September 17Sep 17 1 hour ago, Appalachian_Eagle said:I know! In the past I barely watched any of the prior coaches PCs. But I find myself always tuning in to Vic’s and watching them until the very end. I could listen to him all day. I love how blunt he is. He’s actually pretty hilarious without trying to be lolLove it when he wants to not answer a question, he grins and his response is usually golden.
September 17Sep 17 I didn't get to watch the game as I was out in the boondocks hunting elk but listened to the broadcast on Sirius. Sounds like he wss open on a couple of plays. Glad to see he is at least contributing and doing the dirty work
September 17Sep 17 2 minutes ago, Cliftoma said:I didn't get to watch the game as I was out in the boondocks hunting elk but listened to the broadcast on Sirius. Sounds like he wss open on a couple of plays. Glad to see he is at least contributing and doing the dirty workAlways good to see a rookie receiver putting in that kind of work.
September 17Sep 17 1 hour ago, Mike030270 said:Very much so. I don't know if it's the age range or the anti-laid back approach like LMGM said but the players bought in and he's produced all pros. His PCs are also very different from Nick so it also adds to it. I can't stand the secretiveness from Nick. Probably why I don't watch a lot of his PCs. Vic doesn't seem to care and will answer questions. He's also very honest and will say when someone did poorly. It's great I often think about how pissed Nick and Howie are after Vic’s press conferences when he just says it how it is. After it’s over I picture them saying "Come on Vic, really?!” and him just going “….what?”
September 17Sep 17 21 minutes ago, Joe Ball said:Always good to see a rookie receiver putting in that kind of work.It’s nice and all but Hurts was tackled like 3 yards after this. I wouldn’t say it’s "springing free” but Petersen is a moron so I guess it makes sense
September 17Sep 17 7 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:It’s nice and all but Hurts was tackled like 3 yards after this. I wouldn’t say it’s "springing free” but Petersen is a moron so I guess it makes senseLike I said, I didnt get to watch it so I dont really the context. All good.though.
September 17Sep 17 2 minutes ago, Cliftoma said:Like I said, I didnt get to watch it so I dont really the context. All good.though.All good. It was a nice block from the rook. But that dude said it was the most impactful play from any offensive rookie in the NFL which is just stupid. He also thinks Dickerson is a RG
September 17Sep 17 35 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:I think we’ve officially reached the saturation point with some of these stats that are coming out. No analyst or outsider can sit there, watch the tape, and know who was the first read or where the ball is designed to go without knowing the play call or the overall offensive philosophy for a specific team. We are in the paralysis by analysis era.
September 17Sep 17 Frankly, I would have activated Moore over Hollywood. He shouldn’t be surprised given he did not earn playing time in camp.
September 17Sep 17 6 hours ago, DaBirds said:The Giants hype is crazy funny.To be fair, they earned it and thoroughly dominated Dallas in that game more than the score suggested. A problem that they might have is relying on a core three of Dart, Skattebo, and Nabers to stay healthy when they have not so far. Malachai Fields could end up being a good player for them as well.But I don’t know if Dallas is worse than people thought or if the Giants are a legitimate team. Everything is a week 1 overreaction at this point.
September 17Sep 17 1 hour ago, LeanMeanGM said:It’s nice and all but Hurts was tackled like 3 yards after this. I wouldn’t say it’s "springing free” but Petersen is a moron so I guess it makes senseEh, I don’t know the writer and didn’t watch the entire game, don’t remember this play. Just commenting on a highly drafted young receiver doing the little things vs acting like most entitled receivers. Yeh he’ll need to produce more but the approach seems solid early.
September 17Sep 17 58 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:All good. It was a nice block from the rook. But that dude said it was the most impactful play from any offensive rookie in the NFL which is just stupid. He also thinks Dickerson is a RGMainly, I just want people to cut the rook some slack. Yeah, he may not be big, he may not be a burner, but I think the kid is going to be a good player. I know he battles for the ball. I know he can cut and get open. Good to see him making blocks. Just have to give a chance for them to figure to use his skillset. By the end of the season, if he stays healthy, I think he can be an impact player for this team.
September 17Sep 17 4 minutes ago, BDawk_ASamuel said:To be fair, they earned it and thoroughly dominated Dallas in that game more than the score suggested. A problem that they might have is relying on a core three of Dart, Skattebo, and Nabers to stay healthy when they have not so far. Malachai Fields could end up being a good player for them as well.But I don’t know if Dallas is worse than people thought or if the Giants are a legitimate team. Everything is a week 1 overreaction at this point.I think DAL is definitely worse than expected, and if Harbaugh can keep them in their game-plan week after week, and they can stay relatively healthy they’re going to be better than expected. They will not be able to do to PHI what they did to DAL, PHI defense won’t stand for that kind of BS. That’s going to be fun to watch.
September 17Sep 17 2 hours ago, BigEFly said:I am in favor of the trainers, doctors, players and the team in making that decision.I am not. Very poor recent track record.
September 17Sep 17 45 minutes ago, BDawk_ASamuel said:To be fair, they earned it and thoroughly dominated Dallas in that game more than the score suggested. A problem that they might have is relying on a core three of Dart, Skattebo, and Nabers to stay healthy when they have not so far. Malachai Fields could end up being a good player for them as well.But I don’t know if Dallas is worse than people thought or if the Giants are a legitimate team. Everything is a week 1 overreaction at this point.Thoroughly dominated is a stretch. They are mid.
September 17Sep 17 27 minutes ago, DaBirds said:Thoroughly dominated is a stretch.They are mid.Dallas had two possessions in the second half. They punked them. And then Dak did his typical stat padding when it didn’t matter to mitigate the loss.
September 17Sep 17 4 minutes ago, BDawk_ASamuel said:Dallas had two possessions in the second half. They punked them. And then Dak did his typical stat padding when it didn’t matter to mitigate the loss.Awesome. Definitely proved the last decade was a fluke and they are legit. /s
September 17Sep 17 5 minutes ago, DaBirds said:Awesome.Definitely proved the last decade was a fluke and they are legit. /sI don’t know if they’re legit or not, but the past decade isn’t relevant since Daniel Jones, Brian Daboll, or Joe Judge aren’t there anymore.
September 17Sep 17 2 hours ago, BDawk_ASamuel said:I think we’ve officially reached the saturation point with some of these stats that are coming out. No analyst or outsider can sit there, watch the tape, and know who was the first read or where the ball is designed to go without knowing the play call or the overall offensive philosophy for a specific team. We are in the paralysis by analysis era.Except fans on a message board who know for sure.
September 17Sep 17 32 minutes ago, BDawk_ASamuel said:I don’t know if they’re legit or not, but the past decade isn’t relevant since Daniel Jones, Brian Daboll, or Joe Judge aren’t there anymore.We’ll see.
Create an account or sign in to comment