20 minutes ago, 4thandLong said:

Just came over from the old board.  I was mainly a lurker and posted occasionally.  Happy to be here and will try an post more.  Let's get pumped for our WR pick on Thursday!!!  🤘  I am hoping a top WR falls.  I think the chances are remote, but we can hope!

Welcome

Just now, In2football said:

Thought it was hilarous 

Yup, me too

my round 1 board looks like this right now:

WR: Ruggs/Lamb/Jeudy/Jefferson/Reagor/Mims

TE: n/a

OL: n/a

DT: Kinlaw

DE: Chiasson

LB: Murray/Queen

CB: Henderson

S: Delpit/McKinney

Are we supposed to complain about the newly drafted wrs here or on the old board?  Asking for a friend.

2 hours ago, JSEagle said:

Assuming the top guys are gone...

I'll take Higgins or Jefferson and be happy with it. Don't want Reagor at 21 and Shenault is an injury waiting to happen. Pass.

Im still here. 

1 minute ago, eagle45 said:

Are we supposed to complain about the newly drafted wrs here or on the old board?  Asking for a friend.

yes

Just now, eagle45 said:

Are we supposed to complain about the newly drafted wrs here or on the old board?  Asking for a friend.

Why not both. But if bpacs link comes true i think you will be dancing

1 minute ago, eagle45 said:

Are we supposed to complain about the newly drafted wrs here or on the old board?  Asking for a friend.

Haha, planning ahead are we?  😆

1 minute ago, In2football said:

Why not both. But if bpacs link comes true i think you will be dancing

I think 3 WRs get drafted before our pick. I’m not supremely confident in that, but it’s looking that way.

If someone goes for Jefferson over Ruggs, then maybe he will be there.

6 minutes ago, eagle45 said:

Are we supposed to complain about the newly drafted wrs here or on the old board?  Asking for a friend.

 

 

I'll be here, but why limit yourself? 

4 minutes ago, In2football said:

Why not both. But if bpacs link comes true i think you will be dancing

I have this bad feeling about Ruggs...

1 minute ago, Iggles_Phan said:

I have this bad feeling about Ruggs...

Actually my dream scenario would be ruggs and jefferson.

Its just not possible

@HazletonEagle can you get like 10 posts bashing Barnett so this can feel like home?

Hello friends!  Good to see everyone over here....serious props to @VaBeach_Eagle for putting this together so quickly.  It's like we never moved.

2 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

I can't believe how similar this board is to the old one.  Maybe I don't understand how those things work.  But it's great!  

Its running on invision. Thats the same as the old board. VA matchex by color schemes etc. 

So really the only thing that changed was the address

1 minute ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

So do I.  It's called John Rossitis.  It's an affliction.  

Is it crazy to say Reagor is the safer pick between the two?

When does the Ceast and Desist letter come from the Eagles for this board looking the same?  I mean wow, it feels the exact same and is great.  Kudos!

That rumor floating around that the Chiefs might be interested in Ruggs is silly.  They could draft Hamler much lower and he would have nearly the same impact in that offense as Ruggs.  That being said, Andy did draft Kevin Kolb and the firefighter.  

4 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

If we take anyone outside of the top 3 at 21, I think it's a mistake.  We need to be shopping out pick right away.  So if they are all gone at 20.  Then we are ready to move down.  I am thinking late 1st is a great spot to get JJ or Higgins and we pick up an additional 3rd.  Then we can get our speedster (Hamler) in the 2nd or 3rd.  

A trade down would not be a bad idea at all.  San Fran is also shopping their 31st pick would could be enticing.  

Where am I? And what Fing day is it?

Surely if San Fran are keen enough to move up 10 spots for a particular WR, then that WR should be very much on our radar at 21...Dropping down 10 spots so an NFC rival can take a WR that is a need for us just doesn't make sense...

1 minute ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

San Fran moving up for a WR would make sense.  KC would not.  

I agree.  I am not saying that is what they should do, I was just commenting on the stupid rumor.  However, when Andy gets obsessed with something, he goes through with it.  Right now he is addicted to speed (which isn't a bad thing in today's NFL).  They let Demarcus Robison go but he was also a speed guy.  I could see them drafting Hamler and maybe even reaching for him.  It would be such an Andy Reid thing to do.

2 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

San Fran moving up for a WR would make sense.  KC would not.  

based on the thinking, the Eagles are out if the top 3 are gone(maybe 4). So going from 31 to 21 is pretty rich for a team to take a WR at 21 when they can still get a good one at 31. I think the Eagles are kind of stuck with their pick. It is kind of a no man's land in the 1st round.

19 minutes ago, In2football said:

Actually my dream scenario would be ruggs and jefferson.

Its just not possible

I would like any combo of

Jefferson and Reagor

Reagor and Mims

Reagor and Higgins

Mims and Hamler

6 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

San Fran moving up for a WR would make sense.  KC would not.  

San Fran has both 13th and 31st.  They would not need to move up if they wanted one of the top guys.  Or maybe just a few spots at most.

19 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

So do I.  It's called John Rossitis.  It's an affliction.  

I think injuries and playing for the Bengals have enough culpability in the failure of John Ross that he doesn't need to serve as a precedent for failure for all the 5'11" WRs with blazing speed on the field and in shorts.