1 minute ago, ManuManu said:

BTW, Daniels had 209 yards of offense in that game — 70 came in garbage time on their final drive against a soft defense defending a 16 point lead. This is laughable. 

What’s laughable is how dismissive you and many others are about that team.

Did we handle him today?

But again, I’m sure we’ll just handle them in the playoffs.

 

We turned that team over 5 times and the QB still had his way with our defense and threw 5 TD’s.

But don’t let that reality stop your cope.

1 minute ago, Parrot Head said:

What’s laughable is how dismissive you and many others are about that team.

Did we handle him today?

But again, I’m sure we’ll just handle them in the playoffs.

We handled him in game 1, but not today. Both can be true!

Just now, RLC said:

We handled him in game 1, but not today. Both can be true!

No, we didn’t. We held on and got a close win.

Elam for the Bills is trash

1 minute ago, Parrot Head said:

No, we didn’t. We held on and got a close win.

"held on".

4 minutes ago, judunno said:

Totally different team when Hurts isn't around. You'd think people would appreciate him after this but probably not. There's a reason why this offense closes out teams in the second half and how complementary the offense is to the defense to allow them to play fast all game.

I actually think that red zone trip where they ran it to the short side three consecutive plays is a massive spot where you missed hurts. Defenses have to account for his ability to run and it opens lanes for Barkley and even defenses have to play the pass differently in that situation.

Frankly, I hated all three of those plays by Moore. I hate running plays to the short side of the field in the red zone. And condensing an already small area. Tbh I’m surprised they didn’t try a similar play that they scored with aj on in the first quarter. Hard to stop Aj on a 5 yard slant 

1 minute ago, Parrot Head said:

No, we didn’t. We held on and got a close win.

No, we didn't. Game was dominated and they scored a late bs TD

 

Just now, DaEagles4Life said:

No, we didn't. Game was dominated and they scored a late bs TD

 

None of you were saying this when they were about to attempt the onside kick.

Just now, Parrot Head said:

None of you were saying this when they were about to attempt the onside kick.

The game was dominated, and sorry it didn't fit your narrative. 

Held on? The Eagles had a two score lead with like a minute left and they played prevent defense in the final minute and allowed a garbage touchdown that was pure miracle catch by Ertz on top of it.

 

and Daniels wasn’t even good today they spotted them a TD with a blown coverage and another in a Pickett INT. The final drive was the real one where the defense was just awful from play to play. And the 4th and 11 run which was inexcusable.

Just now, DaEagles4Life said:

The game was dominated, and sorry it didn't fit your narrative. 

And I was in here where everyone was breathing a huge sigh of relief when we recovered the kick. 

Somehow it wasn’t over until we got it.

10 minutes ago, RLC said:

Nigel Bradham and Derek Barnett absolutely played on the edge. 

Agreed... but very very rarely crossed it.   Barnett as a rookie seemed to be smarter than Barnett the vet.

6 minutes ago, Parrot Head said:

We turned that team over 5 times and the QB still had his way with our defense and threw 5 TD’s.

But don’t let that reality stop your cope.

Correct.  Embarrassing stuff by the defense 

2 minutes ago, Parrot Head said:

None of you were saying this when they were about to attempt the onside kick.

If a team with 1 minute left needs a TD, needs a 2pt conversion, needs an onside kick, needs another TD, needs another 2pt conversion…

 

then You were whipping that ass 

17 minutes ago, Iggles_Phan said:

Point is...

 

 

The Eagles are what they are what their record says they are.  

Yes but I'm not sure why you felt the need to add your point just to counter mine...

9 minutes ago, judunno said:

Probably the same reason none of our guys got flagged last week after throwing haymakers on the Slay fight.

Apples and oranges, as I see it.   One was a physical altercation, so the Eagles responded in kind.  (and got extra fines than the instigators)...

Meanwhile, CJGJ said mean words, and got punched in the face.  If the words are flagable, the punch has to be.  

No bigger queer than Tony Romo

3 minutes ago, Iggles_Phan said:

Agreed... but very very rarely crossed it.   Barnett as a rookie seemed to be smarter than Barnett the vet.

CJ needs to be smarter. But this unit is at their best when we're playing with fire. 

He's gotta find that sweet spot. 

So the loss pretty much locks the Eagles as the #2 seed and there is a decent chance we get the Commanders in Rd 1. It is pretty hard to beat a divisional opponent 2 times let alone 3. I don't have much issue with the loss...it gives them a chance to reflect and re-evaluate. 

What a shame, the 49ers lost again. 

1 minute ago, aptosbird said:

So the loss pretty much locks the Eagles as the #2 seed and there is a decent chance we get the Commanders in Rd 1. It is pretty hard to beat a divisional opponent 2 times let alone 3. I don't have much issue with the loss...it gives them a chance to reflect and re-evaluate. 

Frankly I’d guess eagles will have an extra chip on their shoulder for that playoff matchup after this loss to them. 

1 minute ago, Mike030270 said:

Yes but I'm not sure why you felt the need to add your point just to counter mine...

Because the what ifs don't matter.   They are a handful of other plays from a worse record.   Against the Jags, they were a better placed ball from losing that game on a late TD, instead its poorly thrown and Dean makes the play.   Its pointless to say they are two plays from 14-1, because they are a play here and there from being more like 8-7.  The Eagles won 6 games that were decided by one score.   If they all had one play flip, they lose them all.  So, the Eagles win the 2 here, but lose the other 6.  Point is, they made the plays they made, and didn't the ones they didn't.  And their record is what it is... and they are what they are.   And what they are is in control of landing the 2 seed... That's all that matters.

2 minutes ago, aptosbird said:

So the loss pretty much locks the Eagles as the #2 seed and there is a decent chance we get the Commanders in Rd 1. It is pretty hard to beat a divisional opponent 2 times let alone 3. I don't have much issue with the loss...it gives them a chance to reflect and re-evaluate. 

Well, they would have the same difficulty in beating the Eagles twice... especially winning twice at the Linc.    So, the odds are tipped in the Eagles' favor.