July 28Jul 28 17 hours ago, NOTW said:The Police have confirmed that k Drugs and Alcohol were not a factor in the crash, and it was a Mercedes and Tesla - but not sure who was driving what.But the lack of openness stinks of a cover up and thus it makes it easy to presume Shanny is at fault. He was very close to losing sight in his right eye and the concussion is a bad one.
July 28Jul 28 52 minutes ago, UK Eagle said:The Police have confirmed that k Drugs and Alcohol were not a factor in the crash, and it was a Mercedes and Tesla - but not sure who was driving what.But the lack of openness stinks of a cover up and thus it makes it easy to presume Shanny is at fault. He was very close to losing sight in his right eye and the concussion is a bad one.Well, once the lawsuit is filed word will get out. Officially stating they are going to keep it hush-hush is officer BarBrady nothing to see here move on-esque.
July 28Jul 28 On 7/10/2026 at 10:55 AM, LeanMeanGM said:That graphic is "Best set their QB up for success" whatever that means. I would want to know what the qualifiers are but I don't think having the Eagles ranked at above average is that crazy. Assuming it's just skill players it's an older RB in Barkley, Smith with a mixed bag of other WR's and a declining Goedert. There's also a lot on defense that did some lifting to "2nd best roster" that isn't being considered here.I do disagree with a lot of the other teams rankings thoughBut it’s not just skill position. So it should take into account the coaching, offensive line as well as the defense. Eagles should be higher in that "ranking”.
July 28Jul 28 1 hour ago, UK Eagle said:The Police have confirmed that k Drugs and Alcohol were not a factor in the crash, and it was a Mercedes and Tesla - but not sure who was driving what.But the lack of openness stinks of a cover up and thus it makes it easy to presume Shanny is at fault. He was very close to losing sight in his right eye and the concussion is a bad one.I saw an article today that said Shanahan was driving the Tesla and that the Mercedes made an illegal turn in front of him. Shanahan was holding and using a cell phone, which is illegal, but was not found to be at fault.
July 28Jul 28 1 hour ago, ManuManu said:I always wondered why we kept it blank. It looked kinda dumb to be honest.Didn't teams used to have messages on that part of the helmet? Like 'End racism' and crap like that?
July 28Jul 28 15 minutes ago, SwingOnThis said:Didn't teams used to have messages on that part of the helmet? Like 'End racism' and crap like that?Yes
July 28Jul 28 Nate Burleson had 700 yards the next year and 800 after that. I thought this one was gonna be easy… Just absolutely ruined my 98+%
July 28Jul 28 28 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:Barkley will retire soon and hit the tour.Great that’s what we need. More Jason Kelce content.
July 28Jul 28 4 minutes ago, Chest Rockwell said:Great that’s what we need. More Jason Kelce content.hes a background character in that vid. Its focused on John Clark talking with Barkley throughout the round.
July 28Jul 28 10 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:hes a background character in that vid. Its focused on John Clark talking with Barkley throughout the round.Great that's what we need. More John Clark content.
July 28Jul 28 10 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:hes a background character in that vid. Its focused on John Clark talking with Barkley throughout the round.John Clark saying he's an 18 HC. GTFO. His swing is completely busted. Just another guy lying about his HC.
July 28Jul 28 39 minutes ago, Aerolithe_Lion said:Nate Burleson had 700 yards the next year and 800 after that. I thought this one was gonna be easy… Just absolutely ruined my 98+%What even is this?
July 28Jul 28 51 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:Great that's what we need. More John Clark content.Be thankful. It could be more ESP content.
July 28Jul 28 2 hours ago, mikemack8 said:I saw an article today that said Shanahan was driving the Tesla and that the Mercedes made an illegal turn in front of him. Shanahan was holding and using a cell phone, which is illegal, but was not found to be at fault.One of those
July 28Jul 28 3 hours ago, ManuManu said:With players reporting to camp today, the things I’m most looking forward to…- How does Hurts adapt to playing under center and what I assume will be a timing, progression-based offense? I don’t think it will be an easy transition.- What exactly is Mannion’s system compared to the Shanahan’s and LaFleurs of the world?- In terms of players, I’m most looking forward to Lemon. Can he be a legit outside receiver? Does he need to be protected in the slot or in condensed sets? He’ll get tested immediately here with Q, Riq and Coop. Does Lemon start right away or does Wicks keep him at WR3 when the season opens?- How busy will Devonta be? The team leaked that they see Smith in a JSN-like role. Let’s see if there’s a drum beat in camp.— No injuries. As always, this is tue most important thing about camp. How does the beat up OL look? Do Jurgens and Dickerson have their athleticism back?I'm wondering if he struggles will they revert backThat would be awesome if he can be a legit outside receiver but I want to temper my hopes lolA lot of fans seems to think Smith will have success as WR1 and I hope they're right. I think most of that is the hate towards AJ thoughI've kind of given up on Cam and Landon. I just don't think they'll last and think it was a bad choice to give them extensions
July 28Jul 28 1 hour ago, devpool said:What even is this?It’s a daily NFL trivia game, it has ~8 games with questions every day like "name the top 15 receivers based on yards gained in the 2000’s” or "what player is/was #8, went to BYU, and appeared in at least 3 All-Pro teams?”The question I got caught up on was "give the highest receiving yards from a single season from 2000-2009 by a player in the NFC West who’s never made a pro bowl.”My initial thought was golden Tate, but we traded for him in 2018 so he very unlikely played in the 2000’s… or if he did it was a rookie year in 2008 or 2009 with minimal receiving yards. So if I want a good score I need someone with a decent WR2 season who never was great. Rob Moore maybe? Brandon Lloyd had a fluke year in Denver where he had like 1300 yards so he may have made a pro bowl. Nate Burleson is a good choice, just need to get the year right… and I didn’t.It’s call NFL gridiron, in your app store. Best games are this, NFL wordle, and the first one (forgot what that’s called)
July 28Jul 28 27 minutes ago, RememberTheKoy said:Would have expected him higher. Not getting picks really hurts the recognition
July 28Jul 28 6 minutes ago, Aerolithe_Lion said:It’s a daily NFL trivia game, it has ~8 questions every day like "name the top 15 receivers based on yards gained in the 2000’s” or "what player is/was #8, went to BYU, and appeared in at least 3 All-Pro teams?”The question I got caught up on was "give the highest receiving yards from a single season from 2000-2009 by a player in the NFC West who’s never made a pro bowl.”My initial thought was golden Tate, but we traded for him in 2018 so he very unlikely played in the 2000’s… or if he did it was a rookie year in 2008 or 2009 with minimal receiving yards. So if I want a good score I need someone with a decent WR2 season who never was great. Rob Moore maybe? Brandon Lloyd had a fluke year in Denver where he had like 1300 yards so he may have made a pro bowl. Nate Burleson is a good choice, just need to get the year right… and I didn’t.It’s call NFL gridiron, in your app store. Best games are this, NFL wordle, and the first one (forgot what that’s called)Bobby Engram
July 28Jul 28 53 minutes ago, UK Eagle said:Be thankful. It could be more ESP content.There’s something very off putting for me when it comes to John Clark. I’m not entirely convinced he’s even a real person. I wouldn’t be surprised if he was a reptilian or some AI generated being.
July 28Jul 28 5 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:Bobby EngramThat’s not bad. He’s another case of "get the year right”, because his 1100 yard season was sandwiched between a 400 and a 200
Create an account or sign in to comment