Hopefully the OC is working on plays breaking down

I think people see 2017 Wentz through green tinted lenses. He had a great season, but everything seemed to go right that year, even injuries didn't stop them. Everything just clicked, as if it was somehow meant to be.

17 minutes ago, Mortimer said:

I think people see 2017 Wentz through green tinted lenses. He had a great season, but everything seemed to go right that year, even injuries didn't stop them. Everything just clicked, as if it was somehow meant to be.

That doesn't change how he played

6 hours ago, Freshmilk said:

Give what a rest? Reminders of our collective infallibility? We are the smartest and most knowledgeable.

Maybe you are. I have no such illusions.

3 hours ago, Mike030270 said:

Wentz with prime Brown and Smith would have been awesome to see

Seeing how Alshon had major issues with Wentz you know that AJ would too.

5 hours ago, NCiggles said:

She has been far more villianized than he has been. Sure, it's distasteful to try to get out of a ticket but I don't think it's unusual or that she went about it in a mean spirited way. It's not like she went down the road of do you know who I am.

Maybe not mean spirited but entitled for certain. Sex or gender doesn't play a role there IMO. "Do you know who I am?". Is it fair that she is suffering far more for their indiscretion? No I don't think it is.

43 minutes ago, eglz1 said:

Maybe you are. I have no such illusions.

Understood. You are literal. I can be sarcastic.

1 hour ago, eglz1 said:

Maybe not mean spirited but entitled for certain. Sex or gender doesn't play a role there IMO. "Do you know who I am?". Is it fair that she is suffering far more for their indiscretion? No I don't think it is.

She has a big ego but I think that is part of the job.

Wentz was one of my favorite Eagles quarterbacks. Was really hoping he could lead us to multiple Super bowls. But he didn't and he didn't play that well for other teams soooooo I'm happy at where we are right now. We'll see how Hurts does this year but he certainly didn't seem fast enough to get away from anyone last year and he seemed unsure of himself. But again glad to have our 2nd Super Bowl!

7 hours ago, just relax said:

You frequently rant about Hurts holding the ball. Well, Wentz held the ball too. Full grasp of all the nuances of the position, my patootie!

And with only one hand, no less

7 hours ago, HazletonEagle said:

I could respond with a perfectly reasonable post explaining that but then this becomes me bashing Hurts or a Hurts vs Wentz debate. Not what that Wentz post was about.

That's 100% what your Wentz post was intended to be about.

54 minutes ago, RememberTheKoy said:

That's 100% what your Wentz post was intended to be about.

troll...

8 hours ago, just relax said:

You frequently rant about Hurts holding the ball. Well, Wentz held the ball too. Full grasp of all the nuances of the position, my patootie!

I think Wentz was a worse offender than Hurts. Both pretty long on that front.

It really is a shame the memories Wentz left. Recency bias. So many dont remember how good he was. Which was the point of my post.

22 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:

troll...

You're pulling the same crap that AJ did. You know exactly what you are doing as you are purposely doing it and then you're act like this oblivious victim when you get exactly the result you intended.

For a post that wasn't meant in any sort of subtle way to compare 2017 Wentz in anyway to Hurts, you brought up and mentioned Hurts twice in your Wentz post. In fact you closed it out with two paragraphs entirely centered around a Hurts vs Wentz debate.

18 minutes ago, RememberTheKoy said:

You're pulling the same crap that AJ did. You know exactly what you are doing as you are purposely doing it and then you're act like this oblivious victim when you get exactly the result you intended.

For a post that wasn't meant in any sort of subtle way to compare 2017 Wentz in anyway to Hurts, you brought up and mentioned Hurts twice in your Wentz post. In fact you closed it out with two paragraphs entirely centered around a Hurts vs Wentz debate.

Nope. You're just not very intelligent so you misunderstood. I was actually impressed with your response yesterday. But for some reason today you decided you wanted to argue about Hurts. (trolling).

48 minutes ago, eagle45 said:

I think Wentz was a worse offender than Hurts. Both pretty long on that front.

He was horrible about it also, but after holding the ball forever he made plays. It doesn't feel like that with hurts, when he holds the ball too long he panics. Wentz took a lot of sacks because of it

6 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:

Nope. You're just not very intelligent so you misunderstood. I was actually impressed with your response yesterday. But for some reason today you decided you wanted to argue about Hurts. (trolling).

I'm have not been arguing about Hurts with you at all today. Unless that new account that is obviously someone who has posted here before is just an alt of yours.

Today, I just responded to post you made in reply to someone else where you were saying your Wentz post wasn't about a Hurts vs Wentz debate, when it was. It was mostly about Wentz and that is what my reply to you yesterday was about. I was sure to hold off and do a separate reply to the two paragraph conclusion of your post which was entirely a Hurts vs Wentz debate you decided to conclude your post with.

Your post could have easily focused entirely on your points on Wentz in 2017 and how truly special he was, and it did for almost the entire post, but it was you who then intentionally concluded with two paragraphs doing a Hurts vs Wentz argument in a post that was entirely about 2017 Wentz up until that point.

4 minutes ago, RememberTheKoy said:

I'm have not been arguing about Hurts with you at all today. Unless that new account that is obviously someone who has posted here before is just an alt of yours.

Today, I just responded to post you made in reply to someone else where you were saying your Wentz post wasn't about a Hurts vs Wentz debate, when it was. It was mostly about Wentz and that is what my reply to you yesterday was about. I was sure to hold off and do a separate reply to the two paragraph conclusion of your post which was entirely a Hurts vs Wentz debate you decided to conclude your post with.

Your post could have easily focused entirely on your points on Wentz in 2017 and how truly special he was, and it did for almost the entire post, but it was you who then intentionally concluded with two paragraphs doing a Hurts vs Wentz argument in a post that was entirely about 2017 Wentz up until that point.

wrong...

18 minutes ago, devpool said:

He was horrible about it also, but after holding the ball forever he made plays. It doesn't feel like that with hurts, when he holds the ball too long he panics. Wentz took a lot of sacks because of it

If Hurts panics when he holds the ball too long then he would be a turnover machine, which he is not.  The only argument you can make for Wentz as better when he extends a play is looking at only 2017 for his career and ignoring the rest when he was objectively far worse than Jalen Hurts when trying to extend a play.  That became a primary part of his downfall and destruction of his career in his this league was that very issue for Wentz.

But if you do that then you can do the same for Jalen Hurts and at his best season in his career and how effectively he was when he extended plays in just that singular season focus.  

1 minute ago, HazletonEagle said:

wrong...

3 minutes ago, RememberTheKoy said:

One sentence about Hurts to illustrate how amazing Wentz was. And the statement that "this is actually not to knock hurts". Then back to Wentz.

Yep... youre wasting everyone's time again.

By the way, I have continued to not partake in any of the Hurts talk because again, that was not what that Wentz post was supposed to be about. I avoided it in response to JR, and I also avoided it with you.

Now you're not even arguing about Hurts. You are arguing that I wanted to argue about Hurts when I clearly havent done that. Move on.