Nabors 1,204 yards receiving with 7 TDs as a rookie …from terrible passers. What levels of concern towards a division rival would be an overstatement about him? Is he our biggest individual threat in 2025? Foreseeable whole future? Is he flat out the best most unguardable WR in the league right now? All time? Specifically towards Eagles situation as divisional rival to face as a challenge two weeks a season…likely(depending on Giants actually improving) becoming a potential third matchup in the postseason.

Just sick sick nasty incredible player! Saying in contention or conversation at least ….of best most unstoppable WR. League today is stacked I’m referring to as all time historically best WR talent. Justin Jefferson, Puka Nacua, AJ, Ja’Marr Chase(my personal top choice ranking), Ceedee Lamb, DeVanta Adams, The Cheetah….i left deserving guys off the list even….everyone actually with opportunities and a case towards all time best WR. All together at once in the league. NFL has never shawcased higher talent levels individually or collectively.

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Is he flat out the best most unguardable WR in the league right now? All time?

🤣

Hard to even fabricate imagining a more difficult situation for a WR than 2024 giants. Terrible QBs play, without any other O options to be focussed towards…relying on a poor OLine to holdup long enough…oh..and he was just a rookie.

1,204 yards 7 TD….that was Nabors ‘career floor’ evidently. Holy crap!

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

But…going deeper…he’d bring the wisdom and knowledge gained by his NFL experience with several NFL D minds to jump start two rookies and a second year no experienced group. Quality just right there. Even doesn’t play a down. Which he’s really more than likely the easy starter player in reality. Kyzir strength is considered his pass coverage abilities. So even just have him pair up switching complimenting Trot by situational substitution.

This comment directly contradicts your earlier lengthy comment exhorting the Eagles to play younger players sooner.

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Kyzir White 137 tackles last season

9 tackles for a loss

an interception

Our starter Dean severe football athlete injury…may never start again.

Jihad injured rookie not expected to participate all TC.

Yeah…quality signing easily considered a starter. Tons of quality in signing him. Every which way around it…other than move Trot and Smael back to mostly backup reps and learning curve experience.

Here too you are contradicting your prior "play the young guys sooner” comment.

Just now, mattwill said:

Here too you are contradicting your prior "play the young guys sooner” comment.

Both sides must be covered LOL

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Oh Fangio has and does like his 5 Man front. Making a mistake if you only consider what Fangio deployed in that SB. It was dominated by one D…Cover 3. He didn’t hardly touch digging into his playbook. Rest of the season and his career he’s broke out tons more than needed in that Sb. Heck did he even blitz in that SB?

What Eagles games last season featured a five man D-Line?

1 hour ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

"Pass the bill so we can find out what's in it"? When the cuts happen we should know who gets cut 🤣 I'm going to guess though they are guys we don't need. Really sticking my neck out here

I see you as just continuing extensive bad opinions playing out. Just one injury we suffer all TC and PS could so easily create obvious need concurring with availability. Or just player becoming available over simple contract cap hit money team situation….could present near no brainer addition. Every team probably has a couple of vets fitting this financial business decision choice being made. Contract has a player at too large a cap hit to justify absorbing …also not wishing to chose the extension financial option as means to rectify. Heck Goedert for us this season. Easy situation just revolving around cap number with a quality player. Worked out nice….he just agreed to lower his cap hit and accept bonus incentives as compromise. Otherwise….starting TE could have been acquired by any other team.

1 hour ago, joemas6 said:

Breaking news is coming....not Huff

How would you interpret that?

It hasn't broken yet, when it breaks I told you so

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Fangio is known for few to still tap into the five man front. Just can only say you’re just wrong here. It in fact was even arguably the biggest personnel package talking point going into the Fangio addition last season. You could trust me…or if needed I can dog up tons of articles and such researching our DC Fangio for you. Really worth all efforts digging into Fangio for us Eagles fans. I’m seeing this DC staying right here at this job for years to come finishing out his career. As big a fixture to dive into as any piece of our organization here…short of Rosie and Lurie I won’t foolishly omit.

Dig up the articles. I look forward to reading them.

Given the personnel Fangio had last season, he barely had five D-Linemen … the four active DTs plus BG and Sweat.

3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I see you as just continuing extensive bad opinions playing out. Just one injury we suffer all TC and PS could so easily create obvious need concurring with availability. Or just player becoming available over simple contract cap hit money team situation….could present near no brainer addition. Every team probably has a couple of vets fitting this financial business decision choice being made. Contract has a player at too large a cap hit to justify absorbing …also not wishing to chose the extension financial option as means to rectify. Heck Goedert for us this season. Easy situation just revolving around cap number with a quality player. Worked out nice….he just agreed to lower his cap hit and accept bonus incentives as compromise. Otherwise….starting TE could have been acquired by any other team.

Which "bad opinion" are you referring to? and what does your response have to do with this post?

"Pass the bill so we can find out what's in it"? When the cuts happen we should know who gets cut 🤣 I'm going to guess though they are guys we don't need. Really sticking my neck out here

I see you as just continuing extensive bad opinions playing out. Just one injury we suffer all TC and PS could so easily create obvious need concurring with availability. Or just player becoming available over simple contract cap hit money team situation….could present near no brainer addition. Every team probably has a couple of vets fitting this financial business decision choice being made. Contract has a player at too large a cap hit to justify absorbing …also not wishing to chose the extension financial option as means to rectify. Heck Goedert for us this season. Easy situation just revolving around cap number with a quality player. Worked out nice….he just agreed to lower his cap hit and accept bonus incentives as compromise. Otherwise….starting TE could have been acquired by any other team.

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

I see you as just continuing extensive bad opinions playing out. Just one injury we suffer all TC and PS could so easily create obvious need concurring with availability. Or just player becoming available over simple contract cap hit money team situation….could present near no brainer addition. Every team probably has a couple of vets fitting this financial business decision choice being made. Contract has a player at too large a cap hit to justify absorbing …also not wishing to chose the extension financial option as means to rectify. Heck Goedert for us this season. Easy situation just revolving around cap number with a quality player. Worked out nice….he just agreed to lower his cap hit and accept bonus incentives as compromise. Otherwise….starting TE could have been acquired by any other team.

What does this response have to do with the post?????

1 hour ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

https://athlonsports.com/nfl/philadelphia-eagles/philadelphia-eagles-15-million-trade-savings-keys-trey-hendrickson-dream-move-bengals-bryce-huff Hendickson long term would fit Howie

I want Hendrickson for 2025, but not long term. Get him from Cincinnati for a 3rd that could be a 2nd if he is extended. Don’t extend him and gets 3rd Round Comp pick back when he walks in FA.

40 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Well we don't know because you never answered my question. A)You are high on Daniels or B) he won't last which is it?

40 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Well we don't know because you never answered my question. A)You are high on Daniels or B) he won't last which is it?

See why can’t I believe both are true? This just highlights our differences as much as anything. Everything doesn’t just fit perfectly outstanding or garbage. Already in just his rookie season I’d say he backed up plenty enough surrounding his elite playmaking abilities. Washington…Washington…he carried to the NFC Championship game as a rookie. You personally blew off my statement about Daniels was a real problem for the Eagles. At most …you considered it as a further away future problem at most. Kids sick! Fact proven backed up on display whole first season at levels already beyond proof enough about my evaluations of him. No four or five years wait for that grading.

Now…I do see his weakness being his frame and build and durability. He’s no Jalen Hurts built like a rock. So how many more seasons will he make it through? Weakest stretch we beat then during with his rib injury(I believe it was). Just how extensive will his career longevity provide? He relies on his slimmer uber gifted athleticism. So injuries or Pro abuse could really significantly alter him.

Just now, mattwill said:

I want Hendrickson for 2025, but not long term. Get him from Cincinnati for a 3rd that could be a 2nd if he is extended. Don’t extend him and gets 3rd Round Comp pick back when he walks in FA.

Well he is requesting a long term deal whoever takes him, so IDK what deal can be worked out

Unbelievable highest level of elite while also not looking very durable or lengthy career. Why can’t it be both? Phins drafted so very high and paid top money to Tua. He doesn’t even have the highs of potential ceiling as Daniels. His durability not just do I question more…has proven out to be nothing but questionable.

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

See why can’t I believe both are true? This just highlights our differences as much as anything. Everything doesn’t just fit perfectly outstanding or garbage. Already in just his rookie season I’d say he backed up plenty enough surrounding his elite playmaking abilities. Washington…Washington…he carried to the NFC Championship game as a rookie. You personally blew off my statement about Daniels was a real problem for the Eagles. At most …you considered it as a further away future problem at most. Kids sick! Fact proven backed up on display whole first season at levels already beyond proof enough about my evaluations of him. No four or five years wait for that grading.

Now…I do see his weakness being his frame and build and durability. He’s no Jalen Hurts built like a rock. So how many more seasons will he make it through? Weakest stretch we beat then during with his rib injury(I believe it was). Just how extensive will his career longevity provide? He relies on his slimmer uber gifted athleticism. So injuries or Pro abuse could really significantly alter him.

OK so you are high on him until he can't play, got it. Both sides covered per usual

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

OK so you are high on him until he can't play, got it. Both sides covered per usual

Well how does my evaluation I arrived at during his college years seem to be flawed? He lit the league on fire first season. Just undeniably backed up my evaluation already there. Just seems like obviously logical take. Just look at him. He doesn’t look like any version of The Thing Fantastic Four. I’m very specifically breaking down a complete evaluation on a player. BS both side weak comment. All this just absolutely applies evaluating Jayden Daniels.

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Simmons I could conclude if signed would be our top S. Would enable depth S to be more sprinkled in…for varying looks and packages. Could consider him a potential Pro Bowl level acquisition, right? Who would be totally against that? But…also I’d make the statement and case…our S room is as strong as I can ever remember it being. Really been weak far too often instead.

Again this approach directly contradicts your prior "play the young players sooner” argument.

4 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

OK so you are high on him until he can't play, got it. Both sides covered per usual

Too simpleton logic and thinking for me. Everything very rarely if ever is just rainbows and butterflies or rotting roadkill. Reality is filled with so many more specific details.

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

Unbelievable highest level of elite while also not looking very durable or lengthy career. Why can’t it be both? Phins drafted so very high and paid top money to Tua. He doesn’t even have the highs of potential ceiling as Daniels. His durability not just do I question more…has proven out to be nothing but questionable.

SO he's great, but if he goes out this season you told us so. If he doesn't go out you were high on him and told us so

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Well how does my evaluation I arrived at during his college years seem to be flawed? He lit the league on fire first season. Just undeniably backed up my evaluation already there. Just seems like obviously logical take. Just look at him. He doesn’t look like any version of The Thing Fantastic Four. I’m very specifically breaking down a complete evaluation on a player. BS both side weak comment. All this just absolutely applies evaluating Jayden Daniels.

Just say you are high on him and leave it at that, or say he won't last and leave it at that. What is the time frame until he goes out?

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Huff being traded. That will be Breaking news. So another move…could result in other breaking news. Are you defining ‘breaking news’ as only the top most significant stories? Like only a Trey Hendricson colossal level of internet engulfing Eagles news means this?

Not breaking news … already broken news. Breaking news is in the present or the future. The already broken news about Huff is in the past.

Just now, mattwill said:

Again this approach directly contradicts your prior " play the young players sooner” argument.

I totally ackowledge that. What’s the right answer? At S I’m leaning against it because of the youth logic. Adding what could easily be our best S…I could see as appropriate reasons to bring in vet and bump back youth development as side effect. Simmons is capable of best in the league levels of S play here. Can’t just ignore developing young guys instead of just choosing to bring in the best.

12 minutes ago, mattwill said:

I want Hendrickson for 2025, but not long term. Get him from Cincinnati for a 3rd that could be a 2nd if he is extended. Don’t extend him and gets 3rd Round Comp pick back when he walks in FA.

Watt a possibility also I think still. My view being next two seasons making moves surrounding being ‘All In.’ Do these players absolutely fit that bill? Undeniably. So signed to three year contract mostly banking on the first two works for me.