9 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Both I’d say would be the best S on our roster.

So that's the issue... you would say that.  So safe to assume those guys would want to start.  We have our starters at S.  After Byard disaster.... I don't think we bring in any back up that would have that idea of being a starter.   For the player nor the fans like you.

2 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

You don't think he would prefer to go a place where he would start?

Of course he’d prefer that. But he’s had a rough go of things the last two seasons that probably won’t afford him that opportunity. Not unless he wishes to hold out until during the season. 

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

A third S gets plenty of time on the field anyway. But yeah would be nice if we could upgrade and make Blankenship our third S. I see Adams as a very nice complimentary S to CGJ and Milk Check.

I still don't know what the plans are for DeJean. I know he wants to play,but where?

39 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Being a better option than Quez is hardly saying anything much positive. These are some terrible stats Roob dug up on Campbell. If he remains our clear cut third option….not looking promising. Shouldn’t have to explain how it will hold back being an elite O if we have such an obvious weak link out on the field consistently. Very limiting in the case of either of the top two WR not being able to suit up.

Better fit....absolutely a positive. 

2 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Better fit....absolutely a positive. 

Ainias can play out also,it's not his prime spot,but he can still do it and we have a few other guys that we don't hear about. Maybe they are fine as BU's but we never hear anything

4 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

I don't care he DIGRESSED and now we want to see him PROgress

Of course you don’t care. We have an actual QB coach this season plus an actual O scheme…would seem to obviously be of assistance to our QB. But if you thought he took a step back from being the top QB from 2022 in 2023…I can agree with that. This is all why I just want the best O mind we can get for our O to thrive. Would you agree with the obvious statement of Steichen is better than Johnson was as an O minded coach?

5 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

So that's the issue... you would say that.  So safe to assume those guys would want to start.  We have our starters at S.  After Byard disaster.... I don't think we bring in any back up that would have that idea of being a starter.   For the player nor the fans like you.

Simmons has every reason to expect to start. Adams isn’t on that high footing currently in his career after these past two seasons.

https://www.ourlads.com/nfldepthcharts/depthchart/PHI  Ross,and Johnny are depth players

5 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

I still don't know what the plans are for DeJean. I know he wants to play,but where?

Just using some common sense to make an educated guess. Maddox has proven to really struggle with durability and is only a short term one year signing. I believe DeJean is on the fast track to being the starting Slot CB.

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Of course you don’t care. We have an actual QB coach this season plus an actual O scheme…would seem to obviously be of assistance to our QB. But if you thought he took a step back from being the top QB from 2022 in 2023…I can agree with that. This is all why I just want the best O mind we can get for our O to thrive. Would you agree with the obvious statement of Steichen is better than Johnson was as an O minded coach?

Yes I would agree,but he is not here,the QB is the general ON THE FIELD and he was part of the collapse and the bonehead mistakes need to STOP. no more SB drops,no more JV EZ sacks,would you agree??

9 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Well if the player is better for us, then Blank would have to be the BU

Blankenship and CGJ are the starters.  

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

https://www.ourlads.com/nfldepthcharts/depthchart/PHI  Ross,and Johnny are depth players

Ross is one step away from getting a job at a car lot. Johnny? Hurts is trying hard to develop to become what this team really needs.

1 minute ago, joemas6 said:

Blankenship and CGJ are the starters.  

And what if those 2 are better than Blank,just ignore that?

8 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Better fit....absolutely a positive. 

Not sure if such a pathetically low yards per target WR is a better fit for anybody…anywhere.

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

Ross is one step away from getting a job at a car lot. Johnny? Hurts is trying hard to develop to become what this team really needs.

Hurts is not developing anyone we have coaches for that. Playing pitch and catch is not "developing" someone,stop with the Hurts is a god BS

3 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Yes I would agree,but he is not here,the QB is the general ON THE FIELD and he was part of the collapse and the bonehead mistakes need to STOP. no more SB drops,no more JV EZ sacks,would you agree??

No I don’t agree on that. How many fumbles does Mahomes have in SB games? I do believe cutting down on the turnovers is key to Hurts having a very successful season. The sack I don’t know much of what he really could have done about. He was straight running for his life. What could he have really done to avoid the sack? Hopefully we can block somebody so he isn’t immediately dealing with so many rushers unmolested so far back.

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

No I don’t agree on that. How many fumbles does Mahomes have in SB games? I do believe cutting down on the turnovers is key to Hurts having a very successful season. The sack I don’t know much of what he really could have done about. He was straight running for his life. What could he have really done to avoid the sack? Hopefully we can block somebody so he isn’t immediately dealing with so many rushers unmolested so far back.

So you don't agree Hurts dropped a ball??? And you don't agree Hurts took a JV EZ sack at TB? really?

Turnovers will kill any team. JV turnovers hurt the worst because they are JV errors in a PRO game

BTW I think Johnny will "develop" with or without Hurts as most rookies do.it's why we pay coaches and staff

3 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Hurts is not developing anyone we have coaches for that. Playing pitch and catch is not "developing" someone,stop with the Hurts is a god BS

You can clearly see Hurts explaining and coaching the young guys in the photo. Obviously really hoping the coaches can develop these WR. Hasn’t worked out that way so far unfortunately. It isn’t about Hurts being a god. It’s just very obvious he identifies the needs for this team. He clearly is being very proactive in working on improving the team. 

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

You can clearly see Hurts explaining and coaching the young guys in the photo. Obviously really hoping the coaches can develop these WR. Hasn’t worked out that way so far unfortunately. It isn’t about Hurts being a god. It’s just very obvious he identifies the needs for this team. He clearly is being very proactive in working on improving the team. 

You mean like all QB's do with new rookies? Like that?

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So you don't agree Hurts dropped a ball??? And you don't agree Hurts took a JV EZ sack at TB? really?

What was Hurts supposed to do to avoid that sack? I did agree Hurts fumbled. Just pointed out how many times Mahomes has also fumbled in the SB. 

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

coaches can develop these WR

Right,Hurts is just the guy throwing the ball

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

BTW I think Johnny will "develop" with or without Hurts as most rookies do.it's why we pay coaches and staff

Oh…so now coaches actually have a role and matter now to you?

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

What was Hurts supposed to do to avoid that sack? I did agree Hurts fumbled. Just pointed out how many times Mahomes has also fumbled in the SB. 

I don't care what Mahomes did or didn't do,I am an Eagles fan