April 22, 20241 yr Author 4 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: So you believe Guyton will be available at 53? Will DeJean? Bowers?
April 22, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said: Their defense was better ,maybe not better,but we had an awful scheme of laying off 10 yards on 3rd downs Their defense was owned by Arizona, US game 1, Buffalo, SF and Green Bay. The Dallas defense was for show...not for dough. They were not better than the Eagles last year.
April 22, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, joemas6 said: They were physical... that takes a toll on the way the season goes. LA was a joke last year... like a week off Chargers made a weak decision on whom they brought in as OC. That was a very huge decision for that franchise…having a D minded HC.
April 22, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, joemas6 said: Their defense was owned by Arizona, US game 1, Buffalo, SF and Green Bay. The Dallas defense was for show...not for dough. They were not better than the Eagles last year. Not like our D was so stingy versus the Cards. Don’t think we allowed them to get a first down the whole game.
April 22, 20241 yr Author 2 minutes ago, joemas6 said: Their defense was owned by Arizona, US game 1, Buffalo, SF and Green Bay. The Dallas defense was for show...not for dough. They were not better than the Eagles last year. Laying off 10 yards will make any defense look awful
April 22, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said: Chargers made a weak decision on whom they brought in as OC. That was a very huge decision for that franchise…having a D minded HC. I don't care about the Chargers... Other than knowing that Dallas had an easy non physical game ...which helps over the course of 17 games. A physical battle vs KC definitely has a negative effect on 17 weeks of ball.
April 22, 20241 yr 6 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: Their defense was better ,maybe not better,but we had an awful scheme of laying off 10 yards on 3rd downs Better D and better O
April 22, 20241 yr We had better ST than the cowboys however. Elliott is a stud. Made the decision to get a real P.
April 22, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said: Not like our D was so stingy versus the Cards. Don’t think we allowed them to get a first down the whole game. Correct... again... to me it's the same... Dallas was not better. That's you with an agenda....and when you said Pollard at 10.7 mil was a good all in move...that's when your agenda is obvious. Thar was an absolute brutal business decision that hurt them last year and going forward losing that cap space.
April 22, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said: Better D and better O Yeah...looked really good vs Buffalo
April 22, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said: We had better ST than the cowboys however. Elliott is a stud. Made the decision to get a real P. Dallas had the all pro kicker!!! Did you even watch last year?
April 22, 20241 yr 2 minutes ago, joemas6 said: I don't care about the Chargers... Other than knowing that Dallas had an easy non physical game ...which helps over the course of 17 games. A physical battle vs KC definitely has a negative effect on 17 weeks of ball. Every game was close and pushed out players to the limits physically. Patricia took over and limited the rotation even more. Our team looked whooped and worn out down the stretch completely.
April 22, 20241 yr Author 4 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: Better D and better O I thought we set franchise records on O??? That's what someone keeps telling me. If that is the case, you lose games it's because of your defense. So IDK what you define as "better".You have different schedules. I suppose you would know if you compared common opponents and had the identical players playing
April 22, 20241 yr 4 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: Laying off 10 yards will make any defense look awful You can tell someone on here doesn't read other posts. Tough for us to have a conversation with that.
April 22, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, joemas6 said: Correct... again... to me it's the same... Dallas was not better. That's you with an agenda....and when you said Pollard at 10.7 mil was a good all in move...that's when your agenda is obvious. Thar was an absolute brutal business decision that hurt them last year and going forward losing that cap space. I didn’t say 10.7 Pollard move was good. That’s you and your agenda. I said not signing him to top dollar long term contract was wise. Actually a pretty large divide in the two points.
April 22, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said: Every game was close and pushed out players to the limits physically. Patricia took over and limited the rotation even more. Our team looked whooped and worn out down the stretch completely. Correct... because we had by far the more difficult and physical schedule.
April 22, 20241 yr Just now, cunninghamtheman said: I didn’t say 10.7 Pollard move was good. That’s you and your agenda. I said not signing him to top dollar long term contract was wise. Actually a pretty large divide in the two points. So I have to go back to quote you now?
April 22, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said: I thought we set franchise records on O??? That's what someone keeps telling me. If that is the case, you lose games it's because of your defense. So IDK what you define as "better".You have different schedules. I suppose you would know if you compared common opponents and had the identical players playing They had the number one O league wide. We had Hurts break Franchise scoring records.
April 22, 20241 yr Author Just now, cunninghamtheman said: They had the number one O league wide. We had Hurts break Franchise scoring records. Yet we dropped 4 PPG average. Schedule must have been cake to pull that off
April 22, 20241 yr Just now, joemas6 said: So I have to go back to quote you now? Yep…because you are trying to spin my words. Getting rid of Zeke was crucial move they needed to make. Making the mistake of opening up the vault for Pollard long term would have been stupid.
April 22, 20241 yr Author 3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: They had the number one O league wide. We had Hurts break Franchise scoring records. Right,this is the ball hogging you can't seem to admit to. How many TD's from Hurts were tush pushes?
April 22, 20241 yr Author 1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said: Right,this is the ball hogging you can't seem to admit to. How many TD's from Hurts were tush pushes? Despite those"Franchise scoring" records, we still dropped from 29 PPG to 25
April 22, 20241 yr 5 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: Right,this is the ball hogging you can't seem to admit to. How many TD's from Hurts were tush pushes? I love that Hurts is historically all time great at converting short yardage. Completely a positive for me. Ball hog all day long putting the ball in the end zone as far I’m concerned. Scoring TDs is the name of the game. Hurts scored more than anybody ever for us. With a HC that has proven to not be good running the O and a first time OC we had to fire. That was something very special that happened last season.
April 22, 20241 yr On 4/19/2024 at 12:23 PM, cunninghamtheman said: Pollard was All In and they were vetting him. Wisely used that to figure out he wasn’t the guy. Saquans a much more all in move. Wisely spent $10.7 mil? On a guy that they didn't know was worth it? That's a brutal way to run a business. You never recover that money. The alternative was to sign a Montgomery type ...you take a 3 or 4 mil cap hit, and you can use the other 7-8 mil for other stuff...or keep the cap space. Your logic of " vetting" a guy you already had for 4 years by committing huge cap hit...is plain bad business.
Create an account or sign in to comment