May 30, 20242 yr Author 2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: It’s not 40 that you said most of the time In pursuit of WR's it's more than 40 many times. You have to count how far they run ACROSS the field also(that's where your angle of attack comes in)
May 30, 20242 yr 12 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: Well,I'm shooting for 12 wins. If Hurts steps up see no reason we can't do that. Plus we have the STUD RB we lacked for many years with 2 of the top WR's and now a slot option we didn;t have before. AND if the new coaches can avoid misusing Goedert he should also have a stellar year I’m shooting for 17 regular season wins. Let’s not get that twisted. 10 is my realistic prediction.
May 30, 20242 yr 13 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: And if this defense is WORSE than last years I would be quite AMAZE$D Our D did shut down Miami and KC in the second halves of those big victories last season. If we are discussing win/loss situations.
May 30, 20242 yr Author Just now, GreenbleedinNC said: 35 to 45 is not 10 yards? ok you are right it's 15
May 30, 20242 yr 13 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: I'm just wondering how you can view this team as anywhere worse than last years Lost irreplaceable big time top players from last years team. Cox and Reddick are big losses. Cox was our starting DT and played the most snaps of our DTs. You don’t see that having any negative effects? Reddick was our best pass rusher. No negative effect in that kiss in your mind? Those were probably two of our best defenders last season. Kelce is a huge loss on O. These are very significant losses to me.
May 30, 20242 yr Author Just now, GreenbleedinNC said: ok you are right it's 15 But I am assuming any impact occurs in 10 yards
May 30, 20242 yr Just now, cunninghamtheman said: Lost irreplaceable big time top players from last years team. Cox and Reddick are big losses. Cox was our starting DT and played the most snaps of our DTs. You don’t see that having any negative effects? Reddick was our best pass rusher. No negative effect in that kiss in your mind? Those were probably two of our best defenders last season. Kelce is a huge loss on O. These are very significant losses to me. This is the short version answer mind you
May 30, 20242 yr Author 2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: Lost irreplaceable big time top players from last years team. Cox and Reddick are big losses. Cox was our starting DT and played the most snaps of our DTs. You don’t see that having any negative effects? Reddick was our best pass rusher. No negative effect in that kiss in your mind? Those were probably two of our best defenders last season. Kelce is a huge loss on O. These are very significant losses to me. Reddick yes, Cox probably lost a step our pass rush was MEH. Even so those 2 losses and we didn't get more than 2 better players in here? Guys like Bark and CJG are being discounted?
May 30, 20242 yr 18 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: I'm just wondering how you can view this team as anywhere worse than last years Do you expect being another year older Lane will have an improved season? Or is it more likely he misses more time/is hampered playing injured more than last season?
May 30, 20242 yr Author Just now, cunninghamtheman said: Do you expect being another year older Lane will have an improved season? Or is it more likely he misses more time/is hampered playing injured more than last season? IDK that right side still bothers me,but the secondary is WAY better than last year
May 30, 20242 yr 18 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: You, of course are entitled to your opinion. I'm only trying to discern why you feel that way Same thing I was looking for from you. Pointed out how the media ranking I cited pointed towards Rams and Packers neck and neck with us. Sounds like you believe we are a better team than both. I just asked you the question…but you didn’t answer…instead you just came at his opinion being mine…without answering what your actually even is.
May 30, 20242 yr Author Just now, GreenbleedinNC said: IDK that right side still bothers me,but the secondary is WAY better than last year I'm looking at the overall big picture. We can argue about position to position and hopefully Hurts won't be a bonehead and he won't be tied down with CRAP play calls
May 30, 20242 yr Author Just now, cunninghamtheman said: Same thing I was looking for from you. Pointed out how the media ranking I cited pointed towards Rams and Packers neck and neck with us. Sounds like you believe we are a better team than both. I just asked you the question…but you didn’t answer…instead you just came at his opinion being mine…without answering what your actually even is. If all 3 are neck and neck then that means we can go 1-1 or 2-0? I'm looking for a nice blow out win in Brazil to kick things off because we are going to RATTLE Love if these young guys step up. We need to show the league that 11th ranking is BS
May 30, 20242 yr 19 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: Me too,but you think GB is ahead of the Rams also? I would count those 2 as about the same. GB has a decent secondary but their run D is average at best and we have Bark that can chew them a new one They drafted arguably the top LB in the draft in Cooper. Another LB in the 3rd. Drafted S in the 2nd, 4th and 6th. But also they brought in Jacobs at RB. One could easily argue he’s as good as Saquan. One could also argue our run D is worse than the Packers run D.
May 30, 20242 yr Author Really(not a hater) this is all on your boy Hurts now. No collapses,no BS,no bad decisions. It's time to earn that paycheck and I see zero way this defense is worse than last year when we went 10-1
May 30, 20242 yr Author 2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: They drafted arguably the top LB in the draft in Cooper. Another LB in the 3rd. Drafted S in the 2nd, 4th and 6th. But also they brought in Jacobs at RB. One could easily argue he’s as good as Saquan. One could also argue our run D is worse than the Packers run D. Rookies like we have why are their rookies better than ours?
May 30, 20242 yr 22 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: I would just LOVE to see rook DeJean on Watson. That would be a terrific matchup since DeJean has the size to offset his That’s a pretty large ask for DeJean…especially week one. Would not consider that favorable for us. Hopefully come postseason time…be a better matchup.
May 30, 20242 yr 18 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: In pursuit of WR's it's more than 40 many times. You have to count how far they run ACROSS the field also(that's where your angle of attack comes in) I’m not going on and on and on…about the most fundamental drill based on angle of pursuit. It’s important. Myself and most any coach everywhere believes the same. You aren’t changing my mind on this fact. If you don’t believe angle of pursuit is important to tackle the returner…I believe you’re on your own on that point then. Is what it is.
May 30, 20242 yr Author 1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said: That’s a pretty large ask for DeJean…especially week one. Would not consider that favorable for us. Hopefully come postseason time…be a better matchup. I didn't way we'd see it, I said I would LOVE to see it. He has the size and strength to shut Watson down. So I guess I have higher hopes than you
May 30, 20242 yr Author Just now, cunninghamtheman said: I’m not going on and on and on…about the most fundamental drill based on angle of pursuit. It’s important. Myself and most any coach everywhere believes the same. You aren’t changing my mind on this fact. If you don’t believe angle of pursuit is important to tackle the returner…I believe you’re on your own on that point then. Is what it is. When TF did I say it's not important? What I SAID was on kick offs you aren't getting angle of attack in 10 yards
May 30, 20242 yr 18 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: At least 7 players with foot on the B35 yard line (restraining line) with alignment requirements (outside numbers, numbers to hashes, and inside hashes) All kicking team players other than the kicker will line up with one foot on the receiving team’s B40 yard line
May 30, 20242 yr 20 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: 35 to 45 is not 10 yards? Â 20 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: 35 to 45 is not 10 yards? 40 to 35
Create an account or sign in to comment