Micah Morris may work. I think we should leave Jurgens at C and just keep trying everyone at LG. Also call plays for Hurts where he "rolls right" to avoid the rush from the left side. I don't have the answer, only suggestions

Lampkin is 290, Micah is 334, more suitable for a G. Micah has been elevated so we shall see

3 hours ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

This to me would be the biggest mistake the team could make. Biggest thing for the OL is continuity. Shuffling the OL will only hurt us in the long run.

I’d be shocked if we shuffled the OL again this week little to no value in it. If Kendall struggles the I could see us trying Lampkin or signing a veteran off the street like Becton.

Agree,

You would assume that the chemistry and play should only improve from TWO players playing their first NFL game at positions ... then going into the second game for each. Not sure why they would switch now without the reason being one of them getting replaced. To switch them around just to switch??? I don't see it? To me it would have to be Cam back to center and someone other than Kendall going in to play LG

2 hours ago, mattwill said:

The value is if they haven’t come to a decision about what configuration of what players is best. Is Jurgens at Center and Kendall at Guard better than Kendall at Center and Jurgens at Guard. What about Lampkin at Center?

There are still unanswered questions

So you think they change THIS week? Really? You don't think they are just going to let the chemistry improve from last week? You think seeing two guys play their first games at those positions is enough to say, lets try something else??? You don't think they prefer to let it play out a little more over time? Like at minimum a second week?

2 hours ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

We had an entire offseason to see these guys play. You know how guys play better playing in the same position not being shuffled around.

Again biggest mistake the team can make is constantly shuffling the OL. We decided to go with Jurguens at LG and Kendall at C. Let that continue if Kendall starts to struggle then you look to make changes

They shuffle in camp... not during the season. They obviously made the decision to go with this lineup for now. Again, the only change I see is putting in a new player, otherwise these 5 stay where they are.

1 hour ago, mattwill said:

I think Kendall at Center will be fine, but am not sure about Jurgens at Left Guard.

Wait... so you think they are going to sit Jurgens?

I think it should be obvious, Jurgens is playing... the question was who goes in to play after Dickerson. They chose Kendall. So while Kendall is in, they decided to play the 5 guys at those spots. In order to change, it would have to be Kendell out and another C going in... or move Jurgens back to C and find another guard.

You think we are going to see Jurgens sit, just to see Lampkin and Kendell play with each other?

I'm not sure what you are trying to convey here Matt? The idea that they aren't sold on anything, absolutely makes sense, but the idea that they are going to keep changing during actual games doesn't. Another player will go in, if Kendell doesn't perform like they want. Or if there is another injury.

The way you seem to be saying ( and maybe it's me not comprehending)??? is that you think ... this week lets change to Lampkin and Kendell... next week Lampkin and Jurgens, the following weeks we just shuffle them around from Center to Guard???? You really think they do that kind of stuff ...NOW? You don't think they are going off of what they saw all camp and what they currently believe to be the best lineup?

One change I could see.... Switching Steen to the other side and Jurgens at RG. Steen played enough at LG and Jurgens at RG... If they keep the same 5, that change wouldn't shock me, but I still doubt they do it.

10 minutes ago, joemas72 said:

One change I could see.... Switching Steen to the other side and Jurgens at RG. Steen played enough at LG and Jurgens at RG... If they keep the same 5, that change wouldn't shock me, but I still doubt they do it.

Seems sensible.