17 minutes ago, TorontoEagle said:

I wonder if Olsen will be able to maintain a neutral position, or if he'll have a strong bias to his old team. 

Do not like.  Olsen is a terrible announcer.  Last game I watched he claimed that the "loss of down" with intentional grounding was a "new rule".  Uh, no it's not Greg. 

1 minute ago, greend said:

That said don't give me no garbage about how the players lost respect over it. They may have lost it for other reasons but that would be very hypocritical on a lot of their part

I think the losing respect comes from not flying home with the team, canceling team meetings because he's afraid to address the team, etc. Not the act itself. I doubt any player actually cares some lady was rubbing on him. 

9 minutes ago, Utebird said:

Makes one wonder what the heck Mike's Sanders was doing on those runs, dudes not getting the ball and when he did against the chiefs he did a whole lotta nothin

He bounces it outside, jukes when he doesn't need to and runs out of bounds instead of cutting back inside for additional yards

A good listen.

 

The clift notes version of this, Fletcher Cox will more than likely be a post June 1 designation release next year.

 

5 minutes ago, Alphagrand said:

His carries were not memorable, but my perception was he was trying to bounce outside too much instead of going north-south

Yeah he had one carry can't remember when but remember it he had a hole and if he hits it maybe he could grind out 4, 5 yards instead he bounced it, where he had another hole decided to bounce it out again and took a loss or a gain of one, I was screaming, " Hit the freaking hole"

Gainwell has shown much better vision this year Sanders not so much, not sure what his problem is.?

Gannon:

"We're all pissed off about the last two games."

5 minutes ago, Mike030270 said:

His wife didn't seem to mind so I don't think anyone should care 🤷‍♂️

I noticed posts show up if you're typing in the text editor and they've posted because it will just show all recent posts added

The blog has had off topic discussions that have lasted pages. It'd be hypocritical to ban him

Mike he's not off topic he's off his nut. Can't have discussions with him because his posts make no sense.

1 minute ago, Connecticut Eagle said:

Gannon:

"We're all pissed off about the last two games."

 

4 minutes ago, Connecticut Eagle said:

Is it really a discussion?

Can i get the origin of the word? Can you use it in a sentence 

5 minutes ago, TorontoEagle said:

I have no issue with off topic discussions. He has no topic. His posts are completely nonsensical. They literally add nothing at all to any discussion, on or off topic. What's the point? 

I am not going to sit here and defend him but I think he's topically address things via metaphor and sometimes it misses it's mark.  I don't think he's nonsensical or off topic necessarily.  He's just using a different means of communication.  I am not sure that he adds to the conversation from a substantive stand point but I don't know if that's different than many of us.  

9 minutes ago, EricAllenPick6 said:

Do not like.  Olsen is a terrible announcer.  Last game I watched he claimed that the "loss of down" with intentional grounding was a "new rule".  Uh, no it's not Greg. 

Olsen was much better than Griese.  Griese is the worst.  

2 minutes ago, NCiggles said:

I am not going to sit here and defend him but I think he's topically address things via metaphor and sometimes it misses it's mark.  I don't think he's nonsensical or off topic necessarily.  He's just using a different means of communication.  I am not sure that he adds to the conversation from a substantive stand point but I don't know if that's different than many of us.  

Considering a message board relies on clear communication, we shouldn't have to decipher his posts to engage with him. I don't even understand what he gets out of it, if nobody engages with him anyway? Again, what's the point of it all? 

20 minutes ago, Connecticut Eagle said:

 

 

"always with the negative vibes moriarity"

4 minutes ago, NCiggles said:

I am not going to sit here and defend him but I think he's topically address things via metaphor and sometimes it misses it's mark.  I don't think he's nonsensical or off topic necessarily.  He's just using a different means of communication.  I am not sure that he adds to the conversation from a substantive stand point but I don't know if that's different than many of us.  

I tend to view his posts like this 

Im just going to start reporting the incoherent offtopic posts, this is insufferable

Ive literally never, ever put anyone on ignore

@hputenis

standing in line at chipotle. Don’t know if I’ll be in line longer or on the toilet longer 

5 minutes ago, NCiggles said:

I am not going to sit here and defend him but I think he's topically address things via metaphor and sometimes it misses it's mark.  I don't think he's nonsensical or off topic necessarily.  He's just using a different means of communication.  I am not sure that he adds to the conversation from a substantive stand point but I don't know if that's different than many of us.  

He is a product of bad breeding and the overuse of pharmacueticals like adderral and ritalin, with deplorable low schoolastic standards these days

🤣🤣

13 minutes ago, Connecticut Eagle said:

Gannon:

"We're all pissed off about the last two games."

If you have the time, it's a good watch.  Very accountable. 

Used the phrase "Head ball coach" when referring to Sirianni. 

 

 

2 minutes ago, Mike31mt said:

Im just going to start reporting the incoherent offtopic posts, this is insufferable

Ive literally never, ever put anyone on ignore

Ive got 28 on ignore. And he is one of them, and yet for some unknown glitch I keep seeing his posts too. 

 

This was a pretty bad PC

 

2 minutes ago, EaglePhan1986 said:

@hputenis

standing in line at chipotle. Don’t know if I’ll be in line longer or on the toilet longer 

I haven't been to one of those since before the e. coli outbreak years ago

5 minutes ago, TorontoEagle said:

Considering a message board relies on clear communication, we shouldn't have to decipher his posts to engage with him. I don't even understand what he gets out of it, if nobody engages with him anyway? Again, what's the point of it all? 

I did give him a like once for posting a Tool music video....how can you not?  But most other times I have no clue what he's talking about.  

Just skip his posts if you don't want to read them.

3 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

 

 

So... they go with 4 down and a void in the middle of the field.  

2 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

 

 

We don't have LBs though