5 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I have been incredibly precisely predicting how things will play out under my assumptions I’ll point out. How could I have known and thought that way?

Good fortune. Luck of the draw. All sorts of reasons.

There is a tried and true saying that "the definition of Luck is When Preparation meets Opportunity. You do take a lot of time to prepare yourself. That is a good thing. But most of the things that are considered in football involve forks in the road where you have to choose one fork or the other. That causes very different paths to be taken and different conclusions to be reached. For example when you are faced with the fork in the road where one way means a focus on Offense and the other way means a focus on Defense, you almost always take the Offense fork. More often than not I take the Defense fork. Even within Offense there is a fork where one way focuses on the skill positions and the other way focuses on the trenches. You almost always take the skill position fork and I almost always take the trenches fork. As a result we come to different conclusions.

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Why wouldn’t you feature our Oline run blocking?

That was the change Siri made after the bye????? You don't understand this????

5 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Week one equal to postseason games according to you

No. Never ever ever said that. You are practicing Revisionist History.

You established the original proposition, not me, and that proposition only covered regular season games. When you tried to weasel in the Playoffs games I immediately called you out for that.

So ….

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Occasionally I’m forced to use utensils like spoons to hide being such a Neanderthal primitive. I answer questions so continently regularly. Pretty much respond to most shared thoughts in general. But what’s your question? I’ll entertain your curiousity best I can. Fire away…unfairly accusing me of avoiding questions I feel. My point of view is you just don’t like my answers is actually the situation if anything.

Who is the "brilliant O mind" we should have hired when Moore left, out of the available candidates?

5 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

My opinion is we didn’t need to have ever done that though…to be clear. Felt we just unleash such a talented O …they’d put up points enough to be hard for most to accomplish competing against. Put up 50…suffer a mistake or two without thwarting things. Can’t argue against the approach did work…won games…grabbed the Lombardi. So can’t refer to that approach as wrong. Just believe unleashing believing in coaching going for greatness instead of don’t lose…wasn’t going to be stopped either. Top D supporting an O capable of lighting up the scoreboard real tough to beat.

You and I disagree on that, and the results of the first four games bear that out. You clearly are willing to take on high levels of risk. Levels that significantly increase the chances of turnovers.

22 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

https://www.statmuse.com/nfl/ask/nfl-qb-interceptions-2024 At the rate of 1 pick per game(and it was more by %) he would have been #1 in the NFL last year had we(Siri) not stopped it

Q2 for Ham. Do you agree or disagree with this statement and why?

5 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

My opinion is we didn’t need to have ever done that though…to be clear. Felt we just unleash such a talented O …they’d put up points enough to be hard for most to accomplish competing against. Put up 50…suffer a mistake or two without thwarting things. Can’t argue against the approach did work…won games…grabbed the Lombardi. So can’t refer to that approach as wrong. Just believe unleashing believing in coaching going for greatness instead of don’t lose…wasn’t going to be stopped either. Top D supporting an O capable of lighting up the scoreboard real tough to beat.

We were 2-2 before the bye??? That is your "unleashed" offense? It went spectacularly when we(Siri) put the leash back on

2 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

So back up how when Hurts was throwing the most interceptions in 2023 we weren’t the second highest scoring team past halfway point in the season. Sorry…I know it sounds good and all….but actually isn’t correct

Why are you choosing 2023 when 2024 is staring you in the face?

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

We were 2-2 before the bye??? That is your "unleashed" offense? It went spectacularly when we(Siri) put the leash back on

Continuing in that vein would have us with a .500 or so record? UNLEASHED!!!!! 🤣

2 minutes ago, mattwill said:

Why are you choosing 2023 when 2024 is staring you in the face?

2021, Brett Favre, Tom Brady, Hamloaf

2 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

5 whole interceptions is your defining number of our leader throwing all these interceptions. First time calling Oline blocking assignments, reading everything, calling for motion to begin. Yeah all these years he barely was given this so common place tool in every pro O scheme being run the last decade. Oh yeah…learning this brand new O created developing chemistry with every other O player gets ng on the same page. Not just him…but his targets this season were also reading and adjusting as well. You know…receiving just another common place pro O feature finally. Let’s just be straight about just how mastered and perfected a new O creation can ever possibly be before ever facing live real game testing. Seemed to me it needed to be tweaked and improved after bye week studying its quality.

But first Lane Johnson and the O-Line disagreed with you, then Stoutland agreed with them and disagreed with you, and then Moore too agreed with them and disagreed with you. How do you explain their individual and collective disagreement with you?

Just now, mattwill said:

But first Lane Johnson and the O-Line disagreed with you, then Stoutland agreed with them and disagreed with you, and then Moore too agreed with them and disagreed with you. How do you explain their individual and collective disagreement with you?

2 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I mean is that any possibility at all in your mind? Could the brand new O Moore created combining Siri and his concepts and terminology together actually have not been just spliced together just in one summer as well as let’s say an AR O scheme he inherited from a genius that Holmgrem inherited and did plenty of adapting to. Oh and the decades of AR master class 100s of games battle testing he has evolved his scheme to become? Several genius O minds spending decades one after the other actually testing and operating their O …maybe room for a slight understanding of Moore didn’t create a scheme in a few summer months equaling decades of brilliant master craft.

All very good points in the abstract, but what do those abstract thoughts have to do with reality? Andy was long gone … and for the most part forgotten. He was the present in KC, but ancient history in Philadelphia.

7 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

We were 2-2 before the bye??? That is your "unleashed" offense? It went spectacularly when we(Siri) put the leash back on

Once again,Hurts and I will also include the rest of the team were not acclimating to the Moore offense. When you are in a hole stop digging

2 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

What is a reasonable timeframe of grace period creating a Pro O scheme? One month…with some practices to test? One year of hard work by the greatest O mind in history? A decade?

I believe (opinion) that there is no grace period at all.

2 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

But let’s call it fair to blame everything on the QB expecting a pro scheme to be perfected in a couple of months never even testing in PS games with starters. Sure…let’s just define a player so heavily on his first series backed up in his own endzone first time without the red jersey ON….can I add it’s taking place in Brazil? Not even QB fault…Dickerson All Pro G got bulldozed into him is why an interception even happened. But 4 picks…meaning 25 percent of evaluating things you placing on all that occurring. That seems legitimate to condemn the QB labeling him flawed interception thrower.

I don’t blame it on the QB. I blame it on Moore. He was repeating the same thinks here in how he used Hurts as he had in prior years in how he used Dak. In both cases he set up his QB to fail.

JMO

2 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Brazil first game of the season feels like enough to completely blow off an interception. Stud G getting beat is actually the guy at fault so Hurts can’t finish his throw. First series…of that first game. No PS action at all. In his own endzone at that. Then maybe we get to how it took a super stud interception machine S coming all the way across making the pick. Kelce retiring adding several more responsibilities the QB first time executing. Brand new O he’s never used in a game.

All of which are Moore flaws.

2 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Guess I’m kind of listing out just how numerous the factors are so you can read it and consider just how unreasonable it would be forming a quarter of defining opinion based on that single moment. I’d call the least defining moment of the season in fact.

I don’t disagree with you. It was Moore’s job to account for those favors.

I strongly believe he will repeat his history for a third time in New Orleans.

2 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

But five interceptions…holy crap…bench that guy for Ryan Leaf. Take away every reason excusing any QB in that situation not being flawless already. He threw five picks the whole season. No fair reasonable objectionable opinion condemning just the QB on so very little. Especially don’t let facts of All Pro G actually being at fault for the first one instead of the QB. Make sure to never consider the fresh O never been tested very likely wasn’t flawless before it ever tested a game. Number one WR hurt first game. Oline injuries.

He wasn’t benched.

2 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I know I’m hopelessly reaching here that you’ll read all this and actually consider just how agenda based HurtsHating defining and condemning our QB is over four interceptions…blah blah…listing the twenty reasons there can’t be any reasonable expectation the O was already mastered by players before it was mastered designed by Moore.

Why is it Hurts Hating? Why isn’t it Moore Hating?

2 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Four interceptions…say it out loud…absolutely nothing….but yank that QB leader …what a bum…first starting QB ever thrown four picks in several games ever. We want our money back.

He was never yanked.

2 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Brett Favre averaged around 18 interceptions a season….guess he never scored points turning the ball over that many times. FL you’d completely make that QB only hand off ever. 4 you conclude defined Hurts…

Favre didn’t have either Saquon or an O-Line like the Eagles did. So the options to reduce risk were severely limited.

2 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I don’t know…guess it feels like the more I point out just how unreasonable it is…it actually could sink in. Which isn’t going to happen…to me every time typing it just so clearly sounding beyond outrageous expectations to ever have. It’s like in one TC every QB should reach Drew Brees levels of mastery he reached in his thirties executing a great Peyton scheme for many years.

You too are falling into the trap of placing the responsibility on Hurts’ shoulders. The responsibility for understanding and managing risk should fall on Moore’s shoulders.

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

What’s Mailata getting paid? Dickerson? Jurgens? Lane? All top paid players. What coach doesn’t feature their top paid players? Making it sound like relying on those guys to run block is only a break in case of emergency last resort. They should be the first option. Brees, Brady, Marino…what QB would it take that you choose to not let our Oline attack and maul guys?

Glad to see you agree with me.

The question I have is why didn’t Moore understand that right from the beginning of OTAs?

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Just don’t know…guess it makes me the obnoxious d1ck pointing out just how flawed these statements I’m hearing keep being shared. Because Hurts threw four picks we got forced into relying on the 6’8” 350 pounders to try to move players. Featuring the players at positions our GM prioritizes and pays the most.

The picks were the evidence that Moore wasn’t understanding or managing risk.