1 minute ago, Toastrel said:

 

Fox News host calls out GOP for attacking the FBI after raid on Trump's home: 'Whatever happened to the Republican party backing the blue?'

Oh man that guy's getting cancelled.

1 minute ago, mikemack8 said:

Holy ish I googled lock him up gifs and found this  

Why does it look like he's crip walking?

4 minutes ago, mikemack8 said:

Holy ish I googled lock him up gifs and found this  

He wasn’t even that slim 15 years ago 

4 minutes ago, mikemack8 said:

Holy ish I googled lock him up gifs and found this  

i cant. 

I just noticed they kept with the tiny hands too lol

9 minutes ago, mikemack8 said:

Holy ish I googled lock him up gifs and found this  

Careful.  Know your audience.

 

 

 

Just now, paco said:

Careful.  Know your audience.

 

 

 

1 minute ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

🤣  Why did this thread need to be "reinstated"?

Procus deleted it cause his feelings were hurt

 

1 minute ago, TorontoEagle said:

Procus deleted it cause his feelings were hurt

What kind of coward deletes a thread?

41 minutes ago, downundermike said:

How lame to you have to be to have the mods reinstate a thread you deleted because your little feelers got hurt.

One thing I like about the new message boards is that you don't feel like big brother is watching every little thing you do the way when PE.com was monitoring.  You felt like you were in school again or something and the principal's office was watching.  After the new boards were set up, I asked Mod 12 if he could reinstate my warning points from the old boards as a badge of honor when we migrated to the new EMB, and he was good enough to honor my request.  Solid move if you ask me.

Just now, Procus said:

One thing I like about the new message boards is that you don't feel like big brother is watching every little thing you do the way when PE.com was monitoring.  You felt like you were in school again or something and the principal's office was watching.  After the new boards were set up, I asked Mod 12 if he could reinstate my warning points from the old boards as a badge of honor when we migrated to the new EMB, and he was good enough to honor my request.  Solid move if you ask me.

 

3 minutes ago, Boogyman said:

What kind of coward deletes a thread?

Which one is the Russian bot , procus or kz? Or both?

https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-doesnt-deny-taking-classified-nuclear-documents-mar-a-lago-2022-8

"Trump doesn't deny taking classified nuclear documents from the White House while baselessly accusing Obama of the same thing"

 

Dude said "whatabout Obama" lol.

4 minutes ago, jsdarkstar said:

So, Trump is now challenging the release of the search warrant in Court. Trump has a copy if and the inventory he can release himself. But as predicted, he will continue to fund raise off it and stir up hysteria hoping more FBI agents are attacked including the Attorney General, the FBI Director and Judge.

The Cult has declared war on the Dept. of Justice and the Rule of Law. 

Where are you seeing that? The fact that several media outlets have gotten their hands on it seem to imply it's already been unsealed, no?

Just now, we_gotta_believe said:

Where are you seeing that? The fact that several media outlets have gotten their hands on it seem to imply it's already been unsealed, no?

Nothing on court docket yet. Likely Trump leaked to Breitbart.

2 minutes ago, Boogyman said:

https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-doesnt-deny-taking-classified-nuclear-documents-mar-a-lago-2022-8

"Trump doesn't deny taking classified nuclear documents from the White House while baselessly accusing Obama of the same thing"

 

Dude said "whatabout Obama" lol.

My favorite part:

Quote

"The correct answer is: 'I didn't take any classified info,'" said the former official, who requested anonymity to candidly discuss the topic.

The person added: "'Word is...' Love that. Word from who? His barber?"

 

Just now, vikas83 said:

Nothing on court docket yet. Likely Trump leaked to Breitbart.

And then got passed along to others like CNN and MSNBC already? I mean, I know it's a hot scoop, but figured it would've stayed exclusive to Breitbart for a bit longer if it was a leak.

Quote

The documents obtained by Breitbart News include the warrant, two accompanying attachments specifying terms for the warrant, and a property receipt outlining the inventory federal agents seized from Mar-a-Lago.

UPDATE: 1:51 p.m. ET:

The inventory list of what was seized—or the receipt part of the document—is three pages long and constitutes two separate receipts, one that is two pages long and another that is one page long. Both receipts were signed by Trump’s attorney Christina Bobb and dated on Monday Aug. 8, 2022, at 6:19 p.m. The longer receipt was signed by FBI Special Agent Jeremy Linton and the shorter receipt was signed by the name: "L. Grady Gary” and includes the title SSA. It is unclear who that person is, and the handwriting is not the clearest.

UPDATE 2:01 p.m. ET:

The first receipt lists out 28 numbered items, including some that have sub-headers. Some of the items are actually named like item number 1 which says it was an "Executive Grant of Clemency re: Roger Jason Stone, Jr.” or 1A which says it is "Info re: President of France.”

Others like item number 2 are less specific. That item says it is a "Leatherbound box of documents.” Item 2A says it contained "Various Classified/TS/SCI documents.”

Item number 3 says it was a "potential presidential record,” and items numbers 5 and 6 both say they were a "binder of photos.”

Item number 7 says it was a "handwritten note,” and items 8, 9, and 10 were boxes labeled A-1, A-12, and A-15 respectively. Item 10A specifies that that item allegedly contained "Miscellaneous Secret Documents.”

The rest of the receipt document is similar and unspecific—explaining that several boxes, some allegedly containing various documents of various classifications—were among the rest of the items the FBI seized per this receipt.

UPDATE 2:04 p.m. ET:

The second receipt is much shorter, and less specific. The first item on that one just says "documents,” and the rest are just numbered boxes.

UPDATE 2:21 p.m. ET:

Another interesting fact from the warrant is that Judge Reinhart gave the Justice Department and FBI a lot of time to execute it. While the DOJ and FBI took their time–waiting three days to do it–technically the document says that Reinhart authorized the feds to wait even longer all the way until next Friday on Aug. 19 to execute it. While we still do not have the underlying affidavits that represent what the FBI and DOJ took to the judge to seek and gain his approval for the warrant, that seems to indicate that the judge did not think this is so serious that immediate or urgent action was needed to be taken as he gave the authorities two full weeks–or 14 full days–in which to execute the warrant.

UPDATE 2:25 p.m. ET:

Attachment B to the warrant delineates the three statutes which agents are pursuing evidence under. They are: 18 U.S.C. § § 793, 2071, and 1519.

UPDATE 2:34 p.m. ET:

Attachment A to the warrant delineates where the agents can search and where they cannot at Mar-a-Lago. Specifically, it says that agents could search the "45 Office,” and "all storage rooms, and all other rooms or areas within the premises used or available to be used by” the former President of the United States [the document uses the abbreviation FPOTUS] "and his staff and in which boxes or documents could be stored, including all structures or buildings on the estate.” This attachment does however said agents are not authorized to search areas "currently (i.e., at the time of the search) being occupied, rented, or used by third parties (such as Mar-a-Lago members) and not otherwise used or available to be used by FPOTUS and his staff, such as private guest suites.”

UPDATE 2:37 p.m. ET:

Further fleshing out Attachment B, which contains the most information about the goals and intent of the DOJ and FBI at this stage of any document short of the as-of-now-still-unavailable affidavit, what it does is list three criminal statutes under which items are to be searched and seized. They are: 18 U.S.C. section 793, which deals with defense information; 18 U.S.C. section 1519, which deals with destroying federal documents; and 18 U.S.C. section 2071, which deals with concealing, removing, or damaging federal documents. The first statute is the one that has likely provoked media speculation about so-called "nuclear” documents: it applies to a broad range of defense "information,” from code books to ordinary photographs.

UPDATE 2:43 p.m. ET:

All of this is technically irrelevant anyway because Trump–who as president has original and absolute declassification authority–said he declassified all of these documents. "Number one, it was all declassified,” Trump said on Truth Social moments ago. "Number two, they didn’t need to ‘seize’ anything. They could have had it anytime they wanted without playing politics and breaking into Mar-a-Lago. It was in secured storage, with an additional lock put on as per their request.”

 

1 minute ago, vikas83 said:

Nothing on court docket yet. Likely Trump leaked to Breitbart.

^^^ this.

So what we have now is what Trump's team wants us to see. It could be everything. But it might not.

7 minutes ago, jsdarkstar said:

So, Trump is now challenging the release of the search warrant in Court. Trump has a copy if and the inventory he can release himself. But as predicted, he will continue to fund raise off it and stir up hysteria hoping more FBI agents are attacked including the Attorney General, the FBI Director and Judge.

The Cult has declared war on the Dept. of Justice and the Rule of Law. 

You sure about that?  He's obviously the one who gave it to Brietbart.

Just now, we_gotta_believe said:

And then got passed along to others like CNN and MSNBC already? I mean, I know it's a hot scoop, but figured it would've stayed exclusive to Breitbart for a bit longer if it was a leak.

Brietbart and WSJ got them at the exact same time as per Maggie Haberman's reporting. So it sounds like an email blast from Trump.

3 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Where are you seeing that? The fact that several media outlets have gotten their hands on it seem to imply it's already been unsealed, no?

Deleted it. I misheard it. He is not opposing. 

 

 

2 minutes ago, VanHammersly said:

You sure about that?  He's obviously the one who gave it to Brietbart.

No., I was wrong. Misheard it. 

4 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

And then got passed along to others like CNN and MSNBC already? I mean, I know it's a hot scoop, but figured it would've stayed exclusive to Breitbart for a bit longer if it was a leak.

A release from the court would have redacted the names of the FBI agents

Plus, Breitbart doesn't have the affidavit because Trump didn't get that